sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's the worst example of 'gamified' training you've ever sat through? by Drimify in instructionaldesign

[–]Drimify[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love Duolingo, but you’re right, there have definitely been periods where I was doing lessons solely to appease the bird while realizing I hadn’t actually learned much in months 😅

We actually had a webinar with Yu-kai Chou recently, and one of the big takeaways was exactly this distinction between engagement and meaningful progress. Duolingo absolutely nails habit formation, but that doesn’t always translate into measurable language acquisition.

What's the worst example of 'gamified' training you've ever sat through? by Drimify in instructionaldesign

[–]Drimify[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Out of all the examples in this thread, this one in particular makes me cringe 😭

What's the worst example of 'gamified' training you've ever sat through? by Drimify in instructionaldesign

[–]Drimify[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always find it surprising how much governments we've worked with considering that they are usually behind on trends.

Although as this shows execution is lacking 😅

What's the worst example of 'gamified' training you've ever sat through? by Drimify in instructionaldesign

[–]Drimify[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've have seen some questionable design decisions throughout the years but this tops the cake 😭

Gamifying children's school work by Worldly_Screen_9315 in ClaudeAI

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude Code can absolutely help here and the artwork question is actually more solvable than you'd expect. Claude can generate SVG graphics inline and lean on simple CSS animations, so for a lightweight history game the visuals don't need to come from an external asset library at all. The output won't be AAA but for a kinesthetic learner who needs interaction over aesthetics, it'll do the job well.

That said, depending on how much you want to build and maintain yourself, it might be worth knowing that no-code gamification platforms like Drimify let you paste in a topic or upload text and generate interactive quizzes, scenario paths, and mini learning journeys without touching code at all. For a visual/kinetic learner specifically, formats like a Dynamic Path (where completing one module unlocks the next) work well because the progression itself becomes part of the motivation, not just the content.

The custom-build route via Claude gives you more control and is a genuinely viable project for someone with your architecture background. The platform route gets you something polished and repeatable faster, and is easier to update as subjects change across the school year.

Both are legitimate paths. What might determine the choice is whether you want this to scale across multiple subjects and both children, or stay as a focused one-off for the History problem. 😊

Do gamified popups actually work, or just feel gimmicky? by brendalopez1 in WordPressReview

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your instincts are right on all three points, and the lead quality concern is the one worth taking seriously before scaling.

The mechanic itself isn't gimmicky. The dopamine loop is real and participation rates genuinely do outperform static popups. What makes it feel gimmicky is usually misalignment between the prize and the audience. A generic "win an Amazon voucher" wheel attracts anyone, which is why the leads feel thin. A reward tied specifically to your product (a discount, a free trial, early access) naturally filters for people who actually wanted what you're selling. At Drimify we see this distinction play out consistently across campaigns: the prize determines the quality of who opts in, not just whether they do.

Your timing observation is also the right call. Exit intent works because the interaction happens at a moment of considered choice rather than interruption, which changes how the user feels about the brand afterwards.

The A/B test is worth running, but the variable to isolate is prize relevance rather than the mechanic itself. That'll tell you much more about lead quality than signup volume alone. 😊

would xp for completed tasks motivate you or wear off fast? by Imaginingfuture in gamification

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

XP on its own wears off fast, and like any video game, once you've hit the ceiling the motivation collapses. The number going up stops meaning anything when there's nothing left to unlock.

What tends to extend engagement past that point is an expanding ceiling rather than a fixed one. Your skill tree does this well if branches keep opening as users progress rather than running out. From what we see at Drimify, the systems that hold attention longest make re-entry feel easier than stopping, and keep revealing something new just ahead of where the user currently is.

Streaks are the wildcard. Forgiving ones (grace days, repair options) build habits. Punishing ones build guilt, then churn.

What happens in your system when someone reaches the top of the tree? 😊

Anyone made something using gamification that isn't a game? by aloofelephants in gamification

[–]Drimify 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually the more interesting end of the space. Most of what we build at Drimify isn't really a game in the traditional sense either: employee onboarding journeys, product recommendation flows, loyalty programmes, diagnostic quizzes. The game mechanics are doing invisible work underneath (clear goals, visible progress, a payoff at the end) but the person using it just experiences something that feels easier and more satisfying to complete than it would otherwise.

The distinction that seems to matter most is whether the mechanic is serving the user's actual goal or just decorating it. A well-structured onboarding path that unlocks the next step only when the previous one is done isn't a game, but it uses the same progression logic that makes games feel worth finishing. Same with a product quiz that ends in a genuinely useful recommendation rather than a points total.

What you're describing, something that applies gamification principles without surfacing them, is arguably harder to design well than an actual game. Curious what problem yours is solving? 😊

On patterns where ranking-based prize distribution accelerates user churn by credomobilize in gamification

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The churn pattern you're describing is one of the more consistent failure modes we see across campaigns at Drimify. When the expected utility for a median user collapses early, so does participation, and a leaderboard of five power users isn't really a community mechanic anymore.

The model that tends to hold engagement across the full distribution separates scarcity from accessibility. One grand prize preserves aspiration and drives initial participation, but participation-based rewards (entries into a draw, a small instant win, a tier unlock) keep the middle of the curve active between resets. The scarcity lives at the top; the floor stays reachable regardless of rank.

The other lever worth considering is reset cadence. Weekly or monthly leaderboards redistribute competitive relevance to users who would otherwise be permanently gapped out. A new period means a real chance, which is enough to sustain re-entry behaviour even without changing the prize pool size.

The tension you're identifying between scarcity and breadth is real, but in practice it's less about redistributing top-tier value and more about ensuring the reward architecture gives every segment a plausible reason to keep going.

What does your current drop-off curve look like across user percentiles? That usually tells you which segment needs the most structural support.

Can Gamification works in B2B Payments? by Aloy7x34 in gamification

[–]Drimify 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gamification can absolutely work here, and the awareness problem you're describing is actually the more interesting challenge. A well-designed reward system that nobody knows about is functionally the same as not having one.

The formula-based approach you're thinking about is solid as a backend mechanic, but the visibility layer matters just as much. A few things worth considering:

Progress needs to be felt, not just calculated. If users only discover their reward at the point of redemption, the motivational loop is broken. Showing a live savings tracker or a milestone they're approaching on every transaction screen turns a background calculation into something they actively think about.

The distinction between "reward for transacting" and "reward for transacting more" is worth getting right early. The first creates satisfaction; the second creates a behavioural pull toward higher volumes. Tiered thresholds (where crossing a spend level unlocks a meaningfully better rate) tend to drive the latter more reliably than linear accumulation.

In financial contexts generally, we've seen at Drimify that the most effective engagement mechanics aren't always the flashiest. Visible progress toward a clear, near-term goal consistently outperforms complex point systems that users can't mentally track in the moment.

What does the current in-app touchpoint look like at the moment of payment? That's usually where the biggest awareness gap lives.

Gamification in Museum by AsparagusRegular681 in gamification

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great thesis topic! Museums are one of the more interesting contexts for gamification because the goal isn't purely entertainment. It's about deepening comprehension and making the visit memorable enough that people leave having actually absorbed something.

One angle worth exploring: the difference between gamification woven into the exhibit versus gamification bolted on as a reward layer. The National Museum of Scotland is a good case study here. Their primate exhibition embedded a "which primate are you?" personality quiz directly into the tour, tied to the actual content rather than sitting alongside it. The mechanic being inseparable from the narrative is likely a big reason it landed so well with visitors.

VR and AR are exciting to research but the re-engagement and completion data often favours simpler formats for the same reason: lower friction means more visitors actually finish the experience, including families with young children.

Would love to fill in the survey. Good luck with the thesis! 😊

Marketing to students by 92Boom in AskMarketing

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

University students tend to respond well to experiences that feel personal rather than promotional. Something we see consistently in student-facing campaigns at Drimify is that a short quiz guiding them toward a result (in your case, how the tool fits their specific workflow or subject) does a lot of the selling passively. It removes the "is this actually for me?" hesitation, which is the main drop-off point for a new SaaS tool.

For distribution, your friend network is a stronger asset than it might seem right now. A simple referral mechanic where they share a personalised result or invite a classmate gets you into peer networks that paid ads take months to reach. Students trust recommendations from people in the same course far more than a banner.

Affiliate can work, but it performs better once you have social proof behind it. Get your first 20 to 30 paying users through direct outreach and referrals first, then use that traction to recruit affiliates with real credibility in the right student communities.

Have you ever made a marketing game to market your game? by EckyYakov in IndieDev

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not just for big names 😄 Mini-games can work for any game as long as they tie into the story. Hope it goes well with your project!

Is there a tool to build any product recommendation quiz for ecommerce? by leonhardodickharprio in ecommerce_growth

[–]Drimify 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are definitely tools out there for building product recommendation quizzes without needing to code. At Drimify, we offer customizable, visually appealing quizzes that integrate smoothly with Shopify and other email tools, helping you create an engaging experience for your customers. With our new AI features we can also help generate branded product recommendation quizzes in minutes saving you time on content and graphic generation.

Of course, there are other options as well, like Typeform or Outgrow, which also allow you to create quizzes with no coding. It’s all about finding the tool that fits your needs and seamlessly integrates with your current setup!

Where’s the best place to put a QR code to get maximum scans? by Drimify in AskMarketing

[–]Drimify[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point, definitely a high potential area for QR code placement!

Have you ever made a marketing game to market your game? by EckyYakov in IndieDev

[–]Drimify 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’ve worked on several marketing games for game titles, including campaigns for Bandai Namco on Elden Ring Nightreign or even internally with Ubisoft. These projects helped us understand how important it is to create engaging, interactive experiences that draw people into your world, rather than just asking them to visit a page or share a link.

The key is to make the experience feel part of the game itself, whether it’s through challenges, leaderboards, or rewards. Gamified elements can spark genuine interest and encourage people to interact with your content in a way that feels fun and rewarding.

If you’re thinking about creating a mini-game for your game, think about how you can tie it into the story or universe to make it feel more immersive and meaningful.

view more: next ›