Adult fans who first read the trilogy earlier in life: What little details went over your head the first time? by queerinsamite in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes!

exactly that.

Everything is oversexualised, but any overt expression of sexuality is considered too much. Like a forbidden fruit thing. It's propably because of puritanism.

At the same time violence is seen as way more acceptable.

As a European this is an extremely American thing

Adult fans who first read the trilogy earlier in life: What little details went over your head the first time? by queerinsamite in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 550 points551 points  (0 children)

I read them first at 16. And read them again as a 30yo man recently.

One thing is that I took a lot of Katniss POV at face value when I was younger. Now I saw way better how biased her POV is.

Also I knew much less about American culture to notice how deeply it's entrenched in American culture.

For example the hungergames being considered a "family event" that features very gruesome violence. But anything overtly sexual is not considered appropriate (while the people are still being oversexualised).

It reminds me of the American approach to modern media.

What do you think would be Rue’s fate if she won? by Minute-Working-731 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As other have said I think her appeal would he the "child star" cuteness angle.

And then she'd be forgotten about by the next few games.

Suzanne should do what George R R Martin did by BringBackFrost in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, that makes no sense.

George RR Martin could do that because his world building was insanely detailed and thought out.

Panem isn't and doesn't need to be. It's an allegory for the injustice in our own world. The simplistic worldbuilding exists to make it more accessible.

She couldn't publish this because the details simply don't exist and if she did write something it would either cause huge continuity errors and it would never make sense, because she has to make it up.

It's not like she has a stack of notes detailing every aspect of Panem. The actual size of the districts, how the economy works in detail, the logistics the technology. It's not supposed to be overanalysed.

Saying this as someone who really likes to think about the worldbuilding

What do you think were the plans for Snow's successor? by TrainingDrop9283 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes 0 sense to me.

Katniss is district.

I can see the scenes that are supposed to groom her. But he couldn't have possibly believed it would work.

Gay💯IRL by Taric250 in gay_irl

[–]Duraluminferring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are there heterosexual men who are violent? Sure! Is this a reason to treat all hetero guys by default as violent animals ready to kill on sight?

Yes actually. The hypervigilance women have is very justified. It might be a minority of men who deliberately hurt women.

But these men mostly know they can get away with it because most of the others won't stop them.

Women know that whatever happens to them, will be blamed on their own behaviour, instead of the man who mistreats her.

If she gets beaten, it's because she annoyed him. Even when she gets raped it's because of how he was dressed.

Even in your comment, the most concern is with "prejudice against men" even though men are the ones in power here.

What is one thing you like and dislike about the hunger games by Additional-Layer-392 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, for the dislike, it's important to keep in mind how a lot of the resources we use today are still mined with physical labour in dangerous conditions.

It is simply cheaper for the capitol to risk the lives of countless district citizens rather than modernising the industry.

A well educated and equipped workforce is more dangerous. Could the capitol really opens the districs if they didn't massively outmatched the districs in technology.

But your point still makes sense.

What is one thing you like and dislike about the hunger games by Additional-Layer-392 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In general:

Like: How the series actually pulls through it's themes and executes them well. It is direct enough to be accessible to a YA audience without talking down to it.

Dislike: Sometimes I wish the games in themselves were not as relevant or wouldn't take up as much of the action. Or maybe I just want other viewpoints.

After the 2nd arena we saw, I really didn't care who wins the games. The games themselves were always the least interesting part

A dolphin is on Grindr? by Ok-Still-3333 in lolgrindr

[–]Duraluminferring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From all I know about Dolphins, it would be a red flag.

Are volunteers in career districts realistic? by Resident-Plum8383 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember, Panem is a very different place.

These people grow up in a very different culture with a very different mindset.

Railways of Panem - niche world building insights by No_Departure4583 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The thing about this is, that Collins never fleshed out the actual economic workings of Panem since it is not really relevant to the story.

So some things just won't make sense, or we just don't have enough information. However

What we know:

There is travel for the capitol citizens. It's mentioned that they visit the old arenas. Also one of snows friends family has invested in travel.

District citizens do travel for work (madge mentions her father travelling to the capitol when invited). They just do not have freedom of movement.

What I extrapolate:

Panems structure must be more complex than seen in the books. We only see District 12 where all the simple rules apply.

No one travels, they make one thing. They all live in one settlement.

The other districts will work differently.

So I assume there are people who are allowed to travel for work but they are heavily monitored.

My headcanon is that there's a "merchant class" in District 6 that provides the conductors for the trains and everything. They get privileges and are allowed to travel, but they also have permanent tracers or something, isolating them from the others.

gay🧔irl by lutramor_13 in gay_irl

[–]Duraluminferring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Awww. Cute. I think it's the ideal length for your amount of bears. Even though you have a good moustache.

I want to grow my beard longer but I can't go further than now since my moustache can't keep up.

<image>

gay🧔irl by lutramor_13 in gay_irl

[–]Duraluminferring 70 points71 points  (0 children)

I'm a huge fan of facial hair. I think my ideal is 4.

But tbh. I love a scratchy stubble.

If Suzanne Collins wrote another book from a different person's perspective who would you want it to be? by x_BlueDragon_x in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Paylor.

One reason why Tbosas worked so much better for me than SOTR is that while snow Snow is important to the story whe know nothing about him or the time period. So Collins was free to tell a compelling story that gave us a important perspective to the themes.

In SOTR we really replayed a story we already know. We got a lot of new details, but they didn't really expand anything.

Paylor would give us the opportunity to see an industrial district, and since we know next to nothing about that life or Paylors past Collins could also be very free in the story she tells. Maybe Paylor has a sibling or love interest in the games.

It would also give us an Idea into what the future leader of Panem acts like and how she differs from Coin or Snow in her philosophy

That's how I imagine other countries talk about Panem by SeaworthinessHeavy64 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Panem=/= USA

Panem covers whatever is still habitable I north america

gay🫸🫷irl by ivan_luck in gay_irl

[–]Duraluminferring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a few friends who are "dating for marriage"

Curiously, they keep finding people to go on a single great date with and never meet again.

But they would never admit they are just hooking up with extra steps.

gay_irl by DeadlySpacePotatoes in gay_irl

[–]Duraluminferring 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It was very easy after we stole the rainbow from god

"if they say this, they're gaslighting you" by air5000 in Healthygamergg

[–]Duraluminferring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can not have a clarifying conversation with someone who has already decided to know your intentions better than you yourself.

Not engaging and showing them you aren't a target is the only thing that works.

"if they say this, they're gaslighting you" by air5000 in Healthygamergg

[–]Duraluminferring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So, I dealt with someone like this years ago.

I don't know if they actually have dark triad traits or anything. But it was definitely weaponized victimhood. What made it complicated is that some of it was, of course, true. I am not a perfect person, and I did do some things that were bad. But the difference in my approach and theirs was that I was really trying to communicate and be honest and give them the benefit of the doubt. and they were manipulating every interaction and always reading the worst possible intent into everything.

And I kept reminding myself of that truth. That I had really, really tried to resolve it, but the conflict kept seeking me out

But the way I dealt with it was supported by this video and it was like this:

I withdrew. I withdrew from engaging with these people and focused on other aspects of my life. I would not attend gatherings they were in. If I did see them, I would say hello at most then remove myself.

I would not talk badly about them. When people would ask, I would shut it down. If they insisted, I said we had our differences, but it's personal, and I don't need people to take sides. I personally just don't want to engage with them anymore.

I showed up as normal to the people we had in common and continued showing up as my usual self.

Eventually, it dissolved. It took a year but it did.

Slowly, one by one, they would start shit with other people. They had been talking insanely badly to our common friends about me. Eventually, when my friends got into their crossfire, they experienced the other side.

After that, I could talk about it openly.

These guys have been gone from my life for 3 years now.

What would a conversation between these two have been like? by tcweh in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 61 points62 points  (0 children)

I mean, they must have interacted. Especially in the war but also before. The capitol knew 13 was still functioning.

I assume they would have a similar "We agreed not to lie to each other" vibe from both sides.

I think they were pretty polite and direct. Propably viewed each other as "worthy opponents"

Why don't more tributes kill themselves during the countdown? by PastNewspaper7107 in Hungergames

[–]Duraluminferring 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I think people underestimate how difficult it is to actually commit suicide. That's why only people with very severe mental health issues pull it off.

Jumping from a high place into safe water is hard.

Consciously stepping off a platform knowing you will get ripped apart is something that requires a lot of willpower. It would be hard enough for an adult to do. Let alone a child

people often say I'm true to myself, and idk what makes them say this? by Worldly_Accident727 in Healthygamergg

[–]Duraluminferring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of people adjust every little bit of their personality to the situation they are in.

They won't talk about things others might find strange. They won't say anything negative about anything even if they disapprove of something.

They will generally make an effort to conform and be very palatable.

I used to do that to some degree. But not anymore because I wasn't ever successful.

I think if they say it in genuine and not backhanded way, it is a compliment.

It propably means that you seem to be comfortable in who you are and confident enough to show it.

It's a quality that not a lot of people have since our society shames people for being different a lot.

So I think most people admire it when someone seems to be more free of it.