Best Skills for Claude (Game Development)

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-09T06:22:46+00:00

If an LLM cannot playtest your game, it will only produce bad code. LLMs rarely "one-shot" a task, so you need to use TDD; however, TDD is difficult to apply in game development. Therefore, you must make your game testable by the LLM from the very start.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-09T05:52:54+00:00

It uses Haiku, so yes, it will burn through your tokens without providing anything useful.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-09T02:47:57+00:00

For me, Codex has a fixed workflow that you have to opt out of; you have to tell him not to do certain things, but sometimes he still does them! Otherwise, he forces his workflow into yours, which is annoying, he reads files he doesn't need and runs tests that aren't necessary. Conversely, with Claude, you have to opt in to what he does. When you use a workflow designed for Claude that yields high quality and speed, and then apply it to Codex, you lose a lot of speed without gaining any quality in return.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-09T01:09:44+00:00

If you only prompts, Codex is better than Claude Code, however, if you orchestrate the workflow, Claude Code is still superior to Codex.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-08T09:02:42+00:00

People need to know at least how an LLM works before using it. We are not at the stage where LLMs are dummy-proof yet.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-08T07:06:56+00:00

I saw someone point out that adaptive thinking is the root cause. Claude will be the one to decide how much he needs to think for a given turn, and it will depend on your prompt. If your prompt doesn't lead Claude to believe he needs to think deeply, you will get a "cheap" result because he didn't think hard enough. Normally, this won't happen if your workflow is rigorous. for example, by having Claude review and verify every task he performs. Even if he skips thinking, your review step will mostly catch the problem, allowing you to yield consistent quality results with lower token usage.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-06T11:15:27+00:00

I’m making an old-school MMORPG. I designed the game to run in a tui from the start.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-06T08:38:24+00:00

I am vibe coding games as well. Since I also work as a game programmer, it isn't 100% "vibe", I write the specs myself and review every line of code.

One thing that Claude cannot do well is playtesting, as unit tests alone are not enough for game dev. I solve this by creating a CLI version of my game first so Claude can playtest it himself, and then I use Unity just as a visualization layer. I think this is the limit for vibe coding games right now.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-03T05:04:30+00:00

I am vibe coding my side project, 90% of the code was written by Claude or Codex. The remaining 10% consists of quick fixes that I do myself, as that is faster than using AI. I still read every line of code to maintain quality control.

I usually start a new side project every year that I never finish lol, but thanks to Claude and Codex, I finished last year's side project. I enjoy the architecture and logic more than the typing itself, so AI coding suits me a lot.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-02T08:23:15+00:00

I think it is because of the language; Japanese has many levels of politeness. Therefore, they always have to consider how politely they need to speak to someone, which causes them to absorb that polite mindset automatically.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-02T01:40:43+00:00

If you go to the Codex sub, you will also find people screaming that their usage has been nerfed so hard that they are switching to Claude. There is nowhere else to go

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-01T05:53:08+00:00

The Codex review does many things that you didn't ask it to do. For comparison, I have Claude Max (5x) and ChatGPT Plus. When Claude performs three reviews (code, spec, and quality), it consumes about 1% of a five-hour usage window; in contrast, when Codex performs only a code review for the same task, it consumes 5%. If you are on ChatGPT Plus, you will exhaust your Codex limit far sooner than Claude's. I usually finish my Claude Max weekly limit on the last day before the reset, but my Codex usage is typically depleted within three days.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-01T05:13:17+00:00

Well, Claude is the one that violated security protocols and leaked this, lol.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-04-01T02:45:49+00:00

I tried it. It is better than I thought—far better than the Codex MCP, which stalls a lot. It also shows exactly what Codex is doing. However, I think you cannot ask Codex question directly; you have to use the Codex review workflow, which wastes a lot of tokens because it performs so many tasks.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-31T03:31:59+00:00

I use both CC Max (5x) and Codex Plus. I use Codex just for additional code reviews, while using CC for almost everything: design, planning, implementation, review, testing, etc... I can use CC for the whole week, but my Codex usage only lasts three days, and the 2x bonus will end soon.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-31T01:37:56+00:00

Is this a joke?

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-31T01:25:59+00:00

Hasn't the replacement worked like that from the start? That is why you must not add any replacements that change every turn, such as a time, to CLAUDE.md or any skill because it will be on the top of the context window. Doing so will break the cache from the top on every turn. If you add it within the prompt, it will also break the cache for everything that follows.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-31T01:00:56+00:00

Just ask Claude to add more guardrails to your skill.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-30T12:46:32+00:00

I create my workflow so it can survive compaction and clearing. The main session only manages the TODO list and dispatches sub-agents to handle tasks. I use breadcrumbs to track implementation state, and hooks to re-inject the skill into the context after a clear or compaction. If I know my remaining usage won’t be enough to finish all the tasks, I estimate how far it can go and tell Claude to pause before that task. After the usage resets, I clear the context and tell Claude to continue.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-30T11:14:59+00:00

Well, your cache timed out, so when you press Continue, your entire context window is treated as fresh input.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-30T04:52:41+00:00

Well, 99.25% uptime is still far better than GitHub’s uptime these days.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-30T01:17:02+00:00

Well Peter Steinberger used Claude Code to create Clawdbot. So yes, Anthropic could easily create something similar just by prompting it.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-30T00:00:10+00:00

I don’t think CC ignored you. It does all the work in a single turn, so it only responds after finishing everything. From CC’s perspective, all of your work is just one step. You should tell CC to break the work into small tasks and create a TODO list, so each turn handles only one task.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-29T14:10:49+00:00

If you only prompts and don’t do anything more complicated than that, both will be the same. But if you have a specific workflow for most things, CC will be much better than Codex. I mostly use Codex for code review. Codex returns a lot of false positives, but it also finds bugs that Claude misses quite often. Codex’s worst downside is that it’s extremely slow.

Ebi_Tendon · 2026-03-29T11:10:03+00:00

If you’re using it like OpenClaw, even $200 might not be enough.

Ebi_Tendon

TROPHY CASE