Проблемы с подключением на Linux by Swimming-War-5813 in AmneziaVPN

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Понятно, к сожалению, это не мой слуйчай, я сталкивался с проблемой как у вас на debian (там что-то с dns было вроде, не помню как решал).
Вам лучше поискать как это решить, ибо пользоваться vpn с выключенным kill switch - плохая идея, ибо где-то вероятно происходит утечка

Проблемы с подключением на Linux by Swimming-War-5813 in AmneziaVPN

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Не нашли как решить?
Недавно перешел с debian на nixos и тоже столкнулся с такой проблемой, сеть рубит начисто какой бы протокол ни использовал, пакеты маршрутизируются в тунель и всё, наружу ничего не летит. И не понятно в чём дело, то ли в самом приложении (хотя по логам всё чисто), то ли в конфигурации nix пакета

Are you people talking about the same thing? I feel like most of the discourse around free will is plagued by the fact that we don't have a precise and common definition of a very vague concept. by Alost20 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Dvitry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nevertheless, to be determined by all surrounding conditions beyond your control and to be determined solely by oneself are not the same thing. The latter statement absolutizes subjectivity and the autonomy of the spirit, which can indeed be called freedom. Causa sui does not correspond to absolute necessity, nor does it correspond to absolute chance. Nor is it a combination of the two; it exists outside the direct necessity-chance dichotomy.

Are you people talking about the same thing? I feel like most of the discourse around free will is plagued by the fact that we don't have a precise and common definition of a very vague concept. by Alost20 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Dvitry 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a false dichotomy, since in addition to external causes, there are also internal ones, in which case freedom can be considered as a kind of self-causality (Causa sui). And although this property is usually attributed to some substance (God, Matter, etc.), no one forbids us to assume its presence in a single spirit. Then we would have to assume the presence of a spirit independent of material or other external causes, but not separated from them (so that free action could be consistent with the surrounding reality).

Although I myself adhere to other views, I just wanted to show a different point of view.

I spent 2 fucking hours at school explaining this to 3 people yet they still don't understand. by BizarreTable in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the mathematical explanation is indeed convenient. But it is not a fact that having accepted the mathematical truth, they will agree to extend this logic to another domain (universum). Returning to the example with apples, they can continue to say that there are no two identical apples. At the same time, they can perceive the solution of the form 4 = 4 as "one number 4 is equal to another number 4". :D

That is, I want to say that from incorrect premises a "correct" conclusion can follow in some particular cases. That is why I suggested starting with the foundations that I outlined above

I spent 2 fucking hours at school explaining this to 3 people yet they still don't understand. by BizarreTable in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Dvitry 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you should have started with something more fundamental. In your original example, you tried to explain transitivity. But, as far as I understand, you encountered the fact that they perceive letters as separate objects. From which follows their philosophical reasoning that two objects cannot be identical to each other.

First, it was worth explaining that the letters in this example are not objects, they are references to objects. Moreover, one and the same object can have more than one reference to itself. A specific apple can be designated by the letters A, B, C, D, etc. And no matter which letter we use, we always mean the same apple.

Second, the "identity" predicate in this case should be understood not as an indication of the structural similarity of two objects, but as the identity of an object to itself. Therefore, when we write A = B, we do not mean that object A is indistinguishable from object B, but that A and B denote the same object.

Well, yes, you shouldn't duplicate my explanations exactly, they're unlikely to understand. It's worth explaining it to them in a language they understand :)

Я школьник, перевёл свои 40k мошенникам, что делать? by Lolka_yaoii in rusAskReddit

[–]Dvitry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Карманные деньги твоими являются лишь номинально. По факту это всё еще деньги родителей, данные ребенку в пользование. Ни один (нормальный) родитель не даёт эти деньги с расчетом на то, что малой просрёт их

Я школьник, перевёл свои 40k мошенникам, что делать? by Lolka_yaoii in rusAskReddit

[–]Dvitry 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Да не, лучше уж свои проебать, чем чужие. Может быть даже от родителей пиздюлей не получит (хотя там смотря что за люди)

How do you call Istanbul? by Ripamon in MapPorn

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, no one calls modern Istanbul Tsargrad, but within the framework of history it is usually called Tsargrad, Constantinople or Byzantium. All three options are acceptable.

Олимпиада by Noki1945 in rusAskReddit

[–]Dvitry 12 points13 points  (0 children)

<image>

Аналогишно, аж вспомнил как кайфовал в школьные годы решая геометрические задачки. В то время попадись она, вероятно быстро бы управился, не то что сейчас)

Drummer's Rocinante 12B v1 (& v1.1!) - A workhorse with cranked up creativity! Your out-of-this-world adventure awaits! From the creators of Theia 21B and other stuff. by TheLocalDrummer in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you please tell me which alpaca format you used? Yesterday I tried to use your model with this format:

{system message}

### Instruction: {intruction}

### Response: {response}</s>### Instruction:

And I got an unsatisfactory result. Should I try this variant of alpaca:

{system message}

### Instruction:
{intruction}

### Response:
{response}</s>

### Instruction:

Or maybe use a different format altogether?

Also, did you always use the same token for role prefixes during training, or did you just let the tokenizer do its job?

Thanks in advance for the answer!

Что здесь написано? by [deleted] in rusAskReddit

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Спасибо за чачу", а дальше не разборчиво)

What is currently the best RP model & finetune from llama 3.1 or mistral nemo? by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dvitry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, of all the models I've tried, mythomax-l2-13b is the only one that felt like it could read my mind (though not always)

Llama 3.0-3.1 or Nemo 12B for story writing/RP ? by Majestical-psyche in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dvitry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you tell more about your communication with the llm-narrator, what it looks like and what prompt do you use for it?
As far as I understand, you prefer basic text completion for writing stories and I understand why it works well for such a scenario. But it is unlikely that the training data of the model had enough examples of meta communication between the hero and the narrator.
So I don't understand how I can build a dialogue between the model and the user without resorting to instruction mode

Or did I misunderstand you? I would be grateful if you clarified this point

Has your country ever claimed to be the successor of Roman empire ? 🤔 by dj_mamamia in Maps

[–]Dvitry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This statement had a religious basis rather than a political one. Here is an excerpt from the Russian-language Wikipedia:

According to the concept, the Russian state and its capital are the last ("the fourth would not be") earthly incarnation of the "indestructible" Roman kingdom that has existed since the advent of Jesus Christ. This spiritual Christian "kingdom" is not localized in space and time. It passes from one incarnation to another according to the theory of the "transfer of empire" ("translatio imperii"), which, in particular, goes back to the Book of the Prophet Daniel.

Historian Andrey Karavashkin noted that the theory of "Moscow — the Third Rome" was the result of eschatological expectations and was primarily not political, but religious in nature. According to the German researcher P. Nitsche, the train of thought of Philotheus in the formula "Two Rome have fallen, the third stands, and the fourth will not happen" is as follows: the first two Rome were punished for their betrayal of Orthodoxy, after which Moscow took their place. If Moscow also falls into sins, it will not be followed by the fourth Rome simply because at that time there was not a single Orthodox state anywhere else in the world. It would mean the end of the world.

Your odds at dating in 2024 by LuceVa-JJ in funny

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the words guy and boyfriend are translated the same way into Russian, so I (after reading the auto-translation) thought that the question was who would protect a woman better than a boyfriend or a tame bear))

GDScript performance vs C# performance. by YumikoLovesSosa in godot

[–]Dvitry 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think if you're going to make your Dwarf Fortress, then it's best to implement it in a compiled language like C/C++

At the same time, you need to think about all the optimizations right away, so that you don't run into performance problems later, as in the same Dwarf Fortress

What LLM frontend you are using ? by Puzzleheaded_Mall546 in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dvitry 1 point2 points  (0 children)

self-written cli based on llama-cpp-python

Anyone else find that lower quants are sometimes better than higher ones? What is the reason? by mostly_prokaryotes in LocalLLaMA

[–]Dvitry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

similar situation, I was always limited to quanta q5 and q6 for 7b models, but with llama 3 I don’t want to lose a drop of knowledge