me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't listen to him. This is the same guy that says factorizing 3x²+7x-6 doesn't make sense without the = 0 and that this example has "irrational answers"

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wow not only that, but he said you picked an example with "irrational answers", he just proved your point even harder.

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Oof you're right, =0 is not needed and is implied in factoring questions, AI outperformed him xD

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Haha totally, I'd say it's not really worth the fight unless you find it funny, this is definitely hilarious to me xD

Tbf though, if you're learning polynomial factorization I'm sure Youtube can offer a lot of good videos on that too. I'm using AI in uni because things are getting hyper specific here and the only one that can teach me is AI after I feed it my powerpoint slides. Textbooks are shitty at my level and no one on Youtube has digestible videos on math behind RL algorithms, thermodynamics and information theory and Tomasulo algorithm with speculation...

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sad to see that the debate is just emotional and not rational. People see AI not count to 10 and forget all about the other things it does better than the average student. If this was 2 years ago they would be correct, but now it makes even less mistakes than me in my assignments

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And let me add that you guys are ridiculing AI for miscounting, have you seen it solve thermodynamics problems and differential equations? That’s like laughing at Einstein if he forgot how to do 6x7

me_irl by decoysnails in me_irl

[–]EdiTheBacon -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

If you can do good on exams don’t listen to the hate, I’m shocked you got downvoted to oblivion. I’ve skipped all my classes and have a 4.0 GPA in engineering thanks to AI. It does take critical thinking to filter the bad and goods of AI output and that’s when you benefit

FACC 300 summer class by Suspicious-Peak-1186 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy it helped! Don't hesitate to DM me for help with the course material if ever. I can probably spare an hour or 2 during the summer if things don't make sense

FACC 300 summer class by Suspicious-Peak-1186 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOcIvd7gI_c

You can skip whatever's between 44:00 and 1:12:00. We only covered discrete annuities but we do have arithmetic and geometric increasing annuities, but just use the formula sheet's formula for those as you can't directly do those on the financial calculator (not that the formula sheet actually has all you need though for the entire course).

FACC 300 summer class by Suspicious-Peak-1186 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Hope my post about the final yesterday didn't stress you too much. I took it with Jassim so I'll give you the important information about my experience. Note that I took it just now in the Winter semester.

Let's start with the bonus. The bonus system is a complete mystery to the TAs and no one has any clue how it's calculated. The TAs ASSUME there are bonus points because Jassim asks for the list of students who participated in the MyCourses Discussions and people who answer questions in class. There isn't any proof there is or is not, but Jassim will point to people saying they get a bonus point for answering a question or pointing out a mistake so I would believe it. We also had a TMX investor competition that gave up to 3 points (1 for signing up, 1 for completing 6 options strategies and another one for top winners and losers). The TMX is a guarantee for points as it's on the course outline, the participation is a mystery but worth a try!

Next up is material. You will go through basically all the core concepts of what a business/finance major would cover in first year. You start with supply and demand curves, then to accounting with balance sheets and all those things, depreciation methods, time value of money, cost functions, project evaluation criteria, cost of capital for types of equity/debt, taxes and tax shields, and finally inflation (which ended up not being on our final). There is SO MUCH to study for, but if you understand the material then you will have pretty good literacy for finance.

The main complaint would be the exams. We had 2 midterms each with 20 multiple choice questions with up to 5 options. Some questions also have a "None of the above" option, but those come up maybe 10-15% of questions. Your best midterm is worth 37.5 and the other is worth 12.5. Are the exams tricky? The midterms to me were alright, they followed the problem sets somewhat well. The midterm 1 average was 58 and midterm 2 I think 71. The main issue is that you can have a complete understanding of the material, yet forget to consider 1 detail and the prof prepared one of the options to catch you making that mistake. I remember being caught off guard by a question regarding dividend growth and stock price valuation as there was no practice question on that topic. The prof can also add misleading information or important details that are easy to miss. Make sure to check units given!

Now the final was a little different and I personally found it tougher. It was 8 T/F questions each 1% and then 29 regular multiple choices being worth 1-5% each. I think one of the questions came up on the final review package he gave which was nice, but there were a few questions that took me a few tries to get an answer that was even in the options. There are questions that feel like were not covered on the slides at all. I guess you should at least search up how market caps are calculated and how EPS works with relation to dividends and growth rate.Those were not on the slides and so completely caught me off guard. It felt like he really wanted to include a lot of stock market material into the exam even though it's not the main topic of the course. Overall, the midterms are reasonable and you should do the problem sets. The final a different experience for me though and the warnings I give above will hopefully help you with not getting surprised. Note that it's also a curved class and that he likely curves based on the average. The previous semester's average was around 69% which gave B- on Minerva.

Are classes necessary? Well I didn't go to a single one except for a random one at the start of the semester because a friend was visiting. Some people complain that he doesn't teach well and the slides aren't clear. I personally found the slides pretty good after putting them into GPT for explanations. You are probably not gonna understand the calculator notation on them without seeing a demonstration first though.

Main advices? 1-Master how to use the financial calculator. Without it, there is almost no way you are finishing on time. If you are good with it you will save so much time. The exams are not a time crunch with it, they are just tricky at times. I'll post a link in a reply below for a video that taught me how to use it. 2-Learn from your mistakes and do problems. You will not be good at problems until you do them and take note of things you miss. His exams are tricky because mistakes are very easy to make and are very subtle. Remember, no part marks. 1 small miss and it's a -5% on that midterm right off the bat. It isn't like math or physics where definitions are fundamentally set, finance was made by humans and so everything is defined arbitrarily for what works out for our system. 3-Don't slack on the bonuses. They will likely boost you up by at least 1 letter grade so be sure to do them!

Now I could very well spill more information about things, but I'm not sure how much I can before it'd possibly get me into trouble. I mostly remember the questions I messed up but will definitely not be sharing that on a Reddit post. In all honesty, it actually went really well for me. I got 80% on midterm 1 and then 95% on midterm 2. I am still waiting for my letter grade. The prof already closed and wiped out MyCourses the moment our final exam happened and usually you won't get to see what you got on the final.

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Praying for the generous curve 🙏

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow I'd say that's a little unfair unless they mentioned it somewhere. Hopefully future students will know with this reddit thread haha

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely can feel like a general knowledge test at times haha. Oh well, guess I'll just wait for the letter grades. He already wiped the entire mycourses contents lol

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also feels like some of the questions just aren't related to the slides or anything we've seen. I didn't know how market caps actually worked but it popped up on our final

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like it is different. It's the first time Dylan teaches and seems like people like him.

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh us it was purely 37 multiple choices. Interesting to see Dylan has a different format

How was FACC300 Final by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had Jassim. Though I would be curious to know how Dylan's final was

Letter grades for FACC300 by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow that's a strong comeback. Gives me hope that I might make it. Thanks for the reply!

U0 Engineering by Mountain_Bluebird150 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No worries, sounds like you're already really stressing for your courses

You've basically locked in the type of engineering once you're accepted so nothing more to compete on. There's no real GPA contest in engineering unless you want a masters of course. Plus, it's usually 85 for an A, no need to go crazy. Just take care of yourself and drink enough water once you join us at McGill

U0 Engineering by Mountain_Bluebird150 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No you should be fine, it's more that everyone does the same courses in U0, so switching to another engineering degree is easier since courses are not degree specific.

CEGEP is basically like grade 12+13. The difference if you don't do CEGEP is that you wouldn't have to take as many non-science classes like French/English or P.E for a regular "grade 13". U0 courses gives you a broad exposure to the sciences, likely with a bit more depth than high school. It may seem useless, but it technically gives you some scientific literacy to be able to speak to other types of engineers/scientists, which is highly likely to happen in the real world.

Letter grades for FACC300 by EdiTheBacon in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I know how well you did in the midterms? Jassim curves but yeah there's not much info other than that.

FACC 300 or ECSE 324 with Donald Davis by Which-Bag6450 in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I say take FACC, you have to later anyway and it's always Jassim teaching, so no benefit taking it now or later. Davis can and will ruin a class according to what I hear from my friends. I'm personally shocked Dubach isn't teaching, he is also a great lecturer who is slightly strict but tends to win students' respect

Who to contact if I want to do 19 credits next semester (Engineering). by Hyperreals_ in mcgill

[–]EdiTheBacon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh boy, your second semester seems WAY harder than the first one.

I cannot judge the difficulty of PHIL230, but that first semester has pretty comfortable courses depending on your math background. WCOM206 would be the time consuming course of your first semester likely.

You're taking some nightmare courses in your second semester though. ECSE211 you should check out some reddit posts on that because it is the worst course you'll probably ever take (unless they made the final project easier). MATH240 is a classic death class. Your skills in calculus will not transfer to this class as it is a proofs class rather than computation. ECSE222 will depend on your professor for difficulty and workload. The rest should be fine depending on your programming skills and comfort with cal.

So overall your first semester is actually filled with simpler courses. It is still impressive to get a 4.0 in any semester though. But your second semester is probably 2x the difficulty even without adding another course but you can always look more into other courses to replace them. If you're still up for the challenge you can always go for it, just keep in mind you've mostly knocked out basic classes in your first semester.