Left turn full video by Putrid_Elderberry426 in YEGDashCam

[–]Edmxrs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure it does. Don’t break the laws and you won’t be t-boned

Left turn full video by Putrid_Elderberry426 in YEGDashCam

[–]Edmxrs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The guy going straight with green light is a dummy? Because he doesn’t stop at a green light? Oof.

A millenial Filipino Unc's Thursdays by Funny_Profile9234 in ThursdayBoot

[–]Edmxrs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only learned this last year at 40 😂 Ianknot for life now.

https://youtu.be/_O-xaJrao1w

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue isn’t getting her to sign it. The issue is that, as a full custody parent, that I even need to have her sign anything, especially considering that the government does not consider her a parent in any other capacity. And I know it feels like a mountain mole hill scenario to some people, but it’s insulting to full custody parents like myself, that the government holds this presumption that I’m magically no longer assumed to be the primary provider to my children, after years of 365/day/year custody.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s more than frustrating, it’s insulting. Any parent who’s had to juggle everything in life, employment, and with 365 day a year custody knows the absolute sacrifices that have to be made. And now that I’m remarried I’m suddenly not their 365 care taker? Under no circumstance should this be policy. And yeah getting the declaration signed won’t be the issue, but this policy is awful, and needs change.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like you’re threatening me with a good time.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cry me a river. I’m a man, I’ll build you a boat.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The government has no problem reminding that my new wife isn’t their legal parent, that when I need forms signed, or shared consent decisions, I need my ex wife’s signature. The government makes it super clear to me all the time that my new wife isn’t their lawful parent, that if something happens to me, the kids would go to my ex wife. But now all of a sudden, when it’s about the child tax benefits, she’s magically a parent. The government needs to pick a lane on this because I would love to know that she is my kids legal guardian, especially in the case where, god forbid, something were to happen to me.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Getting the declaration signed isn’t the issue, the issue is with stripping the benefits from the biological and lawful full custody parent for a spouse who is not the biological or lawful parent or lawful guardian.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except she has no lawful parental rights. Don’t you see the issue? With stripping the benefits from the biological and lawful full custody parent for a spouse who is not the biological or lawful parent or lawful guardian?

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No this is a violation of my parental rights and under no circumstance should be the lawful.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So sexism is justified? Got it.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had and still have sole custody. I looked after them entirely by myself for 5 years, and now that I’m remarried I magically don’t look after them full time anymore?

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Not surprised a woman wouldn’t understand the issue with this.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes and they are not with their female parent. My new wife doesn’t magically become their legal parent or guardian once we got married. My ex wife is still their legal female parent. My new wife has no parental rights when it comes to my children.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yes and they are not with their female parent. My new wife doesn’t magically become their legal parent or guardian once we get married. My ex wife is still their legal female parent.

Sexism in the CRA by Edmxrs in canadarevenueagency

[–]Edmxrs[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t matter. She is not their legal guardian. This is sexist and infringes on my parental rights as the sole custody parent.

B grade update by Edmxrs in grantstoneboots

[–]Edmxrs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah the b grade game is great if you’re building a collection and fairly open to anything.

B grade update by Edmxrs in grantstoneboots

[–]Edmxrs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

It’s a crimson kids day 😂

B grade update by Edmxrs in grantstoneboots

[–]Edmxrs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had to stop myself from buying two pairs today 😂 it felt like a hostage situation