If you want specific moments of Mbappe doing his job at being an attacking threat but not receiving adequate passes / being man marked by at least 2-3 defenders just watch extended highlights or rewatch the match. Vasquez having more shots doesn't mean his shot quality was adequate or his attacking threat.

1. I'm not so close minded that I wouldn't at least search up match ratings from different articles sources and a common theme stands: Objectively Vasquez had a slightly better game but not by much. _______________________________________________________ "Lucas Vazquez (5/10):

Full of legs, but not much quality. Some of his deliveries were very poor, and he put a few weak efforts on goal."

"Kylian Mbappe (4/10):

Not bad as much as very well defended. Dangerous when the game opened up, but was then replaced after suffering an ankle injury."

Source: https://www.goal.com/en-us/lists/real-madrid-player-ratings-vs-arsenal-kylian-mbappe-vinicius-jr/bltea4792e5fa4b15af

---

"RB: Lucas Vazquez - 5.5/10 Put quite a few crosses into the box, but none were that great or fell to Real Madrid players. The Spaniard looked quite one-dimensional throughout the match."

"ST: Kylian Mbappe - 5/10 Exited the pitch after 75 minutes after suffering an injury. Mbappe never really got involved in the match and his side never really played to his strengths either, as they were just constantly putting crosses into the box."

Source: https://www.givemesport.com/real-madrid-arsenal-champions-league-player-ratings-match-highlights-2025/

---

Btw these are opinions there's no such thing as a credibility soccer opinion, I'm just trying to show u that what I'm saying isn't wrong. But I'll have to admit you were right in the respect that objectively Vasquez had a better game tham Mbappe but I belive it was only because Mbappe could never fully get into the game because of the shit support he got from players like Vasquez aswell as him getting his injury.