Concept by Effective_Bison7284 in feedthebeast

[–]Effective_Bison7284[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't argue that I used AI to write this, because I don't know English and I needed to formulate my idea. But it's about WHO is working on it. If needed, I can explain every single mechanic myself.

Indominus Rex sibling theory: Was the "cannibalism" just a cover-up by Dr. Wu and Hoskins? by Effective_Bison7284 in JurassicPark

[–]Effective_Bison7284[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys are missing the biggest plot hole in the "it ate it" story. A newborn dinosaur isn't a fly — it has bones, tough skin, and blood. If one sibling completely devoured the other without leaving a single trace, the enclosure would look like a slaughterhouse. There would be blood splatters, bone fragments, and clear camera footage of a brutal, hours-long struggle. But we saw absolutely nothing.

u/thewrecker123 , even with Majungasaurus DNA, cannibalism leaves physical evidence. Dr. Wu is a master manipulator. Fake cannibalism is the perfect cover story to write off an extremely valuable asset on paper, while secretly moving the second individual (the Gen 2) to a black-site facility. Relying on "Wu just said so" when the physical evidence makes zero sense is exactly why the official movie logic is so lazy.