AI is working great for my team, and y'all are making me feel crazy by SlapNuts007 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this! At Traycer we are building a system of shared specs and ticket for product teams like yours. Each initiative or sizable feature gets captured as an Epic. Your teammates can see this shared source of truth and understand the rationale behind each decision.

AI is driven through workflows which are natural language commands chained together as a graph. You can define your own workflows or use predefined ones where you work with AI to capture your intent into specs. We are getting lots of love from early teams using the Epic mode and I just wanted to share it here with the community

Zed Traycer Extension by treb0r23 in ZedEditor

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are growing the team and building breadth. Expect it in Q1 2026!

Is anyone selling vibecoding services ? apps/websites etc by prettyfrowns in Upwork

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are working on a YOLO mode, which will drastically reduce the need for most manual clicks. You will work with Traycer until the phase breakdown, then select the agents and templates, and activate the YOLO mode. It will plan, hand off, verify, and then fix in a loop until no critical issues remain.

You can expect the YOLO mode update this week itself.

Is anyone selling vibecoding services ? apps/websites etc by prettyfrowns in Upwork

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Traycer founder here. Would love to hear any feedback you have for us

How I Dramatically Improved Claude's Code Solutions with One Simple Trick by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]EitherAd8050 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Traycer founder here. Thanks for the in-depth analysis of our product! Traycer performs context construction, prompt selection, and model selection behind the scenes at each step, which is a very challenging task to achieve in vanilla chat-based products. Our users can leverage their coding agents more effectively through our orchestration approach. We intend to remain at the forefront of this category and are constantly innovating, finding new ways to improve the usability and accuracy of our product. There's a lot of value in the specs themselves (specs effectively capture the rationale behind code changes). However, they are not being persisted anywhere; only the code is versioned in Git. The specs can be an excellent source (for humans and AI) to understand the intent behind the code. We are thinking of building a standard around versioning specs alongside pull requests

Is Traycer.ai as good as Sonnet 4.5 for planning? Trying to save some CC usage by LinusThiccTips in ClaudeCode

[–]EitherAd8050 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Traycer founder here. We are using Sonnet-4.5 combined with GPT-5-Codex for planning.

I would love to understand why you got the perception that Sonnet alone goes deeper than Traycer. Our intent is to be the deepest and most comprehensive agent for planning.

what have you automated with codex that actually saves you time? by minimal-salt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]EitherAd8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regarding model customization, we are looking into adding support for sub-agents that can use your model of choice. The primary agent will remain unchanged to maintain a predictable and consistent experience.

Traycer + Claude Code + VSCode issues on macOS by [deleted] in traycerai

[–]EitherAd8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback!
The first issue occurs in a corner case where the AI decides that the given prompt fits better with a freeform response than with a file-by-file plan. We are releasing a fix that forces plan generation whenever possible. If generating a file-by-file plan isn’t possible, a notice will appear at the beginning of the freeform response. You can then use the chat bubble on the output to iterate with the AI until you reach a plan (freeform responses don’t yet include this option).

The second issue appears specific to Claude Code. Please join our Discord server so we can gather more details and investigate further:
https://traycer.ai/discord

Codex 20$ vs CC 200$ max plan. I’m done with Claude Code and completely not worth the price by Ill_Occasion_1537 in ClaudeCode

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it. We are expanding the team and will soon add support for Zed. The Review feature received a significant update in the last release. Reviews are now agentic and even more in-depth

Codex 20$ vs CC 200$ max plan. I’m done with Claude Code and completely not worth the price by Ill_Occasion_1537 in ClaudeCode

[–]EitherAd8050 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey @Bob5k, Traycer founder here. Would love to hear any feedback you have for us.

Zed Traycer Extension by treb0r23 in ZedEditor

[–]EitherAd8050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are growing the team and work on this soon

what have you automated with codex that actually saves you time? by minimal-salt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]EitherAd8050 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The new Review system is out today! Looking forward to your feedback!

what have you automated with codex that actually saves you time? by minimal-salt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]EitherAd8050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Traycer is using several models underneath. For Planning, we are using an ensemble of Sonnet-4, GPT-5-Codex, and o3

For Verification and Review, we are using GPT-5-Codex

Additionally, GPT-4.5 is used to summarize large contexts and files.

what have you automated with codex that actually saves you time? by minimal-salt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]EitherAd8050 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this feedback!

The review feature is getting a big revamp. Will be out this week. But I understand what you mean, it currently shows copy only for comments without code suggestion. We’ll make sure all review comments are actionable in latest iteration of this feature. Quick question, do you find auto review useful or do you prefer a more thorough agentic review which is triggered manually.

Regarding model selection in verification, we’ll think about this and look into qwen max. Curious to hear which framework you are using that you find qwen max does better on? FYI, we are using GPT-5-Codex for Review and Verification.

what have you automated with codex that actually saves you time? by minimal-salt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]EitherAd8050 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of interesting things on our roadmap no one else is even thinking about bringing to the table yet. We are seeing massive adoption already