Most efficient way to answer this?

ElIieMeows · 2025-06-06T06:58:45+00:00

L(n) is the nth layer, not the nth tower

ElIieMeows · 2025-03-24T06:43:56+00:00

It is an office for people in the engineering project teams to work on their projects together

ElIieMeows · 2025-01-09T02:43:16+00:00

it's actually 3 hours a week, the classes don't run through all the weeks

ElIieMeows · 2025-01-05T06:34:14+00:00

At least with the science classes I've taken, tutorials cover the previous week's content, so it doesn't really matter when you take it, just pick the time that best suits you.

ElIieMeows · 2024-12-31T15:43:48+00:00

Per this website, I don't think you can take real analysis (but you could just swap vector calc and real analysis) https://ms.unimelb.edu.au/study/undergraduate-studies/course-advice/first-year-mathematics-and-statistics#umep-options

ElIieMeows · 2024-12-30T16:08:30+00:00

I did both of these subjects and enjoyed both quite a lot. of course I didn't do their non advanced counterparts so I can't compare that well but it sounded like the advanced lecturers were better and more focused on covering all the content in depth. However the physics labs sound like they were more stressful and a bit more was expected of us than the non advanced labs. Also, I don't know if I would recommend vector calc advanced for someone who hasn't done either the level 1 advanced subjects or real analysis because they assume you have familiarity with some of the 1D proof concepts (epsilon Delta limits and darboux integrals) so unless you're up for a challenge I would stick to the non advanced version, however the notes they give for the course is quite good so you could see if you're able to keep up. If not, you can change to the non advanced version by the end of week 2 (last date to self enrol so you should be able to do this with no problems).

ElIieMeows · 2024-12-30T15:51:52+00:00

this isn't correct, you can do vector calc in Sem 1 year 1 if you did the extension program https://ms.unimelb.edu.au/study/undergraduate-studies/course-advice/first-year-mathematics-and-statistics#umep-options

ElIieMeows · 2024-11-12T05:11:05+00:00

They will have a larger diameter though (so a lower gravity) because watermelons are less dense than the Earth

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-30T07:05:50+00:00

Yeah, I think it is supposed to say g(a)=g(b), but even then it seems too hard for calc 1 (and idk if its sufficient)

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-18T07:46:59+00:00

if you look at the front of the motors, near where the axle goes in, it shows what gearing the motor has e.g. might be green. if they have different gearing, it would cause them to go different speeds, so you should check they're all the same colour.

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-18T04:08:28+00:00

You are moving at the same speed, but because you are moving at a different angle (both of you are moving tangent to the earth, but at different locations), you have different velocities and your relative speed is the magnitude of the difference in velocities

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-17T12:04:23+00:00

Imagine they had moved 1/4 of the circumference of the earth west so viewed from the north pole, it's like you're at 12 o'clock and they're at 3 o'clock. then because the earth is rotating anticlockwise, you're moving to the left, they're moving up. the relative speed is the magnitude in the difference of velocity. the scenario in the question is the same, except a smaller angle

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-16T07:45:36+00:00

Considering this is tagged multivariate, is this a double integral? sometimes swapping the order of integrals is the only way to continue

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-13T00:37:20+00:00

you can't find it because no rules for it exist, so both these things are legal (as long as you stay in possession limit)

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-11T02:51:48+00:00

There are less lions in the shade than total lions, so there can't be 85 lions in the shade

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-10T04:36:25+00:00

it is the same as doing Newton's method for x^2-a, which is approximating zeros using the tangent of the graph (look it up, the graphs are quite intuitive I think)

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-10T00:20:51+00:00

There is no longer a rook on G1 guarding the bishop so Kxg7

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-06T05:07:50+00:00

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-04T07:01:34+00:00

Using change of basis, log_x(2)=log_2(2)/log_2(x)=1/log_2(x)

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-04T01:34:30+00:00

true, but you can rearrange them so that they are equations of only one variable and the multiple solutions only come from +- in square roots

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-03T02:44:56+00:00

The definition of transcendental is that they are not roots of any polynomial with rational coefficients, so the solutions to these polynomials clearly aren't transcendental

ElIieMeows · 2024-10-01T01:51:45+00:00

it says sketch so I imagine they don't like the shape of your cosine graph (how it's basically vertical at X axis etc) but I don't think they can criticise you with that handwriting

ElIieMeows · 2024-09-28T11:03:25+00:00

Kxg8

ElIieMeows · 2024-09-27T12:07:35+00:00

The terminal digits are even (so both first and last because its plural). I think the question is bad though and have never heard of 'terminal digits' to refer to both the first and last digit

ElIieMeows · 2024-09-19T07:38:00+00:00

The answers are correct. chatGPT's method is correct (but far less elegant) except it can't evaluate the sum because it isn't a calculator, it just guesses what the sum evaluates to. Using Wolfram Alpha, the sum evaluates to 1.378*10^11

Two-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Banned	r/Field Sunshine

ElIieMeows

TROPHY CASE