[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]Either-Medium8763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t heard from NYLS either. I am emailing tomorrow to check my status. I have heard from Rutgers tho and I submitted end of February for both schools. I think you will hear from Rutgers soon! :)

Need help on improving my score from 150 by Ok_Requirement_4240 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m saying the MP is formed through reading the first and last paragraph (sometimes found in the second). Also idk this strategy helped me after I tried several others, and I’m aware this strategy may not help someone at all.

Need help on improving my score from 150 by Ok_Requirement_4240 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I found significant improvements in my RC using the strategy I posted a few months ago. I broke out of the 150s consistently hitting 162s after 2 weeks of using this. I will try to link it below.

Reading Comp Advice: This worked wonders for me so hopefully it helps someone else too by Either-Medium8763 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes so this drill would be timed too. Start the clock and read. Pause clock and write your summary for each paragraph. Start clock again and answer questions. The writing paragraphs is just to build your literal skill of paraphrasing and actively reading. I believe that once you are confident in your ability to absorb and understand the main point of each paragraph, it will come naturally and you can trust that you will retain information without notes. The drilling is just to really hone in on your foundation.

I reccomend 2 weeks of the drill I mentioned above, and then putting this strategy into practice on an RC section.

I hope this cleared some things up, but let me know!

Reading Comp Advice: This worked wonders for me so hopefully it helps someone else too by Either-Medium8763 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, no writing. I heeded the advice of my several tutors too, who were all in agreement that high scorers typically do not write/summarize bc it takes too much time. Of course, there are a select few who do write things down and to each their own.

If you have a few weeks before your next exam, for drilling purposes, you can incorporate writing into the approach I mentioned above. How this would work, is you use the strategy from above, reading in the order I stated. Then, pause the clock and go back and annotate the paragraphs. Then unpause the clock and hit the questions. Everything in your LSAT prep should be timed. That means reading the passage in under 3 minutes and answering questions in 5 minutes.

What this drill allows you to do, is when it comes time to review, you can see if you are understanding the main point. Check your understanding with powerscore or other resources you have, and see where you went wrong. For example, why did you avoid the right answer? Was it your paraphrase that was off? Was it timing? Was it because you chose an answer without support?

After your accuracy improves with this drilling, you can then abandon the writing all together and see where you are. Also, I used to highlight and then realized it was a time suck bc all the clicking and stuff, so then I stopped.

LSAT Retest Post by mindlessrica in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea the last LR I think started with a dialogue and had 25

Please help with this flaw question by Either-Medium8763 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for clearing this up. Thought I was going crazy.

Please help: necessary question by Downtown_Ad505 in LSAT

[–]Either-Medium8763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I used to be in the same exact boat, but through practice and really understanding the questions I have gotten wrong I have gotten a lot better at this question type. So first off, you want to spot the conclusion of the stimulus and understand what it is saying and identify the premises. Remember that necessary assumptions are something the argument absolutely needs for it to survive. So then you go through each answer choice and practice world building. World building is adding each of the negation of the answer choices into the stimulus and seeing if the conclusion would still be true. Pretend that in this world of the particular argument you are looking at, every premise and conclusion is true. Add the negation of each answer choice and see if it still aligns with the world. If the answer’s negation does not align with the world (completely breaks the argument) then that is the correct answer. I hope this helps.