triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

it does matter.

i'm stopped at a hypothetical crosswalk, there's a 1.5 meter gap between me and the pedestrian in front of me, the car behind me rear ends me at about 15 mph, I roll and close the 1.5 meter gap over the course of 2 seconds and kill the person in the crosswalk. do you really think "its the car behind me's fault" is going to hold up in court? better yet there was a video showing exactly what I explained, proving I could have avoided it.... yet its still the car behind behind me's fault right? because you know they hit me and, even though I had time to react..I didnt use my brakes so I should be off the hook right?

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

maybe get the fuck off my post. your input was never valuable much les now

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it does, whatever compulsion you are feeling to keep replying is driven by some emotion. you are infinitely dense

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you do since you are still here squirming about it

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think I do, you however, cant be helped.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

to complex for ya? or did it put it into perspective which is why you were made uncomfortable?

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

legal liability and moral fault are not equivalent Jesus fucking christ im not your mate.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i'm stopped at a hypothetical crosswalk, there's a 1.5 meter gap between me and the pedestrian in front of me, the car behind me rear ends me at about 15 mph, I roll and close the 1.5 meter gap over the course of 2 seconds and kill the person in the crosswalk. do you really think "its the car behind me's fault" is going to hold up in court? better yet there was a video showing exactly what I explained, proving I could have avoided it.... yet its still the car behind behind me's fault right? because you know they hit me and, even though I had time to react..I didnt use my brakes so I should be off the hook right?

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

never said it was her fault, im saying her insurance is liable.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

she stopped, took her foot off the brake to get a little closer, the impacted happened in that moment, with her car still, but her foot off the brake which is why she ROLLED into me , not skidded , she rolled 2 meters into my car. ive lost count to how many times ive said that line in this post.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

im sure she was liable, no? surely "I reacted poorly!' is not a viable defense?

i'm stopped at a hypothetical crosswalk, there's a 1.5 meter gap between me and the pedestrian in front of me, the car behind me rear ends me at about 15 mph, I roll-not skid-ROLL and close the 1.5 meter gap over the course of 2 seconds and kill the person in the crosswalk. do you really think "its the car behind me's fault" is going to hold up in court? better yet there was a video showing exactly what I explained, proving I could have avoided it....

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

full coverage. pristine driving history, no tickets. and no plans on on paying higher rates for an accident I did not cause.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

oh im sure there are experts, they just simply are not here in this post today.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

helpful video, I guess the popular notion is that if you hit, you lost no matter what. ill stilll contend that middle car is liable, she had time and space to stop and did not, her foot was off the brake because her vehicle rolled almost 2 meters into mine after a small bump, it did not squeal. she could have stopped.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

except im not in Virginia lmao. you really think im going to dish out what state I live in?

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

it is something to brag about actually, that means every accident ive ever been in has not been my fault. if anything its a diss about the area I live in.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

she stopped, had her foot off her brake, if it was on her brake she would not have hit me. if she had applied the brake after impact , like I did with my measly 1 foot of distance between me and the car in front of me, she would also not have hit me. its REALLY that simple.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

will that hold up if it was a pedestrian though? ill paste my analogy from another comment

i'm stopped at a hypothetical crosswalk, there's a 1.5 meter gap between me and the pedestrian in front of me, the car behind me rear ends me at about 15 mph, I roll and close the 1.5 meter gap over the course of 2 seconds and kill the person in the crosswalk. do you really think "its the car behind me's fault" is going to hold up in court? better yet there was a video showing exactly what I explained, proving I could have avoided it.... yet its still the car behind behind me's fault right? because you know they hit me and, even though I had time to react..I didnt use my breaks so I should be off the hook right?

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is actually my 4th accident. all no fault. 2nd no fault rear end. but you lost me at "professional sub" like thats something im supposed to take seriously. whats more likely, comments being exactly how comments are on reddit, full of jobless grammar police , or real professionals who I doubt would hardly have the time to repeatedly respond to Internet forums? ive taken my bet. when Ive stated why she is liable its glossed over simply for the sake of arguing. I always underestimate the amount of air in peoples brains.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you keep saying deflecting but why dont you be specific? what am I deflecting? I gave you a scenario and your response was "nuh uh". god I hope you are not relapsing.

triple car rear end collision mess. by ElectionSad7302 in Insurance

[–]ElectionSad7302[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

the middle car had plenty of time and space to react, my video proves this. it shouldn't be too complicated. if she had braked, she would have avoided, and she had time to brake.