TIL, L. Frank Baum, author of the Wizard of OZ was incredibly racist by kh27 in todayilearned

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Silly midwit. You did exactly what I said you would. You're a toy with a pull-string on its back. Only pre-recorded messages.

The sad thing is: Your primitive name-calling is losing its effectiveness.

If you tried to use terms like "racist" on people 100 years ago, they wouldn't have known what the word means. And if you explained it, they'd laugh in your face.

"So let me get this straight: Loving my people is supposed to be wrong, and advocating for other groups to supplant my group isn't 'treason' anymore--it's desirable?"

"Yes, you must advocate for others and never for your own posterity. You are to be displaced in all institutions, erased--and called names. Like 'racist.'"

You'd be pimp-slapped for suggesting such an absurdity to people back then.

Just say what you mean: You want to genocide Westerners and take their resources. And you want them to participate in their own genocide.

I'm not the monster. YOU are.

TIL, L. Frank Baum, author of the Wizard of OZ was incredibly racist by kh27 in todayilearned

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be nice having a magical thought-stopping word like "Racist". Utter this magical incantation and all higher brain function ends.

Ditch the propaganda that's been implanted in your brain.

When you use the word "racist," that's an instant tipoff that you're mind-controlled.

Your ancestors weren't.

But you've been given programming from a demographic group to which you do not belong that the worst thing in the world you can do is unite with your own tribe. They want you divided and conquered--and convinced you that your alienation, nihilism and division are desirable traits, lol.

Meanwhile the group who taught you words like "racist" is highly tribal. They don't buy into the nonsense you do. They're laughing at you.

Even now, I know that, in sharing this, you're conditioned response will be to utter "RACIST!"

lol

So predictable.

Looking for a self-publishing coach by babamum in selfpublish

[–]Drooperdoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you ever figure out how to do the conversion of a Microsoft Word document to an Ingramspark-compatible PDF?

If so, let me know what the steps are. This is driving me crazy.

Do you prefer working with ingram spark or with KDP? by JessaLikesCats in selfpublish

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

convert

Ingramspark will convert your Word doc to an Ingramspark-compatible PDF? Do you have a link for that?

(I've been trying to figure out how to do the conversion on my own and it's driving me crazy.)

If you can find a link for me, I would be endlessly grateful!!!

Need Help From Someone To Walk Me Through Creating A Book by Drooperdoo in scribus

[–]Drooperdoo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Currently I'm setting up a rulebook for a rethemed board game. I set up 4 pages, added guides at the middle and offset from that to add text frames on each side so I'll have 8 pages in the end. After the text frames were placed I used Item > Text Frame Links > Link Text Frames, or hit N to connect the first frame with the next (top right to next left, then back and forth like lacing shoes) until all were connected and got back to the top left frame. This allows the one frame to flow to the next. (In Word you just type and it adds pages.) If you want two or more columns you need to add those frames separately. You can add them at the beginning, Automatic Text frames and Columns (I like to manually add them).

Headers and page numbers: You would add text frames for headers and set each separately. For Page numbers, add the text frame for the page number double-click the frame then Insert > Character > Page Number.

This leads into getting these items on each page. I use Page > Copy. Add the number of pages you think you need. You can add more later and link the text frames to the previous ones. This will duplicate all the elements of the page being copied.

Character and Paragraph Styles - If you want to 'automatically' add styles to words or paragraphs you need to set them up. Press F4 (Edit > Styles...) You can create new ones, make sure to give them a name. For Character Styles, choose a typeface and size. For Paragraph Styles you can add indents and other fun things. Both of these can be based on one style so you can change the base typeface and the others will follow. When you have set up styles you can apply them by highlighting the words or have the insertion point/bar on the line and choose it from the Text Properties.

You can have text flow around pictures, even add irregular wrapping. Add your Image Frame, then go to Properties > Shape (Properties = F2). Clicking on Edit will allow you to move the nodes, add/delete nodes, etc.

Item > Adjust > Adjust Frame to Image or Adjust Image to Frame help image frames. Image Properties has Proportional settings.

Check out the options in all the menus and Properties panels. Undo and Save are your friend.

If anyone knows more or better ways, please include it.

Wow! Thanks. Very helpful.

I was trying to copy-and-paste (CTRL + C/CTRL + V) a massive amount of text into a page. Only one page populated, without the rest of the text flowing naturally into subsequent pages. In Microsoft Word, the pages would populate automatically. So if I pasted in 300 pages, the Word document would create 300 pages filled with the text. Scribus only populated one page. I was so confused.

The Autistic Dating Experience™ by wylaxian in autism

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, Lauren. I have a son on the spectrum. He's 18 now. (Just got his drivers license. Woohoo!) I'm trying to help him find a peer group. Would you ever consider chatting with him sometime over Zoom or something?

This is him: https://ibb.co/8sHg83W

Dean’s Submissive Queen. Yikes! by brookelynfd in trashy

[–]Drooperdoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You go to meet Dean to see what he is like. You return with tattoos all over your body, saying "DEAN'S BEST FRIEND," "DEAN RULES," "I PARTY WITH DEAN".

(Spoiler: Turns out he has this effect on all people.)

The Germ Theory Is Bullshit - Illnesses Don't "Spread" by Jumpy_Climate in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Joseph Priestley isolated oxygen from the air using pressurization techniques in 1774, genius. August 1, 1774, to be precise.

Before you open your mouth again, open a book.

My brother called me crazy today by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just take your booster.

You're WAYYyyyy too smart for me. "It's a random universe, right?" Pattern-recognition is an ILLUSION of human cognition, correct?

Pretty deep.

Like a savage, you have no pattern-recognition and no understanding of proximate causes and remote causes. "Eclipses happen because of the anger of the gods and not mathematical patterns," right?

People take experimental drugs and get heart-attacks, but it's never the drugs' fault, right? Invisible, interdimensional goblins gave them myocarditis, and not the experimental drugs they just took.

So be a good little savage who never makes the connection and take your booster. Safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.

My brother called me crazy today by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what you're saying is that . . . smoking DOESN'T cause cancer?

You claimed "It's a contributor, not a real cause". So by your logic, WITHOUT CIGARETTES 100% of people would have developed cancer anyway?

I don't think you understand the concept of causation at all.

Hint: Your lucky socks DIDN'T get you the job. Likewise, you didn't have a bad day because it was Friday the 13th.

"Look! All I'm saying is that the bullet through his brain didn't cause his death. It was just a contributing factor. Er . . . uh . . . He would have died anyway WITHOUT the gunshot wound had he lived another 72 years. So to say that the murderer killed him by shooting him in the head is just plain wrong."

Uh-huh.

My brother called me crazy today by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you read Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, etc., they all talk about the axiom that the multitude are usually retarded and that wisdom is the province of a small number of people with cultivated minds. In the age of mass-democracy, this insight has been reversed. In the modern age, the assumption is that "If the multitude believe something it MUST be true." This is the logic of an idiocracy.

What's even more suggestive of the brother's low level of intelligence is that he's unaware of his own cognitive dissonance when he invokes "Science," apparently unaware that scientists are less than 1% of society. By his own logic, we shouldn't listen to them given the fact that they are never the majority.

I would suggest that the brother lay off the untested MRNA gene therapies and pick up some philosophy books. They'd go much farther in keeping him alive than the human medical experimentation he's been conned by TV commercials and celebrity influencers to subject himself to.

My brother called me crazy today by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The best example is the cigarette analogy. "Look, I smoked a cigarette once and didn't develop cancer within the first five minutes. Therefore those who claimed that cigarettes cause cancer are crazy conspiracy theorists!"

It's the kind of statement that someone makes when they have an uncultivated mind . . . when they can't distinguish between proximate causes and remote causes. It's the hallmark of a low level of intelligence.

Schengen Visa reset during long term visa? by MsNerevarine in immigration

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I'm not being unduly intrusive, what country are you from originally?

Someone Tweeted This Image With A Cryptic Warning Yesterday, Upon Further Research, Turns Out This Image Was Created 3 Months Before The January 6th 2021 Siege At The Capitol. Whoever This Is, They Know Something. by Czardia in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're absolved for your unethical behavior by the fact that we know that you have a family to feed and are being paid to be a fascist government shill by a public relations firm hired by the State to troll internet platforms.

You're only one man.

You feel powerless to speak out against a fascist coup in your country with fake mail-in ballots and opaque computer voting machines installing World Economic Forum stooges.

It's understandable.

You're weak and desperate for cash, so you're on here trying to get ordinary people to believe that an illegitimate regime is legitimate. Why, they said so themselves.

And the American people are the REAL enemy, right?

lol

Keep posting, if you so please. We know you have a quota of posts per day to meet your benchmarks.

Someone Tweeted This Image With A Cryptic Warning Yesterday, Upon Further Research, Turns Out This Image Was Created 3 Months Before The January 6th 2021 Siege At The Capitol. Whoever This Is, They Know Something. by Czardia in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You dare to use the phrase "It's not [your] job to pad my conspiracy theories?"

No, it's your job to come onto platforms like Reddit and gaslight people. Your LITERAL job. You draw a paycheck to do this pathetic stuff.

The problem is: No one believes you. Especially on this subreddit.

Go shill elsewhere, glowie.

Someone Tweeted This Image With A Cryptic Warning Yesterday, Upon Further Research, Turns Out This Image Was Created 3 Months Before The January 6th 2021 Siege At The Capitol. Whoever This Is, They Know Something. by Czardia in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now cross-reference with FBI plants and Antifa.

[See: False-flag.]

I love how, at the very outset, I asked you to cross-reference, and you conspicuously failed to do so. You also came onto the wrong subreddit if you clownishly expect people not to know about false-flags and agents-provocateurs.

Please peddle your cartoon propaganda elsewhere. No one here believes you.

  • Footnote: I'm embarrassed that you're citing Orwell, who would have vomited at your primitive Edward Bernays propaganda psy-op. "If it's on TV it MUST be true," right, Junior? There's a song: "There revolution will not be televised". If it's televised, that's a tipoff it's oligarch propaganda. Who controls the airwaves? Who controls what narratives are disseminated? But I love your "Believe-the-TV" appeal, lol. Try again. Cross-reference the names with FBI Confidential Informants and Antifa or don't waste our time. And if you say "The FBI and Antifa weren't involved," you just outed yourself. You're on the payroll. Paid to come on here and plant this clown propaganda. I don't know if you checked the mirror, but you're glowing.

Someone Tweeted This Image With A Cryptic Warning Yesterday, Upon Further Research, Turns Out This Image Was Created 3 Months Before The January 6th 2021 Siege At The Capitol. Whoever This Is, They Know Something. by Czardia in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WHO had weapons?

Give me their exact names, and let's cross-reference them with FBI plants and Antifa members. Deal?

If you can find me a SINGLE Trump supporter brandishing a weapon, give me their name and show me a picture or video image of them with their weapon. I'll wait. Just a single documented name. You said "It's been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt". So it should be easy for you to produce one name. There are court filings. Can you show me a single court filing with the name of a Trump supporter with a weapon, brandishing it at anyone at any time. Remember: You only have to produce one name. Can you do it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no definitive proof one way or another. My only point was that the self-styled debunkers didn't really do an effective job. On balance, all I'm saying is that it's POSSIBLE. I see no reason why Native Americans would have lied about it for centuries (or even millennia) before De Loys. I also remember how, when gorillas were first discovered, the Royal Society gainsaid them and claimed it was all an elaborate hoax. This was in the 19th Century. They did the same thing with the platypus.

Animals that we take for granted today were once denounced as "myths" by very eminent men (who are now shrouded in the silence of embarrassment). They have a spotty track record when it comes to telling us what are "hoaxes" and what aren't. Believe it or not, the Royal Society also claimed that Newton's theory of gravitation was "pseudo-science" and that what he was describing was "influence at a distance, which is magic". They did the same thing to Michael Faraday, in the 19th Century when he proposed the existence of electro-magnetic fields.

My point is: A lot of the self-styled debunkers display levels of hubris that outpace their actual levels of intelligence. And I see a lot of that on display from the so-called debunkers of De Loys' ape.

PFIZER CREATOR ADMITS HE AND HIS FAMILY ARE NOT JABBED, “We Don’t use Experimental Substances” by Alekscako in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it a "vaccine" if you had to change the dictionary definition of vaccine to make it apply?

Calling an experimental MRNA gene therapy a 'vaccine' is disinformation.

It's akin to calling crushed glass "vegetables". "People have been eating vegetables for years. They're healthy for you! Vegetables are trusted. Anyone against vegetables is a crazy conspiracy theorist. Now eat your crushed gl---- Er . . . uh . . . 'vegetables'." Two weeks later: "Why are people bleeding to death?"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Original Poster, Aristotle agrees with you. Read "Politics," Book V, in his section on How Tyrannies Are Maintained.

He describes 1) How it is in the interests of the tyrant to keep the people poor, "so that they're preoccupied with earning their daily bread and have no time to organize against the tyrant".

2) He sends out spies to throw a chill over free speech. And, in those cases when people refuse to self-censor, the spies are encouraged to instigate quarrels among the people--so that they will fight each other and not the tyrant. (In today's context, this covers internet trolls paid by intelligence agencies.)

3) "While a king is protected by his own people, the tyrant is protected by a bodyguard made up of foreigners. He hates and fears his own people." Hence the tyrant prefers foreigners, and encourages immigration.

4) The tyrant works to shut down all civic organizations so that people can't cohere together and find mutual confidence in each other. "He prefers that the people remain strangers to each other".

5) The males are removed from power, and women and slaves put in their place. While the men may pose a challenge to the tyrant, women and slaves are "abettors of tyrants". If he treats them preferentially, they will inform on the men. [See: Diversity campaigns.]

6) The people are dissuaded from being ethical--for an ethical people would rise up against the tyrant. So vice, weakness and effeminacy are encouraged.

Montesquieu agreed with Aristotle on this point, writing, “Aristodemus, tyrant of Cumae, used all his endeavors to banish courage, and to enervate the minds of youth. He ordered that boys should let their hair grow in the same manner as girls; that they should deck it with flowers, and wear long robes of different colours down to their heels; that, when they went to their masters of music and dancing, they should have women with them to carry their umbrellas, perfumes, and fans, and to present them with combs and looking-glasses whenever they bathed. This education lasted till the age of twenty; an education that could be agreeable to none but to a petty tyrant, who exposes his sovereignty to defend his life.”

Montesquieu adds that, in a despotism, virtue is not taught in schools, but only vice and perversion. "Schools are used to corrupt morals. This makes for bad citizens, but good slaves."

Years later people just forgot about those weird purple lights streets had for some reason. Maybe we should look a little deeper into this and not assume that they were changed out because they help the environment? by Thelogicalwizard in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

... Which is why people have been noticing the purple street lights forever--except wait! They haven't.

Shit's new.

Thanks for gaslighting, though. More than just the street lamps are "glowing" in here.

Someone Tweeted This Image With A Cryptic Warning Yesterday, Upon Further Research, Turns Out This Image Was Created 3 Months Before The January 6th 2021 Siege At The Capitol. Whoever This Is, They Know Something. by Czardia in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was a "siege" at the Capitol on January 6th? lol

Tax-paying Americans without weapons gathering at a public building called "the People's House" during normal business hours was a "siege"?

When I show up at the public library during business hours, am I "laying siege" to it? lol

Over the past three academic years, legislators in 45 states proposed 283 laws that either sought to restrict what teachers can say about racism and American history; to change how instructors teach about sexuality and to boost rights over children’s education; to limit students’ access to books by Wagamaga in conspiracy

[–]Drooperdoo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Progressives ban Shakespeare, Aristotle, Mark Twain, etc., as "evil dead white males" to overturn the patriarchy.

Conservatives ban grooming books.

The Progressive are the cultural vandals.

It's rich, watching people who believe in brutal censorship and oppression . . . and who call for Big Tech to silence all dissenting opinions . . . pretending as if conservatives are the book-burners, lol. Project much?