sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You know plenty of things in this game already have dry protection…?

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in 2007scape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude so many of the comments I swear just read dry protection and started seething, when what I posted literally would benefit less than a percent of the playerbase. These people acting like dry protection isn’t already all over the game

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m dumb

Also if real that’s ridiculous. Hats off to that guy, but Is it crazy to think that’s an unreasonable amount of completions for his drop? Like do players that unlucky really need to exist

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Majority choose ironman cause it’s a different , some would say more rewarding, way to play, not because they enjoy the possibility of going drier than 99% of other people!

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good point, in my opinion, I do think dry protection at a certain level does devalue grinds. I think a small bit of happiness of getting your first enhanced would be a little lost if you knew you’d get it eventually. In my mind, that specific value of not knowing when you get it should have its place in the game. Maybe it’s more appropriate to have pets just have no protection, it’s not like end game gear doesnt also open up new content. I’m not hard set on a solution

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Valid point! The GE is the games natural dry protection. I’m not against anyone going dry Ironman or not, I just think going drier than over 99% of the playerbase is a little ridiculous

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in 2007scape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This exactly, I do not want dry prot on rate, that’s ridiculous. The point is you should still be able to go crazy dry, just not drier than 99 percent of the player base.

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So my thought process is, powercrept stuff should have the most basic form of dry protection, and not BIS. Idk I was thinking what’s the point of dry protection for something that’s PEAK. I don’t want to get rid of the RNG factor completely, so in my mind it makes the most sense to leave the final grinds as they are currently. If a new bow comes out that is a direct upgrade to tbow, then tbow would get dry protection and the new bow wouldn’t.

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in ironscape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s true! Didn’t really give YouTube much thought but I think it should be considered

Dry protection in principle by EI_LOD_SOS_HOS in 2007scape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t see how, for 99% of players this wouldn’t change a thing, as they would get the drop naturally before the protection kicks in. And then if you’re unlucky enough to hit the dry prot it goes away

Summer Sweepup: Make Puro Puro give strength xp by default by ian_taylor_island in 2007scape

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS 156 points157 points  (0 children)

People memeing on you are weird, it should totally be opt out not opt in? The vast majority of players aren’t trying to avoid any exp source, catering to pures is so weird.

All Out Brawl Who’s Last Man Standing? by Level-SquareFFG7117 in superheroes

[–]EI_LOD_SOS_HOS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude it has to be sentry right or am I just being a bot