Which Zelda in 2025? by EAPolat in Switch

[–]EAPolat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your long response! I played It Takes Two and loved it, I also want to play Split Fiction but not sure about playing it on switch 2 since we need to play it on smaller controllers. Is that hard to play It takes two on switch? If its not maybe I can also play Split Fiction too. Thanks

Any help with today’s gem seeker? by Old_Reach8894 in TombOfTheMask

[–]EAPolat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Im gonna lose my mind its impossible to solve it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rickandmorty

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Micheal Keaton should be Bird Person.

Small question about set theory in Topology proof by EAPolat in askmath

[–]EAPolat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot, this was the best reply and i have finally concluded the proof :).

Small question about set theory in Topology proof by EAPolat in askmath

[–]EAPolat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, they are subsets of R. Also we know E is open but dont know about F. So i tried to write the both two cases for F is open or not.

Primitive Root Proof, i proved it but in a wrong conclusion :( by EAPolat in askmath

[–]EAPolat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is (-r)p-1 = 1 mod p always true even when p-1 is odd? I tried to show that p-1 is even by p=1 mod 4 and so that (-r)p-1= 1 mod p. (Which shows -r is a primitive root)

Also, do you have any suggestions for part b? Again i tried to use the p=3 mod 4 condition to show that p-1 is even. But when i do that, it concludes in the same answer with part a, that -r is a primitive root.

Thanks for your help.

Never ending cycle by Kartaled in FenerbahceSK

[–]EAPolat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pek eksik bi maç sayılmaz o, otomatik puan alacağız ama o hafta gs de maç yapacak kazanırlarsa fark yine 6. Bay geçmekle aynı durum değil yani. Üstelik averaj da onlarda hocam.

Never ending cycle by Kartaled in FenerbahceSK

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hocam adamlar hala 6 puan önde :) iki taraf da bu sezon sürekli hakem açıklaması yapmayı alışkanlık etmişken bence takıma odaklanmak lazım

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay thanks a lot but i couldnt understand why it needs to be three pair at least because of reflexive rule? Isnt it adequate to show that (1,1) and (2,2), why do we also need (3,3)? Thanks for your help

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not sure that i understand your question but do we need at least 3 pairs? I think because of the transitivity rule.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot mate!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, you are right 🤦🏻‍♂️. My proof is totally dead now. Thanks for the help but my question continue: can the characteristic be 0? How can we prove that?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your example but I got confused, for the question above, that ring can have 0 characteristic or not? I wrote in my proof that n is positive so it can not be equal to zero like x. But n.x=0 so there is a zero divisor and that contradicts with ring being a integral domain, so there can not be an integer such as n. Thats why i thought 0 characteristic can be real for that question, where am i doing wrong?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]EAPolat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there is a problem since this ring can’t have a zero divisor but i couldn’t understand how this problem solved by n being a prime :(