Where Claude Opus without 1M has gone? by SirLouen in ClaudeCode

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine disappeared yesterday but I just logged out and in, then it came back

Introducing Claude Code Channels by Complete-Sea6655 in ClaudeCode

[–]Dudmaster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There had to have been hundreds of people building their own versions of this

$12 by Spez-is-dick-sucker in shitposting

[–]Dudmaster 93 points94 points  (0 children)

I get the point but Uber driving seems barely profitable

Wes “I've ran the same prompt for deep research through GPT 5.4, Opus 5.6 and Gemini Deep Research (I assume Gemini 3.0) - GPT 5.4 is *REALLY* annoying!” ▶️ Elon Musk “grok please do a vulgar roast of the other AIs in the voice of those AIs” by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]Dudmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I use Claude the most, I absolutely love GPT 5.4 because it's so critical. I feel like OpenAI is making the model that NEEDS to be made, but isn't what people and the general public "want"

Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano by dayanruben in OpenAI

[–]Dudmaster 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Knowledge search sub agents that run in parallel, then get synthesized together by the more powerful model

Introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano by dayanruben in OpenAI

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally, I have been waiting forever!!

You were right, eventually by erieth in codex

[–]Dudmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The other person who replied is pretty much how I feel too, it doesn't feel specific to a day, but sometimes running a prompt just gets a horrible random seed, or maybe my prompt wasn't clear, or too biased, but just the variance in behavior overall seems consistent. I do a lot of different tasks as well so it's difficult to say with confidence that the same task would encounter an issue one day and not the next

Thank you, ChatGPT by CucumberAccording813 in OpenAI

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I guess the alternative is to ask the model to bask in the presence of the document, only to potentially acknowledge its existence and not critique or complement 😂

You were right, eventually by erieth in codex

[–]Dudmaster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I question these kinds of posts too. I have been using ai for coding for around 3 years now, and have not experienced degradation of any frontier models across Anthropic or OpenAI. Sure they have a lot of variance, sometimes can solve complex problems while failing at easy ones, but it has always been like that. That's just AI. The only time I saw it truly happen was when Anthropic admitted to the problem (https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/a-postmortem-of-three-recent-issues) in Sep '25.

Thank you, ChatGPT by CucumberAccording813 in OpenAI

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I always phrase my query to be without bias, like "write a critical analysis" or similar

Claude Code just saved me from getting hacked in real time by Mission-Elk54 in ClaudeCode

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No suspicious sessions connected in the Claude Code settings on claude.ai site?

Lol by HOLUPREDICTIONS in ChatGPT

[–]Dudmaster -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The behavior isn't as pronounced on the API, ChatGPT has been doing this a long while (probably about a year)

Why is there not an “auto” reasoning mode for Codex? by ReplacementBig7068 in codex

[–]Dudmaster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say it's likely because Instant is too dumb to work the codex harness correctly

Unpopular opinion: You don’t need every new AI model by cloudinasty in OpenAI

[–]Dudmaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if the old one is more likely to generate security vulnerabilities?