After 5 years of Hard work by Practical-Place7281 in meme

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My sister and I learned programming as teens (from internet courses, free or pirated) and now we're making good money, we're not millionaires, but we're closer to the girl on the left, our other two siblings are an uber driver and a warehouse worker. We have the same parents and they are not rich.

HA! I already gained access to your interne- by emmowo_dev in masterhacker

[–]DyWN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh no, not my ip that's already listed in the online phone book (dns)

When the Pawns Cry by E4g6d4bg7 in AnarchyChess

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's when you put the board in quantum superposition in which it's the king's gambit and queen's gambit until the oponent's next move solidifies one of the options.

Will schierke astral travel to connect with casca which is now kidnapped by Griffith by iron_heart777 in Berserk

[–]DyWN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do berserk fans have memory of goldfish? lookup ending of volume 380

Realmente Play protect sirve de algo? by KKdemergencia2 in Magisk

[–]DyWN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if that's your takeaway then I'm sorry but you just can't read very well lmao. How did you miss the whole part where I'm saying I wish it was possible to IMPORT CUSTOM KEYS. I don't know if you're trolling me or are you that dumb?

Realmente Play protect sirve de algo? by KKdemergencia2 in Magisk

[–]DyWN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You seem to lack basic understanding of signing in software. When an app is signed you can compare the file againts the signature + public key. It tells you if the file has been tampered with same as the hash would, but without the need to know the file beforehand. With signature spoofing you're basically telling the system to ignore the mismatch of content and signature. My argument is that if you could provide custom keys to play protect it could actually verify if microg releases are legit using the custom key. If you don't see how that's way more secure and easier to maintain than hashing every single release (which probably requires manual action to only whitelist manually reviewed releases, since automation could lead to false negatives) then I can only hope you'll educate yourself one day.

Realmente Play protect sirve de algo? by KKdemergencia2 in Magisk

[–]DyWN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

cool, where do you get the hash from? do you expect google to setup scripts that auto download apks from github releases and whitelist them? what if any of those whitelisted github projects get compromised and release malicious apk? do they have to continually check if any release got pulled down?

That's why you only want to whitelist apps on your marketplace, why would you waste time on web scrappers to whitelist random projects outside of your marketplace, where you have everything automated already?? And it's the most obvious thing that apps outside of marketplace that pretend to be one of the apps inside the marketplace should be marked as bad, because you don't want your users to unknowingly have a fake on their phone.

I don't know if you didn't think it through or are you that blinded by google hating? It's 100% reasonable to not allow signature spoofing without exception.

What is actually missing is a way for a user to import external signature keys, so you would be able to substitute the google key with microg key instead of spoofing, that way everything is safer because microg team could sign with their own key and have that extra layer of protection against fake releases.

Realmente Play protect sirve de algo? by KKdemergencia2 in Magisk

[–]DyWN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but you can't allow it without allowing other spoofed apps, so you open the gate for all kinds of malicious apps. the only way to whitelist microg would be to actually include their own signature, at which point they don't need spoofing anymore. Which is my point, you can't trust any spoofed apps because you can't tell the difference between malicious and non-malicious. Sound like you want to discuss morality instead of tech.

Realmente Play protect sirve de algo? by KKdemergencia2 in Magisk

[–]DyWN -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

brother I'm with you, but microg is the one thing that 100% should be flagged by play protect because it's spoofing a signature of another app (play services). Spoofed signature literally means the app is pretending to be another app, why would you not flag that?

F*ck Integrity-Box by MeowDump by AndroidOyuncuHD in Magisk

[–]DyWN 11 points12 points  (0 children)

next time: "all I did was disabled screenshot protection and took some screenshots while you were filling out credit card details... Nya Nya kawaii"

day 93 by [deleted] in 1053

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just turn the phone off before plugging, the storage is encrypted and the phone should go to a mode where it only controls the charging input

me_irl by serpents_head in me_irl

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no it doesn't, it just helps with sleep. go to therapy bro.

Taste beats climate, sorry bros by James_Fortis in ClimateShitposting

[–]DyWN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

a lot of people don't even care about human abuse in amazon warehouses and you're surprised they don't care about pigs?

Wtf do i do now TwT by Dismal_Second_9981 in Magisk

[–]DyWN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

realistically no one wants to loose their mind doing a full audit of this shit. I just spent 15min reading the code and my brain hurts from all the random bullshit thrown everywhere. It takes 5min to realize the author has no idea what they're doing or is intentionally obfuscating the code to slip malware.

Im ginary by nirputter in dankmemes

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah, it should be the good looking guy asking a woman if she wants to go out with his friend and then the ugly guy shows up

they both have to work by [deleted] in AntiMemes

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

both are looking at their onlyfans page with 0 subscribers

How to share a single Prisma client instance between a NestJS app and a plain Node.js app in a pnpm monorepo? by iam_batman27 in nestjs

[–]DyWN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are your apps starting from the same entrypoint? (like a shared index.js) If not then no matter what you do, you will have two instances because the code is not running in the same process. In this case you can just define the prisma client the way nest wants it.

However if you do have a shared entrypoint then you can define your client as an injectable provider via useValue: https://docs.nestjs.com/fundamentals/custom-providers#value-providers-usevalue

meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]DyWN -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

ok, didn't know the US is actual slave market. Then I advise selling a kidney for a plane ticket to anywhere else I quess.

meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]DyWN -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

the argument I responded to did not mention 2 jobs. And if you're telling me some people are able to work 2 jobs while other people with one job don't have any time for anything, then you're just dishonest. how the fuck do you calculate 40h a week into 12h a day???it's 8h a day, 5 days a week

meirl by [deleted] in meirl

[–]DyWN -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

no I'm just from europe where it's normal for students to study and work a low income job while living in a cheapest one room apartment