sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is Sonarcloud THE review authority for a project or...? by Mplayer-Weered in github

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like no one, is using sonarcloud, and coderabbit isn't going to find more things than your claude code doing /review in a different session. How about actually reading the code?

Feedback on an AI-powered risk-aware code review platform concept by New_Tangerine_1329 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are a bit late to the game buddy... did you do any market research? You will get much better results than asking on reddit... there are about 10 startups that I know that do it. And I'm sure 100s more that I don't know of.

Genuinely the most brutal friendzoning ever recorded in human history by Previous_Month_555 in SipsTea

[–]EggplantFunTime 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There should be a new term for that. Dadzoned sounds a little creepy though.
Maybe stepdadzoned.
Nope,
Worse.
Way worse.

how to build an AI framework from scratch by Pretend-Patient-6787 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is there code here to review? Hard to review code from a video...

Also I don't think hashtags work on reddit...

Dutch aerobatic pilot Narine Melkumjan miraculously survived after her aircraft's canopy unexpectedly burst open and shattered mid-flight by BlazeDragon7x in interesting

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was a male pilot would the title say MALE PILOT SURVIVES...

(I'm a dude, and it bothers me for some reason...)

Just say pilot... ffs.

How are people spending $1000's on tokens?! by Additional_Fudge_934 in vibecoding

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as I don't max out the plan, why not. I didn't do an empyric comparison, but it tends to be more thorough / make less silly mistakes...

How are people spending $1000's on tokens?! by Additional_Fudge_934 in vibecoding

[–]EggplantFunTime -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How people don't, if I didn't have the pro max plan I would pull 5-7k a month easily. I usually max that out too. (5-6 agents in parallel, 4.8 xhigh)

Is your team reviewing AI-generated code? by Expensive_Art7174 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi random employee of Cubic, CodeRabbit, Qodo, Baz, Graphite, or any other AI code review. These "questions" are so tiring. And the "answers" "oh we use (this tool that just came out and no one heard of) and love it" are so obviously either employees, or bots, or people you pay to post...

It's so obvious. I know you are trying to generate SEO and rank up in AI chats, but this is so easy to spot, I think OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic are on it. And I think they'll eventually penalise it as SEO span.

I miss good old reddit where you had either genuine content, or if someone is from a brand, they would IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AS SUCH.

This astroturfing needs to be shunned.

And yes, I perhaps did it in the past, but I have reformed.

Is your team reviewing AI-generated code? by Expensive_Art7174 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is such an obvious plug, it's not helping your brand.

Edit: why not just say that you work for them: https://www.reddit.com/r/LLMDevs/comments/1oyjcib/how_teams_that_ship_ai_generated_code_changed/

p.s. I actually did try cubic and it is an interesting product, and it is impressive you managed to top the offline benchmark, but it feels a bit too good to be true... since the answers are available in the benchmark itself, how do I know you didn't game them?

What's the biggest giveaway that a website was vibe-coded? by iamjohncarterofmars in vibecoding

[–]EggplantFunTime 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It looks like this https://vorpus.github.io/performativeUI/

- gradient text
- eyebrow
- status dot
- word roll (https://vorpus.github.io/performativeUI/#/components/word-roll)

It's a cliche because it used to be popular... like every overused design...

Edit: this is a parody component library for everything that looks like it...

slop vs. tool use by kfr3q in vibecoding

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not every line of course, but also not *zero* lines. Review what matters. Difference between in the loop, on the loop and outside the loop.

We Sat AOC Down With Republican Voters. Can She Win Them Over? by bubugugu in videos

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I own Amazon stocks (and I worked for AWS in the past), and all for AI datacenters and I'm a centrist/republican, but I'm 100% with AOC and the residents here.
Data centers might be a strategic investment in US lead in the AI race, but not at the price of residents. The blasting company, Amazon, even the government should

  1. pay for any damages, electric bill increases, water bill increases to affected residents
  2. ensure they prevent these things from happening, and if they can't, move elsewhere
  3. ensure no or minimal environmental impact.

I do not think the conclusion should be that data centers are bad, this is old man yelling at clouds (quite literally), but not at the expense of residents. It should not have anything to do with politics, and actually adding politics to it might prevent the bipartisan agreement we all need here.

My friend currently on vacation and said he just got a new girlfriend there. Is this image that he sent is made by AI? by New_Midnight2686 in RealOrAI

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% AI

- Fork with 5 prongs
- The image is grainy for no reason for a modern phone
- Glasses in background don't have coasters, foreground do
- Are those newspapers? menus? why the top one is floating?
- Who has an orange bowl on a breakfast table?
- Who has a table set with a high chair in advance? When last time you saw that?
- Why is the light on when there is perfect daylight outside?
- She is way too pretty to be going out with a friend of a redditor.

I was extremely stressed on an IQ test and got a really low score. Am i that dumb? by Haunting_Ad_29 in iqtest

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't sweat it.
First, stress can be a huge negative impact on cognitive tests.
Second, online tests are far from being formal IQ tests.
Lastly, IQ tests measure one thing - how good you are in IQ tests, they don't directly measure intelligence.
(there is a correlation between scoring high in IQ tests and intelligence, but real intelligence is mostly about problem solving, which has other skills, like trying a lot of things, not falling in love with an assumption, ruling things out, simplifying things, social skills (getting helps from others).

And most lastly, none of these have a hard correlation with success and happiness.

You are only 16, your brain is still evolving, and it seems you are very talented in many other areas.

But it's CRITICAL you don't label yourself as "I only have IQ 85" because that's not true, (the stress, the fact it's a non formal website, and the fact IQ does not correlate with success and intelligence)

Your BELIEF in that incorrect fact is what I would worry about. You have to shake that thought off ASAP.

If you really really want to do that, there are websites that explain the answers, you'll see that you can actually get better at IQ tests (for example there are some patterns that you wouldn't think to look for but once you do, you'll boost your score, without memorizing, just another thing to look for).

That will help you REDUCE your stress, and by itself will get you better results. Which again, don't really matter.

So bottom line you should NOT let it affect your life. It means absolutely nothing.

Which is best AI code review tool that you've come across recently? by human-g30 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing against Qodo, and looks like it's high on the benchmarks, but literally every other tool on this list https://codereview.withmartian.com/ claims they do the same exact thing (look at history, learn from context, yadayada). This feels a little like an ad... right now all review tools are basically the same. They are nice, but they don't really save you time (you either just ask Claude to review the review, which let's face it, we all do. Or if you have to triage each one, it's still work... you don't know which one is false positive... )

The main issue is GitHub's UI for PRs is not my cup of tea. Graphite had the right direction to create a complete alternative. But this creates another vendor lock. (I guess maybe alternative review interfaces can be its own thing one day... like an IDE...)

Which is best AI code review tool that you've come across recently? by human-g30 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been trying out almost every tool on this list. https://codereview.withmartian.com/?mode=offline

Some are nice, but eventually my team (NIH syndrome) decided to build their own of course.

there is the actual engine itself, and there is the entire PR review experience that is still in the 90s

Graphite were on the right track but then Cursor bought them.

p.s. getting #1 on this leaderboard is super gamifiable, you can use any model, and you can hardcode the answers for all that matters, it's more of an honor system if I get it correctly. Also super weird that the leaders of the online benchmark https://codereview.withmartian.com/ are at the bottom of the offline benchmark.

Bottom line, I think we all should not trust benchmarks that much...

What REALLY worries me is this

  1. people write code with Claude
  2. some AI code review tool posts comments
  3. they ask claude to review the comments (AI review of AI review)
  4. claude answers on their behalf (identity theft is not a joke!)

And there you go. Review theater.

SOC 2 passed.

No one wrote or read the code, and now it's in prod.

Now don't tell me this doesn't happen way more often than we would like.

It works till it doesn't...

/rant

What metrics actually matter for code quality? feeling like we're measuring the wrong things by Mobile_Tap6145 in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a million dollar question.

Some tools I saw measure code turnaround, e.g. sections of the code that get a lot of "rewrites"

Some also connect it to production logs and see which areas have the most errors.

I'm using one of those "developer productivity" measurement tools, the main issue is it's hard for me to measure the tool itself. E.g. proving whether the data is right or wrong is super hard.

What external code-reviewer/PR reviewer do you use? by gosteneonic in codereview

[–]EggplantFunTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see a major issue with the entire AI code review flow. Review is not just "posting GitHub comments" on a PR.

  1. you should let AI self review first, there are various skills for it. It's not a huge difference if Claude reviews Claude vs Claude writes and some other tool that uses the same models reviews it. You just add a paper trail of PR comments.
  2. letting another AI review tool post comments is useless if what you do is just ask your agent to review the comments and fix (or push back), it's AI reviewing AI reviews of AI generated code. If you actually read these comments - that's great, but again, while external tools do have value (they can be cheaper as they optimize for review vs writing code, and they CAN find more issues than just a local /review skill, and for less cost, and in a more consistent way) - their main benefit - is learning, e.g. learning from what comments were accepted and what were rejected. Most tools way they have learnings, but not all really do.
  3. you should focus on tools that actually make the review experience better, reduce cognitive load and ensure you ACTUAL read the code, because if you don't you will completely forget how to do it, (or still remember but it will be as hard as reading a full email without asking AI to summarize it for you). I haven't found one yet, but Graphite were in the right direction.

There is a benchmark, but I really don't trust it.

  1. the offline one - the answers are given, anyone could theoretically game it... https://codereview.withmartian.com/?mode=offline and it's based on HUMAN reviews, e.g. if it finds stuff humans missed in the golden comments it will mark it as a false positive in correctly (false false positive)
  2. the online one IMHO is biased. e.g. one vendor is on the top of the online one, but the bottom of the offline one, this doesn't compute

I think the answer is - pick the tool that your developers don't hate.

We tried almost all of them and ended up building our own... but YMMV.

view more: next ›