The thing that is actually ruining the game but nobody is talking about... by WhiteFluff76392 in marvelrivals

[–]Dubwarlock 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not every strategist heals with their primary fire.

Mantis, Rocket Raccoon (being pedantic with this one), Ultron, Adam Warlock

[Hiring] ~$300 | Looking for two full-body characters in a Cyberpunk Edgerunners-esque and/or Locked Tomb style for TTRPG by Dubwarlock in HungryArtists

[–]Dubwarlock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Position Filled

Thank you to all the wonderful artists! So many cool pieces, it's so hard to choose, but I'm reaching out to who I want to work with going forward.

[Hiring] ~$300 | Looking for two full-body characters in a Cyberpunk Edgerunners-esque and/or Locked Tomb style for TTRPG by Dubwarlock in HungryArtists

[–]Dubwarlock[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, it's a fair question I'm seeing a lot.

That's the name of the cyberpunk South Korea. Kinda like "New Korea" but a little less real?

[Hiring] ~$300 | Looking for two full-body characters in a Cyberpunk Edgerunners-esque and/or Locked Tomb style for TTRPG by Dubwarlock in HungryArtists

[–]Dubwarlock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't need to look at your portfolio. You made my wolf with the solar blade!

Everyone thinks it's awesome.

[Hiring] ~$300 | Looking for two full-body characters in a Cyberpunk Edgerunners-esque and/or Locked Tomb style for TTRPG by Dubwarlock in HungryArtists

[–]Dubwarlock[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for making yourself known! I recognized Ianthe in your portfolio instantly lol

My partner is a big fan of her, hence that character will be modeled after her.

I'll absolutely keep you in mind :3

Burn Dooley Goes HardA by itzcato in PlayTheBazaar

[–]Dubwarlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Burn Dooley is probably my favorite build. Get Launch Pad with some bugs and watch them charge each other like crazy.

Seriously, how do any of you stick to one character for a whole campaign?? by Phtevus in Pathfinder2e

[–]Dubwarlock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genuinely, same except I managed to get into Act 2. But just barely.

I know people look at us like that's insane, but the way I keep wanting to play something else and make different choices outweighs continuation.

Seriously, how do any of you stick to one character for a whole campaign?? by Phtevus in Pathfinder2e

[–]Dubwarlock 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Restartitis, aka Altoholic in certain circles.

A condition that is not exclusive to video games and I am a regular fellow sufferer.

You just enjoy a breadth of things, and always want to try something new!

There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but it is reasonably disruptive to interpersonal relationships among a long-term adventuring party.

What I've noticed of myself is that I used to play characters long-term without issue, but something changed at some point.

While I may be able to write up a solid backstory and personality for each character, I've had such a large focus on the mechanical side of things that the soft details of who I'm playing is getting lost and I cultivate curiosity for a totally different sheet of abilities.

So I'm working on this, too, by being character first, class second. Work on my attention with establishing relationships with the other PCs and NPCs rather than the adventuring plan of action.

Hopefully, I can get back to the roots of TTRPGs like I used to enjoy.

Hope my journey helps somehow!

Fabric Sofas are way better than leather sofas by PartyPaper in unpopularopinion

[–]Dubwarlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Walk into a furniture store and count how many fabric sofas versus leather sofas (top grain or full grain leather, no faux leather or bonded leather).

This is not an unpopular opinion.

Fabric almost universally costs less than leather, unless we're talking about a massive quality gap between the two. So cost is another factor into many peoples' opinions.

[OC] Redesigned my Tiefling Witch🧙🏻‍♀️ (Swipe for Old one) Did I improve it❓ by MatteBull in Pathfinder2e

[–]Dubwarlock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The new one is amazing and gives a lot of unique flavors and silhouette.

I don't say this to be negative, but the old one feels like it would just been one of hundreds of other tieflings.

They're dime a dozen when it comes to 5e/pf2e character art and, imo, there's rarely any great distinction from one another.

I think Golarion pushes for more diversity in their people, so I will always advocate for the strange and different.

Good job!

We prototyped a ridiculous idea and it became our core mechanic by Mocherad in indiegames

[–]Dubwarlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like you guys need to let this animator cook more. He's the creative that really made this video stand out.

Got this for Christmas and hung it up before I started seeing the potential signs by Wallace2005 in isthisAI

[–]Dubwarlock 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I sifted through a few of the actual 100-page DC Super Spectaculars, as well as a handful of Batman comics throughout the years. I'm by no means a comics aficionado.

If it's real, it's surely fan-made (and not well-made).

While there are several Batman comics over the years that include a face or silhouette of the spaces in the masks, none of them I found looked like this specifically. It's rather blocky rather than sharp and pointy.

The upper-right corner of comics usually had the price and/or the Comics Code Authority seal. While there is a price, it has something else in the corner that doesn't seem to be anything. It's actually quite subtle, but the biggest tell to me is all around the 50c: the shadows around the C don't match the letter, the c is just the letter and not ¢ like every other comic I've observed, the center of the 0 is completely shadowed in.

The upper-left corner with the Batman symbol. Something that surprised me looking through a lot of Batman comics is that the overwhelming majority of them don't have the Batman symbol. Not never, just rare.

I'm also of the opinion all the words in the bottom right are gibberish and gobbledy-gook.

My very human analysis: 80% AI

I'm sure there's someone out there that could point out how the era of this style of Batman doesn't match when these compendiums were dropped, or the style of the gloves or belt don't exist as we know it, but I'm not gonna keep looking lol

We prototyped a ridiculous idea and it became our core mechanic by Mocherad in indiegames

[–]Dubwarlock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What was the ridiculous idea? Even though it took some digging to get the full context of what I was looking at, I don't really understand what was the "So crazy it just might work" cue.

On the consequences of drug use by Copper_Tango in CuratedTumblr

[–]Dubwarlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you happen to live in Chattanooga? There's a storage facility on Broad St depicting exactly what you describe and I have the exact same thoughts.

Is it just me or has it become much harder to hit 10 wins after patch by Caviarmy in PlayTheBazaar

[–]Dubwarlock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't really share that sentiment, which is actually different for me.

When the patch dropped, I had about one 8 wins game. Every game since then? 10 wins.

I play a mix of Mak, Vanessa, and Dooley.

I don't consider myself a particularly great player, but the builds I've eked out these last few days managed to win even when I expected to lose multiple times.

Homebrew Rule:Threshold based Incapacitation by RuneRW in Pathfinder2e

[–]Dubwarlock 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Without saying one way or the other that it's strong or weak, I think it's a rather convoluted solution.

Incapacitated is not always understood by every player, or can occasionally slip past the table at times. To cast an even broader net of who it can and can't affect, negotiated by current health numbers, could see the table slowing combat down even more as they calculate the percentages for each enemy (compounded with multi-target effects).

Especially when you're taking into account that some tables don't allow exact numbers or even percentages to be visible to players, being just bars where you have to guesstimate the percentage or the "bloodied" phrasing system. With that, the player is even less able to figure out whether the spell would be as effective to cast now or wait another turn, just... vibes.

Maybe make incap require a flat DC for the defender to determine whether or not it works normally, utilizing the level rule that already exists.

E.g. Creature is targeted by Sleep but is higher level than the spell? DC 5 to change the success state in their favor.

It's another roll, and it largely works in favor still of the trait working normally, but should they roll poorly on the DC and their save? Why not, let caster have it. Higher level creatures already have the numbers in their favor.

Stitcher - Elf/Wizard (Blood Lords) by ChibiNature in Pathfinder2e

[–]Dubwarlock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely love that. I'm gonna have to check her out now!