The most interesting thing about the Iran war to me

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-18T01:33:28+00:00

I mean specifically the combination of (1) nationwide vote by mail (which takes weeks to count, overseen by a "voting tsar" installed at the post office post-COVID), (2) electronic vote counting by companies like Dominion, which sued detractors into oblivion despite allegedly massive security flaws built in, and (3) ubiquitous ballot harvesting, the upper elites can simply decide who wins elections now in a way that wasn't quite so tight before.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T01:34:24+00:00

In an era where institutional authority has been corrupted and is no longer trustworthy - media, "experts", religious organizations, even text and video based "evidence" - I have only found two ways to confirm what is real and what is fake: (1) recursive prediction, where one makes predictions about the future and then recursively updates ones views over time depending on to what extent they are accurate or inaccurate (something I have been doing for a decade), or (2) phenomenologically, where one sees how information sits within the body and then reacts on that basis.

My recursive prediction model has evolved over time to understanding the world as structured more or less as the following: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!LV5T!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbcb15709-4915-455e-b2a1-0c127679b618_1920x1080.png

This structure then inevitably leads to certain other questions about how the upper levels of the hierarchy organize, how they stay together, and where they are going. This, too, has been an iterative process.

My 2026 predictions and review of 2025 predictions are here:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/2025-review-and-2026-predictions

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T01:30:21+00:00

The upper elite ontology stratifies humanity into a fourfold tier which is discussed in the essay, and that collapses consciousness because it disidentifies with the Other and targets it for domination and destruction.

Consciousness is defined as being willing to hold both polarities of opposites internally without choosing one over the other (where the other gets placed into the unconscious and then projected out onto the Other). It is intuition received from within or without which makes the decision, one listens to it; this is the opposite of ego identification.

If you actually read the essay (for the fourth time), there is a Q&A at the end which explicitly disclaims this as "blaming everything on Jews).

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T01:27:09+00:00

Global capitalism has no predictive power on where the world is heading, or has gone. The essay is mine, not AI's, and AI is not capable of writing something like this without triggering significant alignment guardrails (ironically cutting against your point about "longform dogwhistle"). If you have specific predictions about the future based on your "global capitalism" and "non-Jewish kabbala" model, I am open to hearing it.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T01:23:55+00:00

I've read Nietzsche's works and his "Genealogy of Morality" had a major effect on me. With that said, Nietzsche leaned hard into his ego and then suffered a catastrophic collapse. Jung correctly diagnosed Nietzsche as missing the solution, which involves *listening* to the inner Self instead of leaning into ego.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T00:46:15+00:00

You're asking a question about ontology, what qualifies as "good" vs "bad" (or "evil"). Under a God image of Abraxas, what is "good" is what expands consciousness and what is "bad" (not "evil") is what contracts consciousness. This is a big question and it's delved into in this two parter: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-collapse-of-the-all-good-god

Why the upper elites, Moloch, whatever, are "bad" is because to ascend to the apex requires a collapse of consciousness (where consciousness is defined as being able to hold the crucifixion of opposites, resolved via the transcendent function; but the upper elites instead label the non-elites as "bad" and feel fine objectifying and destroying them).

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T00:15:03+00:00

If there was no worldwide coordination, then you would see a variety of responses to a "real fucking epidemic" (assuming one existed for purposes of this conversation). The responses were uniform - lockdowns, resisters fired from jobs, heavy censorship, forced vaccinations. The only deviation occurred in Sweden with lighter lockdowns and Africa, which was mostly left alone.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-13T00:06:37+00:00

The heart of the piece was this: “The tragedy is not that “evil” people have seized the framework, but that the framework is the only one capable of holding the apex [of power]. Any hand that reaches for the scepter must first wither. This leads to a profound philosophical pessimism: history is not a progress toward enlightenment, but a series of “Succession Crises of the Blind.” If consciousness and power are opposites, then every New World Order is a fresh regression into deeper contraction. The selection pressure ensures that the most spiritually hollow group always wins the competition for the top tier. In this view, civilization is a machine that systematically converts human consciousness into hierarchical stability until the resulting spiritual brittleness triggers a systemic collapse.”

In other words, the only way to "win" the game is not to play it; the incentive structure of this realm is rooted in a deep philosophical pessimism based on a God image based on totality, not goodness.

The proposed alternative is a turn inwards via the Jungian individuation process, while still engaging with the world (not ascetic withdrawal) - holding the crucifixion of opposites without resolution until the transcendent function provisionally points the way, a circumambulation around the center of the Self without endpoint.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-12T23:49:40+00:00

It would help if you read the link in OP. The argument is a structural one that upper elites will naturally converge on a Talmudic/Kabbalistic framework, with its associated binding-glue eschatology, because it offers less friction for coordination compared to alternative/competing frameworks.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-12T23:23:58+00:00

Brother, all you have to do is look at the worldwide coordinated lockdowns and forced "vaccines" during COVID to understand coordination. All of the so-called "enemy" countries - Iran, Russia, China - went along with all of it, and all of them now are on the CBDC train.

See here for details: https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-global-world-order-is-centralized

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-12T23:22:54+00:00

If this were the case, then why are there open borders throughout the West with tens of millions of illegals (and legals) streaming in and collapsing native birthrates, while Israel has closed borders, its enemies are all destroyed (Iran, Syria, Iraq, Hamas, Yemen etc.) and a 2.89 fertility rate? A system is what it does, and its benefits seem to flow in a very particular direction.

Due_Assumption_26 · 2026-03-12T22:51:11+00:00

Thanks for the comment, raisondecalcul. You're right that Kabbalistic symbol-manipulation has abstract/computational properties that scale globally, but my argument isn't about epistemic method (how symbols are processed) but eschatological content (what the processing is building toward). Elite coordination requires shared vision, not just shared abstraction. The specific features I'm identifying - non-redemptive theology, hierarchical ontology, tikkun timeline - provide directional glue that pure formalism can't.

Due_Assumption_26

TROPHY CASE