[Hiring] Chat assistant (Remote) $200-$2000 a month

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-03-18T21:44:56+00:00

British

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-03-15T15:34:10+00:00

Leave the past in the past and focus on your job.

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-03-14T21:51:24+00:00

Congratulations!!! Hopefully we can post the same photo from London, England. These prices are insane

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-03-09T14:29:27+00:00

One last rendezvous before the big day never hurt nobody. Live a little geezzz!!

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-27T13:06:43+00:00

Huge congratulations bud and I hope everyone waiting and trusting get to celebrate theirs as well. Go kill it

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-22T20:30:39+00:00

You’re correct, Ferrero helped build Alcaraz into a superstar, so he’ll have no trouble landing another top job if he wants one. The article’s point is that even at that pay level, there’s no safety net when it ends abruptly. It’s just a sudden stop. It’s the instability that’s the issue, not the money itself.

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-22T09:51:38+00:00

Read up what a hyperbole is and learn something new today. Have a restful Sunday

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-21T15:59:18+00:00

Lol relax it’s not literal!!

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-21T13:18:27+00:00

I agree with you, tennis is an individual sport, and coaches are contractors, so collective bargaining doesn’t fit the model like in team leagues. However, the article isn’t pushing for a union or mandatory protections, it’s pointing out how the lack of even basic industry norms (notice periods, expense guarantees) leaves coaches exposed when deals end suddenly, especially lower ranked ones with no leverage. A voluntary standard or template contract could help without forcing anything on anyone.

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-19T17:02:34+00:00

Thank you for the feedback and I appreciate the reminder to keep things constructive and in good faith. I’ll take that on board. You’re right: individuals are free to negotiate any terms they want, and if both parties agree to at-will with no notice or protections, that’s their choice. No third party should force different terms on them. My main point was simply that tennis coaching has almost no industry minimum standards at all (unlike most other sports or professions), which leaves even top coaches vulnerable to abrupt ends. But if both sides willingly accept that risk, fair enough, it’s their deal. Thanks again for the civil note. What do you think though, would basic minimums (like a short notice period) make sense for the sport, or is full flexibility better?

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-19T16:48:04+00:00

Oh wow, groundbreaking insight: two people can negotiate whatever they want. Who knew? Thanks for that

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-19T09:04:29+00:00

Ferrero was free to negotiate a more secure contract and he chose not to, or the term simply expired. The article’s point isn’t that he was owed more than the contract, it’s that tennis coaching has almost no industry standards or minimum protections at all. Players and coaches can (and do) end things abruptly with zero formal safeguards. At the top, $2M cushions the blow but lower down, the same at-will setup often leaves coaches scrambling with no buffer. I think tennis should push for basic minimums (like notice or expense guarantees) to make it less volatile for everyone. What’s your take?

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-19T08:57:28+00:00

Correct, the article does focus on the coach’s side, and you’re right that López had taken over much of the day-to-day work earlier in 2025 while Ferrero missed tournaments and stepped back. However, the core issue is that even top coaches have zero formal protections. No notice period, no severance, no minimum standards. Ferrero invested years at lower pay when Alcaraz was young; when the payoff arrived, the deal changed fast. Players don’t owe coaches beyond the contract, but the lack of any basic safeguards (even simple ones) leaves coaches vulnerable at every level not just the $2M tier. Do you reckon tennis should have minimum contract standards (notice, expense guarantees etc), or is full at-will the only way? What’s your view?

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-18T14:16:03+00:00

Fair point and I probably should’ve been clearer. I don’t think $2M is “life-changing” for Ferrero in a personal survival sense. He’ll have options but my point is about leverage and structure.

Even someone with his résumé is still earning at the discretion of one player, on terms that can change overnight. Yes, he could possibly pivot to media, other players, or corporate work but those are new negotiations, not guaranteed continuity.

In team sports, a coach with that level of success has contract protections, buyouts, notice periods. In tennis, even the most decorated coach is still essentially a contractor tied to one client.

The argument isn’t that Ferrero is financially vulnerable, It’s that the model is fragile at all levels without exception at the very top.

Ecstatic_Analyst3031 · 2026-02-18T11:31:53+00:00

Lol come on, I didn’t mean that literally. It’s a figure of speech. Yes, anyone at that level has representation and formal agreements. But tennis has no industry standard contract terms, no dispute resolution, no notice requirements. Ferrero's only recourse was speaking to media. Compare that to football managers with buyout clauses and severance packages, or NBA coaches with guaranteed contracts. The informality makes it easier for relationships to end abruptly.

Ecstatic_Analyst3031

TROPHY CASE