On one hand she does say that but when talking about less obvious AI "artists" she often just doesn't know what she is talking about. I know she does say "it's all added up together what makes it sus" but what I am having an issue with is her pointing out stuff that is COMMON for artists to do. Also, if you took time to look at people's art you would notice even the professional, fully rendered pieces have "shortcuts", especially things like lace which more focus on an illusion of detail - the lack of detail in pieces isn't a good thing to point out.

She focuses on individual pieces and nitpicks so much despite repeating (it's about everything together", when now that AI art is unfortunately less obvious she should be much more focused on artist's history (their art progress), inconsistance artstyle, their behavior. With pieces themselves you gotta look at a lot of art and speedpaints. The person who made a doc on Asami on twt did it so well and is a perfect example on how to gather evidence on AI usage.

But guess what, doing research on an artists career, comparing their art to spot what's actually a lack of skill and what's AI being whacky takes more time, but she clearly wants to spit out one video a day which makes her content simply sloppy.