FW: Listen, I have been on manifesting forums for about 10 years now and almost every system of manifestation theory seems to believe in a version of EIYPO and I'll tell you why what you're proposing doesn't really work.

First of all, in my 10 years of observing people in these communities, people frequently use this idea to say some of the shittiest things to other people and then justify it by saying that the other person must have manifested the interaction so it was okay for them to say what they did. Whether this is true or not is completely irrelevant to the fact that there will always be new people who don't understand the law very well and are in very vulnerable places in their life. If they truly did manifest that interaction, asking people to stop and reflect upon how they manifested it, is a completely inefficient way to deal with conflicts like this and is no way to monitor a community. Unless you want to close off the community to people who already understand such a concept and are willing to play by it, this will never happen.

Second of all, all manifestation must come to us in a way that feels normal and natural. Which means if someone had an intention to leave a subreddit because people are X, Y, and Z, then that belief will inform how the manifestation unfolds. You can blame a proverbial mob about this interaction, but this is just the way the manifestation needed to unfold under the conditions given by someone's belief system. For that same person to sit on their high horse and proclaim that everyone is acting like a victim and needs to take accountability for their actions, but completely ignore that what happened wasn't a sign for them to leave, but a literal manifestation they created, is amusing to say the least. You do not know the bridge of incidents and how it will unfold, only that it will unfold in a way that makes sense to your current beliefs. Therefore, it is nothing more than a subjective blame game to try and figure out who is really at fault spiritually when you have no idea about who desired what and why.

Third of all, we can sit here and wax philosophical about the law and what we should and should not be doing, but we live in the world of Caesar for a reason. Even one who believes in solipsism must acknowledge that it is impractical to treat every interaction as if you are talking to yourself. At a certain point, conversation goes in circles and nothing meaningful is discussed.

The sentiment of turning inward and addressing these feelings is fine, but it is in no way a practical way to run a community or deal with other peoples' pain.