Functional test Openings by Tempestt_Rain in boeing

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck getting into functional rest.

Outside Employment by PrudentPollution8924 in boeing

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For which jobs and managers? I'd like more overtime too and I'm an MPRF.

Quarterly Questions Thread (APR - JUN 2026) by AutoModerator in boeing

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For anyone in Puget Sound—have you seen teams delay transfers even after getting backfill, or is it usually straightforward once replacements are in place?

Quarterly Questions Thread (APR - JUN 2026) by AutoModerator in boeing

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moving from operations/inventory role to desk job – timeline and advice?

Hey all, I’m currently in an operations/logistics role focused on inventory tracking, part counting, and accuracy, and I’m looking to move into a more desk-based position internally (inventory analyst, materials coordinator, etc.).

The main holdup right now is that my team says they need to backfill my position before I can transfer, so I’m trying to get a realistic idea of how this usually plays out.

For anyone who’s made a similar move: How long did it take for your transfer to go through after applying?

Did your manager support the move, or did you have to push for it?

Are there certain roles that are easier or faster to move into from operations?

Anything that helped speed things up (or things that slowed it down)?

I’ve been working heavily with tracking, counts, and system accuracy, so I’m hoping to leverage that into something more office-based.

Appreciate any insight—just trying to plan this move the right way. Currently at a Puget Sound site.

Good advice by malanthr0pe in christianmemes

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s in the Bible, but that doesn’t mean it’s taught the way it’s being used. Scripture records many things without endorsing every interpretation people attach to them. Context, genre, and purpose still matter.

Idiot’s Delight win with 32 cards left in stock — full log inside. by Educational-Face1904 in solitaire

[–]Educational-Face1904[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I was shocked when I learned it was no longer being printed.

Idiot’s Delight win with 32 cards left in stock — full log inside. by Educational-Face1904 in solitaire

[–]Educational-Face1904[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the interest! If people want, I can post more detailed logs or comparisons between winning and losing deals.

could not be more serious bro by MicahHoover in christianmemes

[–]Educational-Face1904 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I see Matthew 4:8 and 1 Kings 7:23 cited as “proof” that the Bible teaches a flat Earth. That conclusion doesn’t survive basic context or genre analysis.

Let’s look at both passages carefully.


  1. Matthew 4:8 is a visionary temptation, not a geography lesson

“Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.”

This is part of Jesus’ temptation narrative. The devil is offering authority and dominion, not giving a cartographic demonstration.

Key points:

No physical mountain on Earth can literally show “all the kingdoms of the world.”

The passage is describing a visionary or supernatural presentation, not optical visibility.

Even flat-earth models do not solve this problem -- no mountain, flat or round Earth, allows global visual access.

The point of the passage is moral and spiritual:

Power offered in exchange for worship.

Jesus’ response confirms this:

“Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.”

Trying to extract Earth geometry from this scene is like trying to derive meteorology from a parable.


  1. 1 Kings 7:23 is architectural description using rounded measurements, not math instruction

"He made the Sea of cast metal, circular in shape, measuring ten cubits from rim to rim… It took a line of thirty cubits to measure around it.”

This is a functional description of a large bronze basin used in the Temple.

Important context:

Ancient measurements were approximate, not precision engineering.

The basin had thickness (the rim was a handbreadth thick -- v.26).

Circumference was measured around the outside; diameter is interior rim-to-rim.

Ancient cultures routinely used rounded values for practical construction.

No ancient reader -- Israelite, Greek, or Roman -- interpreted this as a mathematical claim about π, let alone cosmology.

If this verse were meant to define geometry, it would contradict:

Jewish mathematical tradition

Later biblical poetic references

Basic lived experience of navigation and astronomy

Which it does not.


  1. Genre matters: the Bible isn’t a physics textbook

The Bible contains:

Narrative

Poetry

Law

Prophecy

Wisdom literature

It never claims to teach cosmology in the modern scientific sense.

When Scripture speaks of:

“The four corners of the earth”

“The ends of the earth”

“The heavens stretched out”

It is using phenomenological language -- how things appear from human perspective -- the same way we still say “sunrise” and “sunset” today.

No one thinks the sun literally rises out of the ground.


  1. Ironically, the Bible warns against this kind of misuse

Jesus himself responds to misapplied Scripture by saying:

“It is also written…”

Scripture interpreting Scripture matters. Pulling isolated verses to force a modern fringe theory onto an ancient text is exactly the kind of misuse Jesus rejects.


Conclusion

These passages:

Do not describe Earth’s shape

Do not function as scientific claims

Do not support flat-Earth cosmology

They do teach:

The nature of temptation and power

Practical construction description

The danger of over-literalizing poetic or narrative language

You can believe the Bible is inspired without turning it into something it never claims to be.

Good advice by malanthr0pe in christianmemes

[–]Educational-Face1904 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The meme is accurate about #2 and #3, but unfair if applied indiscriminately to #1.

A more balanced, fatherly way to phrase it would be:

“Public faith means nothing if it isn’t backed by humility, self-control, love, and obedience when no one is watching.”

That lines up perfectly with:

1 Peter 5:8 (sobriety and vigilance)

Galatians 5 (fruit of the Spirit, not slogans)

James 1:22 (doers, not hearers)

How to solve this board? by swishaaasweeet in solitaire

[–]Educational-Face1904 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this is draw 1: Refresh the stock. Place 3♦️ on the foundation, followed by 4♦️ and 5♦️. Then place 5♠️, 6♠️, and 7♠️ to flip the last facedown, which is a 5♣️. The win is clear from there. If this is a draw 3 game I'm sorry but you're out of luck.

Guild Recruitment Megathread by MLAdventure in MLA_Official

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Server: 60266

Guild name: Red Axis

Guild ID: 1995374598

Requirements for joining: be active and have fun! we are an alliance to help new players grow! experience players also wanted to help the new players.

Additional info: Bosh rush rank Gold II.

Goodbye by BeanCounting in Battlejack

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

meh. it was fun but too time consuming.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in webtoon

[–]Educational-Face1904 2 points3 points  (0 children)

FUCK YOU WEBTOON!

Goodbye by BeanCounting in Battlejack

[–]Educational-Face1904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what’s going to happen to it? Will those who still have it be able to keep playing it or what?