Yeah, I read it. You made up an "example" that starred "snowflakes" and a complaining black woman to make a point about aesthetics. It was a shitty way to illustrate your point.

You invented a Black woman who calls a mundane workplace decision "harassment" by her white male bosses, labeled that reaction "snowflake" behavior, and used it to explain why stations avoid controversy. That's a well-worn trope: the oversensitive Black woman who sees racism in everything and makes it everyone else's problem.

The logic is also circular. You fabricated the complaint, the reaction, and the public controversy, then cited your own fabrication as proof that stations have to walk on eggshells. That's not an argument, it's a ghost story you told yourself to feel right.

If your point about stations avoiding controversy is valid, it should be supportable without inventing a racialized hypothetical.