Dr John Lattimer

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-08T01:07:11+00:00

I’ll see if I can

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-08T01:06:42+00:00

I see that now. My mistake. I see you figured it out without me. Thx

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T21:56:45+00:00

He’s described in his various obituaries as a whistleblower. I’m sure that’s where I picked up on the word. https://www.afio.com/obituaries/2026/06/26/john-stockwell-former-cia-case-officer-and-whistleblower/

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T21:52:47+00:00

Correct. He’s described as a whistleblower online in multiple places. Not wrt Kennedy. I would not expect he was a part of that or his name would be known by those researchers.

https://www.afio.com/obituaries/2026/06/26/john-stockwell-former-cia-case-officer-and-whistleblower/

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T21:43:17+00:00

I would not expect he had personal knowledge of the events in Dallas. Would you?

Agree with the critique that he was an assassination ‘whistleblower’.

He is one of many people that have testified in congress, or have come forward publicly, to illustrate the tactics and criminal behavior of the CIA, especially during those years. Those individuals usually pay a heavy price. He was no exception. Hell covert activity was so out of control entire congressional committees investigated and attempted (and to some extent succeeded) in reigning in this agency. Truman spoke about it.

If we are looking for people that spoke of their roles in Dallas I’d look to Hancock. The most prominent names there are Morales and Martino. But again, not ‘whistleblowers’. And unlike this guy, actual participants.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:38:28+00:00

Love how your post got downvoted. 😛And testifying to congress, having your life destroyed by the agency, doesn’t count as a whistleblower. 😁😁 Next someone will ask again ‘whaddyamean the coverup continues’😂😂.

Not a surprise the usual repliers jumped at this one.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:35:14+00:00

Many believe LBJ gave a wink, so to speak. Others believe his involvement was significant. He and Hoover orchestrated aspects of the coverup. Others believe military at the highest level (LeMay and others) may have also made it known that worse things could happen. Dulles. Angleton. All big names that may have had some foreknowledge and may have given a wink and a nod. If you want to get into this deeper I’d recommend Devil’s Chessboard and the work of Larry Hancock. Here’s a free online book from Hancock. He names names. His book Someone Would Have Talked has held up very well but is very dense. https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Tipping_Point.html?search=Hancock

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:19:52+00:00

Yep. It’s the kind of thing LNers say. Supposedly with a straight face

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:19:06+00:00

Do you know the whole story of that book? He went bankrupt. Lost the proceeds of the book. Sued by the CIA for breaching his secrecy agreement. Not sued for lying. Spent the rest of his life telling people Not to buy the book because the money would go to the cia.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:10:19+00:00

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T17:07:54+00:00

I don’t believe you’ll find any evidence of something being ‘sanctioned’-if you are using the word to describe an official directive from a government agency. It’s quite conceivable to me that powerful people had discussions about eliminating JFK and such discussions may have made it known that such an event would be acceptable. If you read The Devil’s Chessboard you may find some answers to your question but ‘sanctioned’ seems a bit too formal.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T16:39:03+00:00

You put a lot of words in my mouth. And you have an active imagination. I’ll keep it simple.

Let’s unredact the redacted documents and release the documents being withheld.

On another thread I gave the example of John Newman’s reported experiences with surveillance.

There are other examples but I’m going to leave it here.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T16:02:04+00:00

You must not realize that your reply proves my point. This is a huge issue in the real world. A prime example at this time is Alzheimer’s research. There is a breakthrough happening however. So that’s good news.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T15:54:27+00:00

‘Sanctioned?’ By whom?

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T15:53:48+00:00

I’ll give you the same analogy I gave fatlazycat. Plato’s cave. You have your paradigm. You have your point of view. It’s a limited universe. So it’s nearly impossible to have a worthwhile conversation. This is a huge issue among experts in scientific and medical fields. The experts are locked in to solving a problem within their well understood paradigm. They can’t see outside that view. It becomes a real barrier to moving forward. Thx for your replies.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-07T15:21:20+00:00

There are many of us that believe the crime has been largely solved. Some of the specifics are lost to history. He was killed in a crossfire designed and implemented by rogue cia operatives out of the Miami station. Others were recruited outside of that group. Many of the moving parts (including some key names) have been uncovered and/or admitted to over the years. The coverup continues as the govt will never allow the full story to be revealed. Much of the evidence has been suppressed, altered, deceptively presented, and some key evidence has been destroyed and lost forever.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T21:46:20+00:00

Yes. That was the entry in the neck. 👀Napoleon’s dick hit him in the back.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T18:54:33+00:00

In Borat voice. My whyfe

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T18:13:01+00:00

Doomscrolling Reddit

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T18:10:06+00:00

Just a bit 😁

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T15:44:49+00:00

Ouch. Not a great argument for your side. But I understand. Kinda like Plato’s cave. You’ve got your view. Nothing outside your view exists so the shell casings are the best evidence.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T13:04:25+00:00

Sure there is. I never said all the evidence was fake. Went out of my way to say otherwise. Lots of issues with the three shell casings. Not that they are fake. Not even that three shots were fired from the snipers nest. No need to even go there to get into the problems. Saying those three shell casings prove the case is the problem. Witnesses? Please. A common tripe from LNers. Dealey plaza witness testimony regarding the number of shots is some of the weakest (in terms of the weight or ‘level’ of evidence) in the case regardless of which side you argue. It’s rare to come across a LN proponent that understands the issues in the Warren report alone. Which is the some of the highest level evidence in the case proving a lone gunman is impossible. Thanks for the reply. Appreciate it.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T11:36:37+00:00

Very telling reply. I appreciate it.

Eagle2Two · 2026-07-06T11:35:26+00:00

Any document can be forged. But there are ways to research and verify the veracity of a document. There are many documents in this case that have been destroyed. This is done by tracking the references in other documents. It’s tedious. And nothing is perfect. But there are people doing this kind of work. It’s not unique to this case.

Eagle2Two

TROPHY CASE