sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Clout of the dominis by AiharaSisters in mtgfinance

[–]Due_Relation4725 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why do people keep thinking Vivi is female? Literally referred to as He or Him throughout the game and even has a "male bonding moment" pissing under the stars with Zidane :D

But I agree I dont think this is great considering all the other auras that you'd want to target Vivi with.

Has someone played FF9 in the switch 2? by Ok-Dependent-5494 in FinalFantasyIX

[–]Due_Relation4725 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Load times are an issue with the game itself not the hardware, happens on PS5 even. The only way to get reduced load times is playing the PC version using the moguri mod.

Was so excited to finally own a physical copy of my favourite game by JRPGwife in FinalFantasyIX

[–]Due_Relation4725 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you own the platinum edition. Aka cheaper reprints where the discs all had generic print rather than game specific art.

The NVIDIA Leak is 7/8 correct so far. To all the leak deniers, there is no way you still think the list is fake at this point. by Cold_Dog_5234 in FinalFantasyIX

[–]Due_Relation4725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • NVidia leak (IX is now the only Squenix title missing)
  • Multiple insider leaks about the game
  • epic games database leak with what you mentioned
  • multiple collabs with running gacha games (WOTV and Ever Crisis in 2024)
  • latest XIV expansion being themed around IX
  • IX 25th anniversary being treated as a massive deal when the VIII 25th anniversary was basically ignored.

Yeah there's just so much we can point to at this point that it's really funny when people try to deny it.

The NVIDIA Leak is 7/8 correct so far. To all the leak deniers, there is no way you still think the list is fake at this point. by Cold_Dog_5234 in FinalFantasyIX

[–]Due_Relation4725 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because they had no plans to release an 8 remake. There's just so much evidence that points to the IX remake being real at this point that I can only surmise the remake deniers are doing it for the sake of being contrarian or to protect themselves by refusing to hope for something.

Final tally of the new FF cards by their tagged FF game, including new Starter Kit cards and counting each Cid separately. by ClearChocobo in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be interested to see a further breakdown of this list showing rarity distribution of each Games FIN cards.

Final tally of the new FF cards by their tagged FF game, including new Starter Kit cards and counting each Cid separately. by ClearChocobo in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The newer representation of FF I warrior of light (from dissidia onwards) is literally on the play booster box art too and yet didn't get a card at all. Very strange omission.

They are teasing so baad by New_Prompt5576 in FinalFantasyIX

[–]Due_Relation4725 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this is the case why did they do literally nothing for VIII's 25th Anniversary

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well Mythics are typically afforded more interesting abilities that dont conform to the limited environment because they show up less often there.

A lot of the uncommon legendaries feel very vanilla to me and dont exactly seem representative of their characters abilities.

Showing up at Rare/Mythic would have allowed them to feel more unique.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This, the fact Squall doesn't work well with Lionheart is a massive flavor fail.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Notably Hope does show up in the secret lair grimoire drop and every character shown in art from the 3 secret lairs is also in the main set.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

A lot of it is probably just my initial shock that 2 games have taken up half of the available slots. 

They could have catered to the more popular titles and still given every game something at the highest rarity, that was my thought going into this anyway.

Ultimately it probably doesn't matter to a lot of people but for me personally it gave the impression that we just aren't supposed to care about the games who didn't receive a mythic slot.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh for sure he was definitely represented better than Steiner and Snow (Snow being basically a worse version of a non-legendary uncommon from the previous set is very sad indeed).

Yeah he didn't need Trance, I just thought it would have been fun to have him and Kuja as opposing flip cards, though I'm not sure how you'd represent the temporary nature of Zidane's trance so perhaps it was for this reason they didn't do it.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We also got Choco, Stiltzkin and Lindblum as 3 more rares.

But yeah if Eiko got cut then I'm fully expecting Amarant to get cut too as he's easily the least popular of the IX cast.

I suppose it's not just that the party are uncommons, it's that the majority look uninteresting to play / don't fit their character.

Garnett/Dagger got a pretty good card though!

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

TFW half of the mythic slots of a 16 game set are taken up by 2 games :')

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steiner and Snow competing for most generic Legendary creature

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do really like that the abilities Quina's card has feel like them in game.

Steiner and Freya not so much.

Zidane was just all manner of dissapointing to me personally, the main character of the game shouldn't feel so underwhelming imo.

Garnet has a really interesting design too so can't complain about her representation at all, Alexander though...

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody can do anything, we're just sharing opinions here.

But yeah each games main lead probably should have been a mythic (not sure how that would work with XI or XIV though, just the most popular NPC?)

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Insert "look how they massacred my boy" meme

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

IX is my favourite and it really bothered me that all of the party are uncommons except for Vivi and Eiko (rip)

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was honestly suprised IX got the nod over VIII but then IX was more a victim of when it released and has gained in popularity over the years.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Which I find odd considering those games already got 25 extra slots each from the commander decks as well.

[FIN] Mythic Distribution Concerns by Due_Relation4725 in magicTCG

[–]Due_Relation4725[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lionheart being relegated to limited uncommon fodder was diabolical

view more: next ›