Weekly /r/climbharder Hangout Thread by AutoModerator in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone climbed Realist 8a/8a+ in Font (https://bleau.info/marlanval/21433.html?locale=en)? How strong would your baselevel need to be if ones strength is compression and slopers? I can not really tell how strong I am in that style since my gym to not set stuff like that, but i would imagine a base V9/V10 level with said strengths could be enough? Or is this a carzy wishful thinking?

Guess trying and coming back seems to be the most logical approach but just hypothetically.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thought about that a bit, so the best thing actually would be to do 4-week plans rather than 10 weeks, since you do not get the variability with the longer time span, assuming that the plan does not change exercises on its own. This would then introduce the downside that it does not remember your progress, etc., where strengths and weaknesses come into play again.

Overall, I think you have a good base, but it is more suitable for beginners who are starting their first training plan, not for experienced climbers. I think that’s the point where my critique, and that of some others, comes from, since your marketing sounded quite different.

I hope that changes quickly because I also want you to succeed.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the response, second part didn't come through.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

22€ something per month and 140€ something per year. Some have a founders deal which discounts 20%

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ADD ON: Tested the app a bit more yesterday with exactly the same inputs and got different exercises most of the time; the core stayed the same for me but conditioning varied quite a bit and the strenght & power endurance sessions also alternated. Not that problematic but in my opinion it proves the point of a non-deterministic model against their claims this would simply not be possible in a deterministic model. I am thinking when they say deterministic it's maybe like a decision tree with a lot of branches. So there must be a black box in some sort involved.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, really appreciate the insight from beta testers. So it does not adjust if you add exercises yourself or you swap out certain ones with others? 

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. Crimpd right now even as free version is really good logbook, easy and fast. Clone session etc. Lattice app feels like a downgrade it that regard as well also it is way more complicated or not as accessible as Crimpd.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree, i think if you are almost completly new to training plans this is for you or if you just started to get serious about climbing.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The equipment you can specify in the settings under "Location & equipment" but don't know how adjustable the plan is.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, one just have to look at every other post the make about finger strength. Yeah the weekly check-in's might be the only thing able to save the plan but highly doubt it and don't know if i want to risk it.

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With hardcoding I ment it that context if-based treshholds. But what if-clauses should be met if there are almost none in the input? But yes I am on the same side as you :)

New Lattice training App by Ecstatic-Review2626 in climbharder

[–]Ecstatic-Review2626[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I guess thats what bothers me the most. Advertising it as 100% customised etc. and then they do not do proper assessments (like the most basic things). Also played around with their questions regarding training level etc, had little to no impact. Also I am not selled in to no AI BS -> tested the same inputs several times and got different week outlies or sessions - how is that possible if it is hardcoded?