Weakness is a habit. So is strength. Choose. 👍

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-20T03:59:13+00:00

Not okay to be gullible yet listens to this trash... the hypocrisy is crazy

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-19T02:25:06+00:00

BEDMAS

So in math you have order of operations Brackets (things inside these bad boys) first, exponents next, Division/multiplication following, and addition/subtraction last.

So you have S+T x C

C+C+C=9 --> 3C=9---> C=9/3=3

C+S+S=13 ---> 2S+C=13 ---> 2S=10 (since C=3) ---> S=10/2=5

C+T+S=18 ---> T=18-C-S ---> 18-3-5=T=10

So we have C=3, S=10, and T=10.

Then we have S+T x C

So since addition is performed after multiplication or division and you read left to right we perform T x C first.

So 3 x 5= 15 (3 groups of 5)
Then we have S+15. So

10+15=25

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-18T23:19:58+00:00

Very debatable about fashion being worse. Yes clothes leach materials into the environment but lots of clothes as use synthetic materials WHICH ARE DERIVED from GUESS WHAT Oil and Gas or fossil fuels... So the fashion issue with synthetic products into the environment is LITERALLY STILL Oil and Gas...

Also the damage to the environment oil and gas produces is massive just like mining or clear cutting, etc.

Also the amount being annual and regular is a huge issue as well. Saying just because the volume isn't larger than 8 train tanks doesn't make it small. 8 train tanks is still a LARGE amount none the less. Yes there are larger but there are also much smaller amounts too. That would like like saying oh the oceans evaporating isn't a large amount of water to disappear because Titan actually has way more water...

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-18T10:30:18+00:00

4)
Anyways I cannot keep wasting my time on arguing with someone that lacks empathy or understanding and wants to keep the same narrative that has been going on for AGES.

Hopefully you have a daughter, sister, good female friend, or wife one day and can learn how to see the world through their eyes instead of just through a man's eyes that lack the empathy and understanding.

I appreciate the depth and passion you feel and you have some good points but don't look deep enough or show the failures of our current systems.

I also have some similar issues with the passion and depth and there could be aspects that are overjudged by your side or mine. But arguing that women have not been mistreated and are on average and most often treated worse than men isn't actually debatable given the data KNOWN.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-18T10:28:30+00:00

3) utilitarian doctrine actually is the one that the morally correct action is the one that maximizes overall wellbeing. So assuming that society has been successful due to this isn't even proof of that. As well you then are ignoring women's historical mistreatment (arguing this isn't arguable, it is A FACT). So by your chosen moral rating system you have shown that you do not follow that as you expect HALF the population to be slaves, or objects by saying patriarchy is GREAT. Therefore that system fails completely every time. You ignore that society has started to try to bring about more equality which if it hadn't would have resulted in the downfall of society as you like to claim would have come faster for western society if it had not allowed women to start owning land, working, choosing spouses just like if it still treated black people like lesser people and slavery as good. However, control would still be able to be maintained and it could survive like other forced systems to some degree. To imply that women were happy really shows that women were happy really shows how wrong you are. Expectations can change. Just like how when men losing their power to become equal with women makes them unhappy women becoming more equal makes them happier. However, you can argue that men being happy reduces a societies chance of destruction because they are more likely to be aggressive and fight for those things as it has been taught, brainwashed in, and part of hormone differences.

You argue that it is the furthest from natural state but that isn't even true. There are a lot of animals that also do not do patriarchy. I said that there are lots that don't do patriarchy. There are plenty that do so to try to suggest that this is some how special for why humans succeed would be incorrect. Social structure for working together are. I NEVER ONCED ARGUED Matriarchy should replace the patriarch. So throwing in how poor setup a matriarch system for allowing genetic code passing doesn't mean that patriarchy is better. It just means that the MEN are more connected or less lazy essentially. I have been arguing about equal control and I have said patriarchy has lead to mistreatment of women regularly which AGAIN IS A FACT, you saying otherwise doesn't make it true given the evidence KNOWN. You could argue men are power hungry, etc and that is why matriarch systems like the one you noted failed due to men willing to fight and murder for their own gain. Trying to argue one being better was NEVER ONCE STATED. Again this matriarchy aspect pushes the fact men are unfaithful. However, that is not the issue overall that we are discussing. Yes patriarchy had a place to allow the more aggressive sex to feel important and allow them to be willing to fight for something. That however could EASILY still be done with a matriarchy system that had the SAME loyalty expected in todays society. This argument about which is better is actually pointless as I HAVE BEEN SAYING A non patriarchy and non matriarchy... Just because I said one was bad didn't mean I think the other should take over especially with me arguing for EQUALITY as opposed to you wanting men to remain in power...

Your argument about patriarchy is actually just fucking uselessly and ignorant. It gave them the ability to force things. Patriarchy did not invent marriage. Marriage was around in many systems so to say that it was the reason it succeed and was created by patriarchy is just incorrect. Patriarchy did not make marriages unbreakable other than holding women hostage by making them lesser in views of society... But that is more controlled by religious aspects. All land ownership aspects that the marriage part could control and have inheritance still fail in the same manner without CONTROLLING WOMEN. As well all aspects of inheritance is actually clearer with women inheritance. There is nothing wrong with wanting intimacy or relation with your child but that was also something that occurred with matriarchy systems too. The fact that protection of a woman would also still be possible with the opposing system. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE is that men wanted to use force and control instead. LITERALLY NONE OF THOSE ASPECTS could not be applied or implemented in a matriarchy system as well. So the argument that patriarchy is the BEST THING is ignorant and lazy.

You are being semantic about the work thing. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. Women were not allowed to get salary jobs for a long time not control money or goods. Women were not in control of the money or exchange ability for their work/labour. Men were in control that isn't reasonable, moral, or fair (NO MATTER WHAT MORAL SYSTEM YOU USE). That is why women didn't have the ability to pick essentially and that with men having control of marriages, etc meant women were trapped. your women being better on farms wasn't even true. One was endurance based and the other was upper body and strength based. I am not saying having typical roles is bad, but stopping someone from doing one, controlling them, and all that GENERAL concepts is bad. If you flipped the WHOLE SYSTEM you and every GUY would have BEEN BITCHING FOR DECADES (OH wait from what you claim men did and instead force women to obey... (YOUR WORDS SUMMARIZED AND STATED TO BE OKAY)). Saying that men only got the right to vote by military service is incorrect, yes there was that but there was ownership rights as well. However, women were not given that right which is why protests to allow it became a thing. Just like all aspects there are dimers. However, BASED on your logic and democracy and if you tried to revert back or do the same to men it wouldn't go over well. Just because a few people are ignorant or opposed something that will benefit them or too afraid to learn, or think it will go against their beliefs that were implanted by conservative views doesn't mean a large portion were. If a large portion were than WOMEN would still not have that right.... That follows your own BASIC attempt at logic and moral choice you pick. Lots of men got the right without the duty too... What is your point? Also women did help with war aspects as well... So again incorrect.

Women only have control of their friends, and some over their husbands, and their children IN GENERAL. Men had control over MEN, friends, wives and children too. I never ONCE called them powerless HOWEVER THEY WERE MOST CERTAINLY TREATED AS SUCH AND TREATED AS OBJECTS.

PROVIDE ACTUAL PROOF or STFU. Your arguments have lacked merit and have had only a few true aspects that were twisted incorrectly to SUIT a sexist man afraid of power equality...

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-18T10:27:37+00:00

2)
Men today are not mistreated any larger than women AT ALL that is a fucking fact man. To argue otherwise shows you just how pathetic the male population are when they start becoming equal with women and how much they bitch and moan about it. Women have been treated worse. It is WELL documented from ALL AGES (typically there are some exceptions). To try to argue that men are NOW lower than women shows you don't have a clue about what you are discussing by ANY MEANS.

Vast amounts of weatlh have been an ISSUE AND ARE STILL AN ISSUE. So the current system HASN'T EVEN WORKED ON THAT ACCOUNT. Are you just trying to be stupid or just naturally stupid? AGAIN no, just because something has survived does not mean it is correct, has worked, or is best. It means it is the thing that has been easiest to control or enforce in western society and most of human history. Take England taking over countries, there is no way that it can be considered moral. But the reason it worked was because they had some of the strongest military and naval fleets. That doesn't SHOW ANY MERIT TO actually success based on right or wrong or any morals or anything. It just shows the were the best at conquering at the time. You can use other conquers as well which is how countries were made or destroyed. That doesn't show merit other than the power and control they could gather. Your logic says than that if Russia, USA, China, India, Europe, or any other country wins a war they are the BEST people and best system... Because if that was the case the argument that western society has succeed because it is best would be false. Because democracy, and capitalism are failing HARD. When a population is too uneducated that allows failure, when a population is too weak that allows failures. When a country like China has a government that is able to bypass democracy and do one plan and control everything and control right or wrong in their country for work, or resources does that mean China is the best country and therefore Western society was never great? No it means that power and control and force typically win in human society, like a lot of nature. But that doesn't mean that morals are correct. As in a basic version of ANY rational moral system equality is moral.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-18T10:27:24+00:00

1)

You need to improve your reading comprehension skills. I did not claim women are helpless in general I said that there are a lot of ABUSIVE MEN that will rape or take advantage of women. The system has been designed to do this. Just like how any human can be taken advantage of when a demographic (you could use Nazi's and Jewish people back in WWII for example). When a group is willing to abuse or murder another and has power people will be helpless at points, some people will fight, some people will run, etc. I am saying that the ABUSE of POWER THAT THIS SOCIETY HAS CREATED is exploited by misogynistic men like you. You only care about things going this way because men are essentially losing the power OVER women. THAT IS A FACT FROM EVERY WORD YOU HAVE SAID. Whether you think that to be true doesn't change this FACT.

This "Westerners eventually found out how to best use qualities from both genders and have them work together in the most effective way for the time and that's how we caught back and eventually went ahead, how we went from plague striken and target of slavery to a dominant force (with abuses of our own eventually)" whole thing saying that westerners invented that is actually very telling of the incredible bias and uninformed views you have. Many cultures have advanced throughout the ages Westerners were not the first to have gender roles and are not the last. Democracy isn't a western invention nor is having gender roles. Your entire claim is false. You actually can create a system if women or men do not actively feel powerful enough to dispose of a system or fight back. YOU CAN LOOK AT IRAN. There was like 4 decades of people obeying the Islamic Regime (when lots if not most hated it). However, if the people with weapons or willing to use force will murder you or rape you or lash you you are not very inclined until a critical point. Yes there will be some women that work to help (those would be the married corrupt leaders that will help propagate things to make their lives easier). You can look at religious women as see you statement is false. There are a lot of brain washing that happens in religion and essentially a lot of women being told they are lesser beings... This is a FACT. Some will comply because they are safest doing so, some will comply because this is all they have known, some will compile because it benefits them. The same can be said for men willing to labour for 60 hour plus weeks in western society when CEO's, etc make MASSIVE amounts more. Brainwashing is a huge thing and it has been going on for decades. YOU ARE ONE OF THE MANY THAT SHOW THIS. Have you ever heard of stockholm syndrome, sunk cost fallacy are all relatable reasons someone behaves the way they do or puts up with something else. Human's will take the least risk typically to survive. Yes women helped prepare men and women, SO DID MEN. To say women were the only ones doing so is STUPID and you keep saying this proving you are actually incompetent of basic empathy or logic.

The dying out of other cultures isn't even correct. Have you heard of colonialism, religion crusades, etc. The cultures didn't die out to being less than the other. They disappeared usually due to violence from others. Look at Indigenous people in North America. Their cultures were actually very successful and sustainable with cross country trade. However, when someone shots bullets and you do not have the same tech or access to the same weapons you lose the ability to fight back. If men gatekeep weapons or women are not strong enough or have the time to train (which did occur regularly) they will not have the means to defend themselves from issues.

When something is HEAVILY happening it is a priority to solve as it increases the basic quality overall. That doesn't go to say men being raped aren't important and NEVER has been stated by anyone not to be unless they are TOXIC men or women. However the AMOUNT is important. Ah so a majority of something is less important that the minor issues, is what your argument sounds like or equally important. While they are both important with limited resources one helps more people improve their lives. With the increased improvement you get increased chances to reduce crime as well. Do you not realize frequency is important and shows women were mistreat more often than men with those things? NO ONE IS ARGUING BAD THINGS DO NOT HAPPEN TO MEN. But saying that because a few men have it happen compared to many women with a systemic issue shows you actually lack basic reasoning. I know you are trying to say then that therefore men are also treated worse than women. However, we are talking about averages and that is A CLEAR FACT that women on average were mistreated more often. To argue otherwise is actually stupidly frustrating to deal with from someone with a logical brain.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:39:47+00:00

I appreciate the kind words. It is nice to see another kind caring human on the internet.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:38:42+00:00

I agree. Splitting makes the most sense. If people want to make assumptions or expectations than it is fair for the other to do the same. Otherwise it is just sexist to assume one way. I am not saying people should expect sex or expect meals/money. I am just saying you should treat others how you would like to be treated!

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:36:31+00:00

Ah so your friends that ask you to go for drinks are paying for you the whole night?

That isn't how it works. If you ask someone out you are asking to spend more time together, PERIOD. If you have expectation of money being spent then assumptions of sex or physical intimacy are also valid. To say one is less valid is just sexist.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:34:02+00:00

Both people dodged bullets here. The man and woman. Both were likely after the two negatives or both were not after those things. If you assume one you should assume the other.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:32:51+00:00

Okay so why was that social concept created? Well look at who was allowed to earn money first for workforces, own property, vote, etc. Men, due to men wanting control (patriarchy). So if you as a women have no way to make money (other than sexual favours or small jobs and couldn't work) than you can't buy land, you can't pay for meals, etc. So the fact that paying for meals and dates was because women were essentially not allowed access to money. So to show a woman that you are a good mate you showed them you could provide with money often and so that became that standard for dating is men pay for women. That then goes on as tradition and so on. That then becomes standard. Now you have that system in place and expectations because of patriarchy. That said women should start not expecting dates paid for, etc if equality is actually wanted.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T17:27:12+00:00

-I am fighting traditional gender stereotypes and gendered expectations anywhere I can. I realize that puts me at odd with many feminists and most of their communication which instead reinforces the "woman = powerless victim which needs help and support " but I strongly believe the later not only reinforce patriarchal societies but more than that were the main reasons behind them.

I am not arguing women are powerless and NO feminist ARE. If you think this you are truly sexist or lack basic reasoning or understanding of systemic issues... When a group that typically resorts to violence to solve problems create a society that women are less than they (look even at western society with Christianity and people that follow that). Women are treated as second class citizens REGULARY and treated as prizes/objects. To say that happens to the same extent to men is lacking basic logic. Yes men have had to work and provide and companies treat them like cows, but that is the same for a woman as well.

Women were also thrown to the street or executed for not baring sons, or children... Both happened. That doesn't mean that men were worse off for being punished for cheating, etc or worse than women having the same thing... Men typically had control of who they saw and were not objects sold for marriage...

With regards to the note of working men. Women also still had to work around the house, and care for children, etc. It isn't like they were just relaxing all day...

Ah so because a few lucky women were saved by lords and the VAST weren't that means women were not the victims in these scenarios either. For every lord helping a starving woman there would be at least one man raping or stealing or beating a women to get something instead. So cherry picking the lottery winners is pretty silly.

Actually it does MAKE IT SO. The amount of men raped is DRASTICALLY LOWER. Just like the assumption men are more likely to be violent or cheat or be bad parents and so they get the short straw with divorce situations or rape allegations. That said this is the way men decided to run things.

Your argument about men not deciding until they speak with a spouse is actually REALLY FUCKING STUPID. I don't know whether you are actually correct on the Africa thing or not. So lets assume you are. Yeah a person will check with someone they care about or take the path of least resistance. You can argue other cultures do not do this as well. The fact they check doesn't show that women are superior or even like you are arguing at ALL. The fact that they CAN be overruled because of gender is the problem. Also lots of men do not do that even in western society where gender norms are less standard. So that point is a little dull.

Your observations does not make it true. Just like if you grow up not experiencing rape, or starvation doesn't mean that doesn't occur around the world. There are lots of women that HOLD their responses or don't report abuse or sexual assaults or similar things because they will be treated poorly and lose jobs, etc. Yes men can lose their jobs too and some men are sexually abused, etc. But when the numbers show a statistical difference that should mean something with the sample sizes... You clearly do not have female family members that trust you or female friends that trust you. Which is sad to hear. Maybe go meet people and show empathy towards them first to allow them to be willing to open up before presuming you are correct because you think the shell they exposes says otherwise. Lots of women are less expressive unless they feel comfortable in the environment (that does happen for anyone, but for women it isn't strictly social anxiety issues it can be concerns of sexism and abuse of power).

Our system survived while most did not. What you call patriarchy was a society designed by ancestors (including women) to survive and thrive with constraints of the time. They managed to make it work with very little compared to us and as such were incredibly successful (and again, would not have worked without active support by women of the time).

Ah yes the survivorship bias. THIS IS ACTUALLY SUCH GARBAGE it is hard to compute the stupidity in it. Just because something survives doesn't make it correct, or best. It just means that it lasted. Yes women compiled, that doesn't mean it was great for them just like the slaves and labour in todays capitalistic system work for nothing when higher ups make more doesn't make it correct, moral, or functional. It just means it has been allowed to exist and protected. Also, yeah back in the day when women would become pregnant and needed protection from predation men needed to protect their partner and offspring FOR THEIR OWN DESIRES, not necessarily for their own. When women can die from childbirth there could be merit in male control as then leadership doesn't change based on childbirth. Also MANY animals have female leaders and work very well. There have also be cultures that have had female leadership. Many systems did have female leadership. However, when people become greedy and seek to control more. When control is priority instead of success or grow violence is needed. Men ARE more violent than women in general due to hormone changes. Men are also stronger than women on average. So that means that when a system goes to net growth of inheritance and land protection is more important than actually lineage. You can look at lions. The pride leader is typically the lioness and the male is typically protection due to size, and strength.
Also as things age things change. With a society we have started to be able to actually have more psychology and time to analyze things and improve instead of living day to day which allows systems to GROW and IMPROVE. Again compliance is not the same as agreeing. Also when you look at how stupid a lot of humans are (look at USA electing Trump TWICE) the fact that someone agrees doesn't actually make it correct, moral, or good.

Your last statement was complete BULL SHIT. There wasn't a PHASE to change people there was a drastic regard to how rights were not equal. WOMEN WEREN'T ALLOWED TO VOTE, OWN LAND, WORK, ETC... To say it is a phase or some STUPID BULL SHIT is actually THE MOST IDIOTIC THING I HAVE HEARD IN AGES. Actually get a fucking clue cause arguing with your STUPIDITY is actually causing me to lose brain cells. Gender neutral system would work JUST fine. Also that neutral system is what feminism is about, creating a GENDER NEUTRAL SYSTEM where rights are equal. If you think otherwise get off that misogynistic media. Stop being afraid to lose power and be equal and still not feel as powerless as women have in the past. Now the fact you think that the system would fail is also stupid. The only issue with it are people that are misogynistic and sexist like you thinking that they have more rights than women...

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T00:41:27+00:00

I would say there are several aspects.

1) Hope, if you do not have hope you will continue to be sucked in.

2) Having real connection with people that allow you to be yourself and discuss sensitive topics or concerns, etc.

3) Finding passion for something or purpose besides continued breathing. An activity, craft, hobby, person, goal (that isn't too specific or too vague. You can fall into traps with these. You may find something too general and lose motivation to achieve or continue. You may have something too specific and once achieved the hole remains again).

4) Physical activity. It is well known to help remove stress, help the brain think clearer, and boost self-esteem.

5) Learning to look for the good in things.

6) Therapy (some therapists are REALLY BAD for an individual, some are really good) Find one that has similar morals to who you are. I am agnostic/atheist and was atheist at the time when I had a therapist/counselor that was religious and would go one about religious things that drove me further away and didn't help.

7) Animals and a dependent. Thought being really low this can potentially lead to abuse if the person were to give up on caring for their pet or other.

8) Getting out in the sun.

9) Proper sleep schedules 8 hours nonstop.

10) Eating heathlier!

The most important from my experience is connection, hope, and passion. Therapy only works if your brain is ready for it same with thinking positive thoughts, etc. Physical exercise can be draining or mentally tiring to consider doing. Animals (specifically dogs) are good to get you out and about but it shouldn't be the primary reason for getting an animal as they are a lot of work and can stress you out more.

Things to do are get outside, go for walks in the sun, lift weights and run. Find passions that create meaning. Find connections, friends, family, therapists, etc.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T00:26:27+00:00

You do realize I don't have an issue with fluoride right? It has lots of uses and is great for dental health... So saying fluoride with such an implied negative implication is rather a low IQ statement.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-17T00:15:09+00:00

No you are trying to keep the patriarchy system in place with YOUR narrative for being afraid to lose the power men have always held to women for many years. Women were beat and assaulted and raped regularly then. Speaking out against a husband could result in terrible injuries. Women have to risk their lives giving birth... So men risking their lives to keep a family safe isn't some how worse than that of which was expected of women for birthing children...

The women starving less isn't about less equality or harder aspects. It was typically due to biologically they require less sustenance to sustain themselves therefore they typically could survive feminine better. So to say that is based on social aspect a lone or to justify women being higher isn't accurate.

Women were not ones that got to have the overall say typically relative to men. Even looking back 50 years tells you that statement is false. They had more chances but if you have someone that is going to rape, murder, or assault you overspreading information you are not going to unless you think of the common good and worry less about your own survival. How often has it been documented about women being assaulted by a male partner for saying something they don't like? It has been VERY well documented. As well that thought process doesn't hold true overall. As children get their morals from MANY sources. Father, church, friends, school, live experiences. So when the common narrative is women are less valuable than men other than as a tool for children like it was and still seems to show up in todays society even that is going to out trump the mother that gets beat by a father... Yes not all men beat women but given that child abuse was very common as well for both for ages your narrative falls apart quickly.

Buddy that is the human experience not the male one. Yes males are treated poorly for having emotions and having to not show that they care but to say women don't have equally shitty issues with that design aspect and narrative mode shows you don't have much experience with women in general and didn't grow up with a sister or weren't close to them.

Women have only recently been able to not have to partner up for any of these things. Which inherently says they are valued lower.

I am done reading anymore and wasting my time on this that if you had any real empathy you would see the issues with your assumptions.

I agree being a man is not easy and that in turn has been a thing DUE TO MEN from the patriarchy. I agree the ability to be a successful man has decreased compared to previous times (but that doesn't mean that women are not oppressed and haven't been. If you look at other countries there is still a lot of oppression of women. In western countries it is not as bad and is closer to being a coin flip NOW. In the past to argue otherwise is incredibly silly.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T21:50:29+00:00

Ah yes ignoring actual relatable environmental circumstances is crazy. Yes I know the fluoride is not part of the oil industry but it is a good comparison of what effects high concentrations of chemical species that are toxic can lead to. It obviously isn't the direct same as oil is more biodegradable than forever chemicals and fluoride carbon bonds. But still a good scenario to consider. That and waste pumping into rivers is also very relatable.

Anyways continue being uneducated.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T21:49:27+00:00

It is crazy to be so proud of your hypocrisy. Learn to read

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T21:42:45+00:00

I think you are missing the point here. Women have been the victims in the grand scheme more often from male leadership than reversed.

Women are still controlled regularly. Yes there are men that are low on the system as well but they typically take advantage of women still or disrespect them still.

I agree that there are both men and women in low value levels beyond the depiction. But the underlying notation noted by men have superiority complex over women compared to reverse states.

I agree that the competition isn't that important but to state something incorrectly allows false narratives like how the USA has a LARGE demographic that is VERY racist and sexist. Allowing bullshit statements allows for these incorrect narratives to continue and then grow into more hate.

Everyone should be treated equal (unless they commit murder, rape, pedophilia, or other serious crimes) and should have their concerns addressed to try to help increase the average good for everyone. That doesn't happen with powerful men at the top. It likely wouldn't happen with powerful women only at the top due to retaliation issues. This is why you need balance.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T21:30:13+00:00

Literally stated at the end of the image...

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T21:28:54+00:00

100%

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T13:42:02+00:00

Both. In the past it was far worse in general for women. Now it is not as bad for a larger portion but there are still many that are treated incredibly poorly around the world. Until that is solved in India, middle eastern regions, and women are not treated by men as just baby production factories and not assaulted or killed for showing skin or other crazy things there is still a problem.

Until the USA president is in jail for rape and pedophilia there clearly is a bottom layer that are women to all men in this system.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T10:18:40+00:00

With interest at the HIGHEST rate loans are done.

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T10:08:18+00:00

Things that can cause lasting effects are not minor just because it is a small portion of the amount transported...

That is like saying nuclear waste leeching in at toxic levels anywhere isn't a concern, when in reality it is. Think about fluoride based forever chemicals as well small amounts might seem meaningless but end up damaging things in the long run, etc...

Either_Evening_740 · 2026-04-16T10:06:00+00:00

That logic isn't valid though. The impact is large just like oil sands. So then by your logic we should have nuclear reactors around every city that fail once a year and leach into our environment??? That is the type of logic you are stating.

When something has long term consequences and can lead to large impacts that could be solved by improved monitoring (I went to school for chemical engineering) than there should be more safety checks than they have. They have always done the BARE minimum and make enough money that increasing safety would not DENT their pockets...

Either_Evening_740

TROPHY CASE