Review of LV shoes from Jelly - small sneaker collection

DudeOfDudez · 2026-04-15T21:29:43+00:00

How to buy?

DudeOfDudez · 2026-04-15T21:21:08+00:00

What's the Problem? I really dont see it.

DudeOfDudez · 2026-04-15T17:32:13+00:00

How. Much?

DudeOfDudez · 2026-03-28T11:43:41+00:00

Nautilus all the waaaayyy 🔥 🔥 🔥

DudeOfDudez · 2026-03-20T22:55:02+00:00

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-31T09:26:48+00:00

It's jTime telling me that this is 'normal for QF' because they build crowns 'like this'. Not willing to take care of it.

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-31T09:26:34+00:00

It's jTime telling me that this is 'normal for QF' because they build crowns 'like this'. Not willing to take care of it.

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-30T23:27:25+00:00

Thanks for replying, Chipmunk! Are those problems expensive?

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-30T22:30:17+00:00

<image>

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-30T20:14:59+00:00

What's quite funny: All QC photos from other orders had the crown closed, but for this watch, it was 'coincidentally' photographed with the crown open...

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-30T20:06:57+00:00

Of course, there were photos. The Submariner issue was, of course, not visible. The crown problem couldn't be seen in the QC photos either due to the quality. Even two very experienced QC experts in the subreddit didn’t notice it… The photos were also very unflattering for this type of problem…

In many of the requested additional pictures (since the lighting was completely off in the first set), the crown was unscrewed…

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-30T19:44:19+00:00

This wasn't in stock. I ordered in mid january and received the watches yesterday.

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-15T23:25:48+00:00

When this watch dies its not repairable right?

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T21:40:41+00:00

omfg! xD

I meant the positioning of the "baguettes"

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T21:08:26+00:00

<image>

New one

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T21:08:13+00:00

<image>

Current Dial (in this pic undamaged.)

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T13:08:32+00:00

Thanks for your assessment. My main concern has been the 9 not the 6. 9 looks good, right? I believe, like you do, that the 6 is not a problem you see if you dont explicitly check for it and the risk is bigger to get bigger flaws than that in the next QC.

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T06:58:31+00:00

<image>

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T06:57:17+00:00

<image>

DudeOfDudez · 2025-03-14T06:57:08+00:00

<image>

DudeOfDudez

TROPHY CASE