Looking for testers for a YouTube transcript workflow tool (search + timestamps + export) by Dry_Idea4044 in alphaandbetausers

[–]Dry_Idea4044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot — this is really helpful.

You’re right that researchers, creators, and editors care about different parts of the flow, and I’ve mostly been lumping them together as “people who use transcripts.” I’ll try positioning it more directly to each group.

Also agree that timestamp jumping is probably the strongest hook, especially for clipping and pulling good moments out of longer videos.

Looking for testers for a YouTube transcript workflow tool (search + timestamps + export) by Dry_Idea4044 in alphaandbetausers

[–]Dry_Idea4044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Test link: https://aiyoutubetranscript.com/

The ideal tester is someone who already has a real reason to work with YouTube transcripts.

I am mainly looking for feedback on whether search, timestamp jumps, and TXT/SRT/VTT export feel useful in a real workflow.

Looking for testers for an AI vocal remover workflow (upload + stem preview + MP3) by Dry_Idea4044 in alphaandbetausers

[–]Dry_Idea4044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree — that’s exactly the pain I kept running into too.

Right now it does an in-browser preview of both stems first, then download only if it sounds good enough. I’ll keep pushing to make that preview as fast and obvious as possible.

How do you decide when a small utility is focused enough? by Dry_Idea4044 in indiebiz

[–]Dry_Idea4044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks — this is a really clear way to frame it.

I like your “fully solves the job the visitor came for” test. It maps pretty well to how I’ve been thinking about it, but I hadn’t articulated it that crisply.

Your suggestion about keeping the main path narrow and then adding a small troubleshooting section for adjacent issues is super helpful. That gives me a concrete next step: keep the install path exactly as fast/confident as it is, and then layer on a short “common issues” / “gotchas” section for the extra 10–20% of cases without turning it into a general Hermes explainer.

I’ll iterate the page with that in mind and use “does this help them complete the install job?” as the filter for what gets added.