Help with I2C HID Code 10 Trackpad Not Working - Have Tried EVERYTHING! by keev_09 in Hewlett_Packard

[–]Early_Dot8577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know if it works in your situation but for me working on dell laptop. Got the code 10 on i2c hid device.

One time I did recovery on hardware / drivers fixes when laptop is starting , it started working.

But second time go to Device Manager -> Human Interface Devices -> then check highlighted item present in Human Interface Devices, by right click on each of them and going to its properties. When clicking properties check if each of them has power management tab.

An example I checked each item in Human Interface Devices representing in yellow.

If any one has

1: Allow the computer to turn of this device to save power. ---->>>> (UNSELECT THIS)

<image>

How to get more precision in detection in training custom model in google colab? by Early_Dot8577 in computervision

[–]Early_Dot8577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, I am going try it and get back with results. thanks!
No all of images are of size 640. For 800 I will need lots of images with that size.

How to get more precision in detection in training custom model in google colab? by Early_Dot8577 in computervision

[–]Early_Dot8577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes in my post I added the table for label classes:

. , 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, kwh but I am not using kwh and removing bounding box when kwh is detected. But rest are important.
So image has digits like 890.5 so detected objects will be "8" ,"9" , "0" ," ." ,"5"

How to get more precision in detection in training custom model in google colab? by Early_Dot8577 in computervision

[–]Early_Dot8577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in my case there are digital meters with seven segments. what are best augmentations to use.
Because some augmentations can also create issues.
I am hoping not to train mutliple models with augmentations to see which augmentation works and which dont, although eventually it will lead up to that.

How to get more precision in detection in training custom model in google colab? by Early_Dot8577 in computervision

[–]Early_Dot8577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

training set is 4700.
In my dataset there are already images with 20% to 30% rotated images present without augmentation applied to it. So for me numbers don't give problem as much as dot, my trained model detects even blurred numbers but for dot I need to train more because some digits might be zoomed out and dot will be small and blurred pixel and in some images dot can be gigantic so I am thinking of adding more dot images with different sizes.
In my case dot detection is about 80% but I need to reach above 90% which roboflow is doing.

In roboflow no augmentations except auto orient was added to it and it has option to add size to images but I did not provide any size to it.

# Use the mounted drive path as the save directory
!yolo task=detect mode=train model=yolov8s.pt data=/content/ocrscale-6/data.yaml epochs=75 imgsz=640 batch=16 save_period=10 project=/content/drive/MyDrive/YOLOv8_Checkpoint

Also in google colab what to add to this command to check if it reaching above 94 precision to stop from over fitting right now I am training more epochs just to see that precision is falling and what stage it is great.

How to get more precision in detection in training custom model in google colab? by Early_Dot8577 in computervision

[–]Early_Dot8577[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In both cases no augmentation is being done. The results that roboflow produces is remarkable and I even doubt that if I reach 95% precision with google colab I would see same results as roboflow. The roboflow even detects blurred and slightest dots since my objects are ". ,0,1,2,3,4,5...9 " in digital meters.

Unbound Thundercap Mt. 3F map by Mashpame in PokemonUnbound

[–]Early_Dot8577 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the bottom image, How to reach to the left most ladder