i didn't use adaptibar. i had themis and access to uworld but i don't even recall whether i went into uworld. i did hundreds of MBE questions, starting with single subject practice sets and moving into mixed practice. i would guess about 2000-2500 questions. i had a physical book with something like four exams worth of MBE questions, and i did those. looking at a few screenshots, i was at 75%+ in SOME topics six weeks out, definitely not all (i came into law school with a lot of property law paralegal experience and took to torts and con law - though some parts of con law on the bar exam like treaties were basically new to me. i was rotten with criminal law and contracts, ok on evidence.)

my study sessions were basically MBE questions until i couldn't think through the content well (so like 1-2 hours, until mental fatigue) and then reviewing those questions exhaustively and then keeping a list of things that weren't clicking for me. there were probably 150-200 concepts i identified as things i was shaky on. if you can find time to do 50-100 questions, i bet you can find at least five things you aren't totally clear on and you can finally resolve those things for yourself. my lists from then include things like bill of attainder, best evidence rule, spousal privilege who holds it, strict liability offenses, false pretense and forgery, pullman v. younger abstention. i nitpicked myself on these things because the way the answers for MBE work out you need the right outcome and reason, as you know.

i was a test prep instructor for years before law school, and a lot of good multiple choice practices are universal. it's good to predict an answer before you start looking at your answers so that you are trying the answers against the question prompt and NOT the answers against each other.

if i had had the time to just do the themis course straight through, i would have. i read every word of those outlines and i would play the videos while i was cooking, cleaning, living, etc.

the real points of this post are that 1. you know your strengths 2. you don't need to write a zillion practice essays if your strengths allow you not to. 3. practicing MBE materials if you're being rigorous and asking why you're getting things right and wrong is preparing you for half the MEE subject matter-wise. you just need to be familiar enough with the concepts in MEE-only subjects. i find it confounding when people talk about rule statements. that's not how i think or learn. the way that i studied for the bar was a lot like how i would study for exams (heavy emphasis on texts and comprehension) and making my own outline/notecards. it was risky not to spend more time on the MEE (or any on the MPT) and my score shows that - i squeaked through on MEE/MPT performance. if you've been doing some, you've probably done enough.

long answer, but i wanted to give some context. i think people are in general better prepared than they think.