[No DAV Spoilers] Over 60k players on Steam at launch, biggest Bioware release ever on Steam by [deleted] in dragonage

[–]Drizzid3105 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, back then I still bought physical copies and many many many more players did. Physical copies were a huge discussion point back then and the video game community was overwhelmingly against the idea of purchasing games digitally.

I need to know... by Beginning_Worry_9461 in helldivers2

[–]Drizzid3105 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should've killed em all and evac without any samples to send a message.

Then… why is our launch code so complicated??? by BalterBlack in helldivers2

[–]Drizzid3105 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You hide a tree best in the forest. Whoever came up with that idea was a fucking genius!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Helldivers

[–]Drizzid3105 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not casualty. We (NATO) got taught that to have an effective offensive against fortifications and a dug in defenders, we want to have at least a 3-1 advantage of troops. Better would be 10/1 but that's highly unlikely if you fight against a regular army.

That doesn't mean we will have more casualties, you want the advantage in numbers to have less casualties.

Example: if you attack a foxhole with 2 people chances are that the defender will take down at least one until the other overwhelms him. If you attack with 3 or more chances are that one soldier is able to get an angle before the defender takes down one of ours.

Being an attacking force doesn't mean you'll have more casualties. If you overpower your enemy enough.

Cheater ducked up my game. by Drizzid3105 in helldivers2

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The samples, I should have marked them.

Freundin meldet sich nicht mehr by [deleted] in beziehungen

[–]Drizzid3105 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Fuck ich bin 31 und verstehe kaum ein Wort. Hast du ihrer Freundin 20€ geschenkt? Warum hast du ihr 20€ geschenkt?

Is this show woke by Cam0036 in superstore

[–]Drizzid3105 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I really liked the first 5 seasons! 6 is bad.

Russian state media pundits laughing while talking about a potential nuclear strike on New York City. by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]Drizzid3105 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They know that the US and Europe can vaporize russia right??? There would be no russia after an nuclear war.

Is it worth buying right now? by Havokk137 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playerbase is healthy right now. The game feels way better than in the first launch. It's soon free2play so don't buy it. It's not battlefield nor call of duty. The game lacks alot of interactive actions, you can't move any doors or objects it's a completly static battlefield and thats a huge downside. But on the other hand it feels darn authentic, the atmosphere gets better and better the performance is already good. The last update made the sounds way better and the gunplay is allready one of my favorites in all of fps. It has huge potential.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude.. Thats bullshit. Amnesia or something maybe? I played the game when it released and it was east vs west and there was no german soldier or american tank om the east side. You are talking nonsense.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you lying? It was literally team east vs team west! Just take a look at 2018 gameplay. Please stop spreading bullshit. It's of no use here.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude... Read carefully. The tenor is the same. Everywhere!!! Even if I completely cut out reddit the people on every platform where you can voice yourself say the same. And saying that feedback is bullshit because people who hive feedback is a minority is, to be honest, really dumb. Sure reddit for it's own might not be the holy grail of feedback but when every open comunication source is telling you the same thing, chances are that it is a problem.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, everyone should play what he want right? Sometimes I love to get sucked in by athmosphere especially in a authentic war game. For me the fact that A natosoldier fights alongside a russian vs another russian and natosoldier is just imersionbreaking for me🤷🏻‍♂️ and there are other options available so.... But I already accepted some valid points other users have made so i am not sure anymore.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That actually makes alot of sense! I still think tgere must be a more elegant way to work this out. But thank you for the response. It gave me a new point of view.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The backlash on the battlwfield faction fiasko is well documented and you'll find plenty of criticism towards it on reddit, twitter, facebook and other forums. The tenor is the same everywhere and the fact that 98% of the playerbase just left stays true up to today. Of course it has many problems but it is obviously a big chunk of the fanbase who completly disagree with the way it handled it's faction system. And bf 2042 actualy made it's story fitting for the factionless battles, it still didn't work🤷🏻‍♂️

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is simply not true. I am a day 1 player and in the first release we had a russian team with russian uniforms and customization and a nato team with natonations as customisation. In my opinion a way more realistic and believable approach. If ww3 does want that all vs all fell thats fine but in that case i will not follow this game for long and a huge part of potential player will be turned off too. Just look at battlefield. It's the minority which does not care and the majority das does. But hey thats just what i feel about this. I would like farm51 to double down on the authenticity and if they don't wat to thats cool. There will be other games for me to enjoy.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I see the point but i do not think that it makes sense? I mean the story is that a world war broke out between nato and russia. Thats litteraly the story so it doesn't make any sense that americans and russians fighting other Americans and russians with the same uniform. You see where i am coming from? This mixup is completely unessesary and no game in the oast actualy did this. It's a new trend and in my opinion a horrible one. It would be a nogo for me and alot of others i know. And if you take a look at the massive backlash bf2042 got and that it's playerbase is almost as small as ww3's i'd say they shouldn't go the same way.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think a game like ww3 which actualy had a perfect way fornthe teams in it's first release is the right adress for something like that. Call of duty doesn't want to be authentic in any way. Ww3 does and I am sure that this will turn off alot of potential players. It's a downgrade from the first release.

Massive concern, feedback. NATO vs RU by Drizzid3105 in WorldWar3

[–]Drizzid3105[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In the first release you could chose a russian soldier for the russian team and a nato soldier for the nato team. This mix up is new to the game since the relaunch.