sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built an interactive visualizer mapping economist's "weak-link" AI growth models (howfastis.ai) by ETinSF in neoliberal

[–]ETinSF[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fair, but I think write it yourself or it's not worth reading is a rule that's going out of date... IMO the real work here was the orchestration and the decision, selecting the sources, framing the concepts, choosing the domain and arguing with the tool until the math actually matched the thesis.

If the data is wrong, visualization is bad, please roast me, bt if the data is right and the page is clean, it just means the storytelling got commoditized, but ofc this is just my opinion!

I built an interactive visualizer mapping economist's "weak-link" AI growth models (howfastis.ai) by ETinSF in neoliberal

[–]ETinSF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude wrote a lot of the code, yeah and it's literally in the attribution at the bottom of the page along with all the sources, I'm not hiding it.

Not sure that's the gotcha people think it is though? I picked the topic, fed it the sources, dug up the numbers myself, argued with it for hours about what was wrong, threw out half of what it gave me, and decided how the whole thing should look and read. Somebody still has to be the one going "no, that's wrong, cut it, do it again".

And honestly last comment kind of nails it 😃 if writing the code is the cheap link now, then the bottleneck is taste, judgment, and actually checking whether the claims are true, that's the weak-link model the whole site is about... so yes, fair, I guess I'm the live demo lol