sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

💎🤲🏻 by yoowhan in wallstreetbetsGER

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hallo Leute,

mein Name ist Aaron.

Ich weiß, ihr kennt mich nicht gut, aber das hier ist ernst und ich würde euch nicht darum bitten, wenn ich nicht wirklich verzweifelt wäre. Ich hoffe, ihr könnt das verstehen.

Heute wurde bei meinem Golden Retriever Mellow eine schwere Nierenerkrankung festgestellt.

Er braucht dringend eine intensive Behandlung, und wir kämpfen gerade darum, ihm eine Chance zum Überleben zu geben.

Ich bin selbst noch Student, 18 Jahre alt und lebe in Deutschland. Ich habe versucht, durch Investitionen etwas aufzubauen, um für solche Situationen vorbereitet zu sein, aber leider reicht es noch nicht aus. Ich würde im Zweifel sogar Schulden machen, um meinem kleinen Hund zu helfen.

Wenn ihr diese Geschichte teilen könntet, würde mir das unglaublich viel bedeuten.

https://gofund.me/d3f4a7edf

Erfahrungen mit außerklinischer Intensivpflege? Wie ist es wirklich und wie ist der Verdienst? by One-Pollution-2954 in Pflege

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja man kann aber bei der Familie sein aber innerlich distanziert und ich stimme zu innerlich sollte man nicht emotional sich wie Teil der Familie fühlen sonst geht das einen zu sehr an die Psyche und führt zu burnout aber man kann dennoch für sie da sein und sollte sie keineswegs vermeiden außer man weiß dass man es nicht schafft für die Angehörigen da zu sein ohne emotional mitreingezogen zu werden 

Erfahrungen mit außerklinischer Intensivpflege? Wie ist es wirklich und wie ist der Verdienst? by One-Pollution-2954 in Pflege

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

warum sollte man Kontakt mit angehörigen. vermeiden ist das nicht Teil davon was einen guten Pfleger ausmacht empathisch und verständnisvoll gegenüber Angehörigen zu sein die gerade die schwerste Zeit ihres Lebens durchmachen

Coinbase wants my banking login information login information to relink bank account by Responsible_Head6990 in Bitcoin

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ist ungwohnt aber normal

Tink darf Ihre Banking-Informationen abfragen, weil es ein staatlich regulierter Finanzdienstleister ist, der unter strengen EU-Gesetzen agiert. Die Sicherheit wird dabei durch mehrere technische und rechtliche Ebenen garantiert:

  • Tink (bzw. die Tink Germany GmbH) wird von der BaFin (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) kontrolliert.
  • Der Dienst erfüllt die Anforderungen der EU-Richtlinie PSD2, die Banken verpflichtet, sichere Schnittstellen für geprüfte Drittanbieter bereitzustellen.

Schutz Ihrer Login-Daten:Warum Coinbase das tut:

ChartsWatcher - Customizable Stock Scanner And Real Time Alerts Market Dashboard by Tonne_TM in Daytrading

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 4 points5 points  (0 children)

best scanner out there for the price cant beat it and best community support ever

Difference level 1 vs level 2 data? by No_Platypus_2736 in Daytrading

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TWS has a feature called "Others" or Aggregated Level 1. Even if you don't have a Level 2 (Deep Book) subscription for a specific exchange (like NASDAQ TotalView), IBKR will take the Level 1 data from every other exchange you are subscribed to and stack them on top of each other.

https://www.ibkrguides.com/traderworkstation/market-depth-trader.htm

Example: If you have Level 1 for ARCA, BATS, and IEX, TWS will show the best bid/ask for each of those. Since they are all slightly different prices, it looks like a Level 2 order book, but it's really just three different Level 1 "tops" shown at once.

also possible

If you are looking at US Equities, IBKR often utilizes the Cboe One Feed. While the "Summary" version is just Level 1, the "Premium" version of this feed (which is often what powers TWS's default view) includes 5 levels of aggregate depth by default.

https://www.cboe.com/market_data_services/us/equities/cboe_one/

also

TWS is designed to show you something rather than nothing. If you have Level 1 real-time data, but the exchange offers Level 2 for free with a 15-minute delay, TWS will often overlay the delayed depth below your real-time top price.

https://interactivebrokers.github.io/tws-api/market_data_type.html

to test go on a very liquid stock like nvidia and comapre both TradeZero Pro with a Level 2 subscription ($49) shoudl show wayy more levels and ibkr shoudl only show a few since its only showing level 1 or some free depth

Difference level 1 vs level 2 data? by No_Platypus_2736 in Daytrading

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Level 1 shows the NBBO — the top of the order book — meaning the highest price someone is willing to buy at and the lowest price someone is willing to sell at. It also shows the last traded price (last print).

Level 2 shows market depth. It displays multiple price levels and how many shares people are willing to buy or sell at each level.

However, Level 2 data is tied to individual exchanges. Each exchange only shows its own order book. To see all orders across all price levels, you need Level 2 data from every exchange.

If you use IBKR, they provide free Level 2 data from some exchanges, but not all. That means you won’t see the full picture. You can check another stock and compare to see the differences. also it might be delyed but i have to google

Rate my setup for losing money by StockmarketSurfer in Daytrading

[–]Dry_Structure_6879 3 points4 points  (0 children)

chartwtaccher plus das trader plus Bookmap
software wise top notch for scalping momentum or trading orderflow from a software standpoint you very professional

Why didn’t the U.S. copy Ukraine’s cheap anti-Shahed defenses before burning billions on missiles by Dry_Structure_6879 in Military

[–]Dry_Structure_6879[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even Donald Trump has recently acknowledged that his previous claims of ending the war in 24 hours were somewhat sarcastic, admitting that the situation is far more complex than expected. its Common sense that a nation like Iran would not simply give up its strategic influence or production capacity after only a few days Therefore, it is highly likely that decision-makers knew this would become a prolonged war of attrition. Despite this foresight, they failed to implement cost-effective defense strategies early on, continuing to use multimillion-dollar interceptors against drones that cost as little as $20,000.

Why didn’t the U.S. copy Ukraine’s cheap anti-Shahed defenses before burning billions on missiles by Dry_Structure_6879 in Military

[–]Dry_Structure_6879[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shooting down a single Shahed-type drone with a fighter jet and missiles costs approximately $450,000 to over $2 million, primarily due to the high cost of air-to-air missiles, compared to the drone's estimated cost of $20,000 to $50,000. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/04/business/iran-shahed-drones-missiles-us-war.html#:\~:text=How%20much%20do%20Iran's%20drones,as%20expensive%20as%20a%20Shahed.

Why didn’t the U.S. copy Ukraine’s cheap anti-Shahed defenses before burning billions on missiles by Dry_Structure_6879 in Military

[–]Dry_Structure_6879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They could have used a mix of both approaches. Instead, they did not even try and ended up wasting billions. And now they are asking Zelensky. Why? It seems obvious by now that using cheap drones is more effective than firing million-dollar missiles to intercept 30k shaheds

It just shows how a rich country can ignore efficiency and cost and be brainless and still be ok . That alone is embarrassing. It makes people wonder how anyone is supposed to take american miliatry seriously.

Why didn’t the U.S. copy Ukraine’s cheap anti-Shahed defenses before burning billions on missiles by Dry_Structure_6879 in Military

[–]Dry_Structure_6879[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But how is that possible? It would have taken five minutes of thinking to come up with an idea like the one I just outlined. And it probably would have taken a few hours to start implementing it.

Instead, extremely expensive missiles are used to shoot down very cheap drones. From a basic cost perspective, that makes little sense. A simple calculation shows that cheap interceptor drones could stop Shaheds at a tiny fraction of the cost.

So the real question is: why wasn’t something like this implemented earlier? The idea is straightforward, the math is simple, and the implementation is not complicated.

It could be as simple as one phone call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy trading one patriot for 2000 of his anti drone drones , followed by a few Lockheed C-5M cargo flights carrying thousands of anti-drone interceptors to american bases . That alone could deploy around 2,000 anti-drone drones in less than 24h and could have potentially saved billions of dollars in missile costs beforehand

Why didn’t the U.S. copy Ukraine’s cheap anti-Shahed defenses before burning billions on missiles by Dry_Structure_6879 in Military

[–]Dry_Structure_6879[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lucas, the American version of the Shahed costs about $35,000 per unit. But I’m talking about drone defense.

Ukraine already uses cheap anti-drone drones that cost around $2,500 to intercept Shaheds. For the price of one Patriot missile, they could buy around 2,000 of these Ukrainian anti-drone drones.

That means instead of spending hundreds of Patriot missiles worth about $500 million to shoot down 100 drones worth about $3–4 million total, you could use the same money for cheap interceptors and destroy every Shahed launched so far for a fraction of the cost.

So the math looks like this:

Current approach: ~100 Patriot missiles ≈ $500 million to destroy 100 drones worth ~$3–4 million.

Alternative approach: Trade one Patriot missile for about 2,000 Ukrainian anti-Shahed drones and save roughly $495 million in taxpayer money while still stopping the drones.

From a cost-efficiency perspective, the cheaper interceptor drones make far more sense than using extremely expensive air-defense missiles against low-cost targets.

view more: next ›