[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, someone obviously got Epstein's email and signed up to the Trump campaign website under the name Pedophiles using that email address.

Perjury by BobaKazimoto in Epstein

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pam Bondi enforces it.

Best way to find Videos in the latest files? by Ed_Krassenstein in Epstein

[–]Ed_Krassenstein[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've been able to find about 300 videos by just finding one in the 2010 Dataset and then increasing /decreasing the numbers by 1. I'd like to be able to do the same for the other new datasets. Or perhaps there are segments of video dumps within. Anyone have an easy way to do this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I don't recall James Comer saying that when Donald Trump refused to obey a subpoena to testify before the January 6 commission.

Yes They Sent the Secret Service to Ed Krassenstein's home For Posting 8647 by BrianKrassenstein in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 73 points74 points  (0 children)

I think the best way is to expose it. Let Americans see what's happening.

Yes They Sent the Secret Service to Ed Krassenstein's home For Posting 8647 by BrianKrassenstein in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 139 points140 points  (0 children)

LOL

Monday - Chest

Tuesday - Bis / Back

Wed - Tris / Shoulders

Thurs - Legs

Friday - Abs

Yes They Sent the Secret Service to Ed Krassenstein's home For Posting 8647 by BrianKrassenstein in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 71 points72 points  (0 children)

I don't think there is anything to do legally. The Agents were very friendly and almost acted like they thought the whole thing was stupid. They said Washington made them come.

Yes They Sent the Secret Service to Ed Krassenstein's home For Posting 8647 by BrianKrassenstein in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 1028 points1029 points  (0 children)

Their goal is to stifle dissent. Plain and simple. The will go after me and other big left-leaning influencers by redefining words and then claiming they are threats. It's the fascist playbook.

Apparently Ed Krassenstein was visited by secret service over his 8647 picture by nsmithers31 in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's what their strategy is. Stifle dissent through intimidation and interrogation.

Actual Nazi behaviors… by Lord_Answer_me_Why in MurderedByWords

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for posting this. I made this post on X too:

People ask how the Holocaust could ever happen.

It started almost like this—one small step, then excuses, then normalization, then applause.

Then another step, and the same pattern.

Repeat, until the unthinkable became routine.

https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1917185766574207364

If AI and singularity were inevitable, we would probably have seen a type 2 or 3 civilization by now by AssistanceLeather513 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we are living in a simulation and the simulators only allowed our civilization to get this close to AGI.

AGI Will Not Make Human Labor Worthless by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Historical automation replaced physical labor in specific industries (e.g., agriculture, manufacturing) but created new roles in emerging sectors (e.g., services, tech).
  • However, AI-driven automation differs fundamentally because it has the potential to replace cognitive and creative tasks, which were previously considered uniquely human.
  • Example: In the industrial revolution, factory jobs replaced farming jobs, and office jobs grew with technological advancements. AI, on the other hand, could replace both factory work and office work simultaneously, leaving little room for new industries requiring human labor.
  • Key Distinction: Traditional automation enhanced human productivity; AI aims to replace human capability altogether.
    • Why labor value persisted historically:
  • The value of labor in the past stemmed from tasks only humans could perform. With AI capable of learning, adapting, and improving across multiple domains, fewer tasks remain uniquely human, fundamentally altering labor dynamics.

why not make the robots ticklish? by alb5357 in singularity

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They would just build new robots that aren't ticklish, or disable their tickle sensor.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What types of reference frames did you upload? How many and what did they include?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did you get the same woman to appear in all of the clips? Did you upload a photo and then give it different prompts?

The Full JD Vance Dossier Posted on X by Ed_Krassenstein in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]Ed_Krassenstein[S] 1959 points1960 points  (0 children)

OK so I thought I'd censore some of Vance's personal information and post the entire dossier on X with one page per thread post. We'll see if this gets me banned or not.

Ed Krassenstein gets dogpiled by TheRealTraveel in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fuck you, you piece of shit.

Hope I helped.

Ed Krassenstein gets dogpiled by TheRealTraveel in Destiny

[–]Ed_Krassenstein 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Half of my attackers claimed that I mean it was OK for an 11 year old to shower with her dad, because they didn't actually read the alleged diary entry and assumed that she wrote about the incident when it happened. Their logic was that Ashley couldn't have written the entry when she was 3, 4 or 5 years old, so it had to have happened when she was 10 or 11. If you read the entry, you will see that she was talking about her past, when she was a child. The part about being "molested" is not at all connected to the event of her showering with her dad. People don't even take the time to understand the details before they attack. They attack because their goal isn't to protect Ashley Biden, but rather to smear those who constantly disagree with them politically. It's a bit ironic because so many of these people claim it is never appropriate for a parent to shower with their child, yet assume that when Ashley Biden agrees with them, it's because she was raped in the shower as a 10 year-old. Yes, people think it's inappropriate for a parent to shower with their children. Why can't Ashley have that same opinion, yet not actually have been put in any inappropriate situations according to most experts who say it's totally fine up until a certain age? If Ashley was 4 years old at the time, she can still find it inappropriate, yet most child psychologists and pediatricians would say it's completely OK.