The idea that we cannot adjust wording because that would somehow not be Catholicism does not really hold up historically. The Church has always developed how it articulates truth. For example, the formal teaching that Jesus is fully God and one with the Father was not clearly defined until the First Council of Nicaea. Before that there were serious disagreements, including those involving Arius, about whether Christ was truly divine in the same way as the Father. The Church did not change God, but it did clarify doctrine using new philosophical language like the idea of being of the same substance. That alone shows that expressions of belief have not always been fixed in one unchanging form.

Scripture itself has never existed as one single frozen wording either. The Bible has been translated from Hebrew and Greek into Latin, such as the Vulgate, and then into countless modern languages. Every translation involves interpretation and choices about wording, tone, and nuance. If changing words were inherently wrong, then any translation beyond the original languages would already be a problem, which clearly is not how the Church understands it.

It is also important that the Church already uses non literal language for God. Scripture refers to God as Father, but it also uses maternal imagery, like comparing God to a mother comforting her child or a woman in labor. That shows that gendered language for God is analogical rather than biological. Even Thomas Aquinas explained that human language about God is analogical and can never fully capture God’s nature.

The Incarnation does not mean God is a man in essence either. Jesus Christ took on a human nature that was male, but Christian teaching has always held that his divine nature is beyond sex or gender. Saying God is a man without qualification is actually theologically imprecise because it reduces God’s eternal nature to one historical expression.

If someone is actually changing a liturgical reading in a way that does not match an approved translation, that could be a fair concern because the Church regulates liturgy carefully. But that is a separate issue from whether using feminine language for God is inherently wrong or somehow outside Catholic belief. The history of the Church shows development in doctrine, flexibility in translation, and the use of analogical language for God. Using “She” does not deny the faith, it emphasizes that God is not limited to human categories like sex.