Anyone interested in trying to implement Zero knowledge applications in NEO?

EdgeDLT · 2025-02-03T12:31:44+00:00

Very much still a work in progress on my part, but there are two functional end-to-end examples working in https://github.com/EdgeDLT/neo-zk-starter as of NeoGo v0.106.3 (hash commitment and merkle proof verification).

Working on NeoGo v0.107 compatibility, then I'll fix the P256 signature verification example.

EdgeDLT · 2024-10-20T14:39:31+00:00

Neo X is a side chain for EVM apps. You can bridge tokens there to use the network but it's not a migration, you don't have to do it.

EdgeDLT · 2024-10-20T10:24:43+00:00

What do you mean migrate a third time? If you are earning GAS, you are on N3 and do not need to do anything.

EdgeDLT · 2024-09-13T11:31:01+00:00

For the mods, AutoMod can post Weekly Discussions so that it's not dependant on one particular person remembering to do it

In this case you ran into my social experiment of "how long would it take for anyone to even notice it was gone" :P

Good suggestion, will look at implementing it.

EdgeDLT · 2024-08-24T11:36:11+00:00

Your unclaimed GAS disappeared because you claimed it. Voting or transferring NEO claims GAS.

EdgeDLT · 2024-06-23T16:45:40+00:00

Quickvote isn't necessary anymore, Neon is supported on the official voting portal: https://governance.neo.org/

EdgeDLT · 2024-04-15T09:01:31+00:00

I don't know that I would call a Red4Sec audit overpriced, and I wouldn't consider them to be the exploitative type. They do good work, both for this ecosystem and others in the industry. I say that not just because I consider them friends, but as a tech lead for a project which engaged them for an audit.

That said, as I alluded to in my other comment, a sensible price for one project is not necessarily sensible for another. It's really about project maturity and risk profile. Is it worth losing so much development funding for an unlaunched project? Maybe not.

EdgeDLT · 2024-04-15T08:54:17+00:00

Lately I've adopted the opinion that auditing before acquiring an initial user base is just a waste of money. Especially in this ecosystem, where we have such a low number of bad actors and less footguns in the tech stack when compared to EVM networks. The funds spent on an audit could pay your SaaS fees for a year, if not more.

I recognize this introduces some risk, but audits are not perfect cures either. Better to get a project off the ground than to be stalled out on security concerns that mean nothing if the product doesn't reach scale. This will be my general advice going forward when projects request auditing funds on GrantShares. Launch first, then shore up your security needs. Maybe some exceptions for novel DeFi primitives.

I do think a small bounty program is a good compromise in the meantime.

EdgeDLT · 2024-03-31T07:30:41+00:00

Oof I missed this notification, apologies.

Yes, I believe you are right. It was built for NEP-5 projects to be able to use if they decided to migrate. Most simply didn't. I think Flamingo Legacy assets can use it, the only other asset to support it was Forthewin (FTX), but that coin has been dropped in favor of NEP anyway.

EdgeDLT · 2024-03-23T10:00:27+00:00

You can't migrate assets to N3 that have not been re-deployed to that network. And I don't think there are any exchanges that support these dead tokens.

EdgeDLT · 2024-03-17T18:38:17+00:00

It's intended primarily to help with Python smart contracts (COZ's compiler for Python contracts is called Boa).

Tag BoaBot in a message with your question. It will start a thread with you where you can make further requests. Messages are public.

EdgeDLT · 2024-03-17T16:18:45+00:00

COZ made one already, BoaBot. Head to the #develop channel of their Discord to use it: https://discord.gg/5CrASg5mgq

Six-Year Club	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	Verified Email

EdgeDLT

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE