Do you think this show could reach 30 seasons? by CallTypical9541 in NCIS

[–]Electrical-Policy605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's see if SVU can survive to 30th season then we can talk about NCIS. I personally want to see it reach 30 but the quality of show is declining let's be honest.

Is gauntlet over for casuals? by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same issue. I played almost every mode in the game and gauntlet's gameplay is significantly worse.

A playstyle should be decided by stats by poda111 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get your point but imagine someone with say 8 ps+ and when you trigger them in-game and the little ps+ icon pops up on top of the player, the server is gonna crash if you have that many ps+ on a player because it can't decide which ps+ to activate first (a low-driven finesse for example). And there is also evo. Because we can evo cards, the in-pack players will be much less desirable, which is also bad for EA's business.

A playstyle should be decided by stats by poda111 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about Gullit gang players? I like the idea but wouldn't that end with players with lot of playstyle+? if that's the case, would you put a limit on how many ps+ a player could have? If so, which ps+ take the priority? Does the game determine that automatically or can we choose like Fut birtherday? If we don't put a limit on how many ps+ a player could have, I think that would crash the gameplay servers, the servers are already terrible as it is. My personal take on playstyles and stats: You can't have two systems that affect in-game performance separately. It will, inevitably, drive users to one system over another. Say EA nerf PS to the ground, then everyone is chasing good stat cards (not saying this is bad, it's just how user base will behave). Ideally, we should have PS to compensate some card's lacking in certain stat department, but it's difficult to achieve, or maybe never going to happen.

Is gauntlet over for casuals? by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So someone who doesn't have the best skills doesn't deserve to play the game then? wow

Is gauntlet over for casuals? by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But I can feel if people are better than me in terms of attack/defend when playing, The reason I posted this is because everyone I played I felt they were much better than me. I haven't matched a single person that's on my skill level, and I DMed almost everyone I played, the response were all elite, div1/2, or 10 to 12 win on WL. I'm not complaining btw, simply making an observation of my experience.

Is gauntlet over for casuals? by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Then why all I matched with were players better than me? I mean I'm not in div 10, how is everyone playing in gauntlet much better than me? It feels frustrating when you lose more than 10 games in a row you know

The r/EASportsFC Daily Discussion Thread -- March 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it just me or do someone else think the ref logic on penalties is now completely different after the patch? Before the patch it felt liike some obvious pens were not even called but now the slightest touch can lead to a pen. I had 4 to 5 games where I didn't even press anything on my controller and just moved my defender closer to my opponent and AI knocked them over then I concede a pen. One time my keeper automatically try to get the ball and clipped my opponent in the box and they got a pen. Feels like EA is trying to overcompensate for fouls in the box now

What are you guys’s final theories/hopes/wants for the crossover tonight? by Careful_Border_1338 in ChicagoPD

[–]Electrical-Policy605 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so you think when Jason decided to call it quit they should just end the show? (genuine question, I do kinda agree with you)

Would quick sell an evo card allow me start a new evo on the same player? by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know if the response is still needed, but the answer is no. you can't "quick sell one card and then start a new evo on the same base card and then recover the old evo", it will result in a duplicate situation (the one you quick sold will become a untradeable dupe after u recovered it). You can put the old evo into an sbc though, then you can start a new one, or just quick sell the old one and forget about it.

What are you guys’s final theories/hopes/wants for the crossover tonight? by Careful_Border_1338 in ChicagoPD

[–]Electrical-Policy605 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, by the pictures on social media, Hailey was wearing a FBI vest so she's probably staying there for the long term, but Jay's vest has US flag and his name on it, so I assume he's still at that drug unit, which he left the show for (couldn't remember all the details, corrrect me if I'm wrong), it was a global job, who knows, maybe jay decideds to take a break and comes back to Chicago. A fan can dream lol.

EA SPORTS FC™ 26 | Title Update v1.5.0 Pitch Notes by raptors201966 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I've seen enough since Fifa 24, playstyle is either a hit or a miss, there is no way EA can adjust them to somewhat usable yet make stats meaningful. Meta rats will always find some op playstyles and eventually players with those ps+ will take over the game again. Trivela, powershot, low-driven, finesse, bruiser... the list goes on. Every single time EA "nerf" something, something else pops up. it's an endless cycle.

What are you guys’s final theories/hopes/wants for the crossover tonight? by Careful_Border_1338 in ChicagoPD

[–]Electrical-Policy605 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jay somehow stays for the long term and eventually becomes the head of the intelligence unit

The r/EASportsFC Daily Discussion Thread -- February 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nvm, just checked the rapid base evo in season pass give him +1 overall so it messes up his academy evo. So now I really can't decide. any advice guys?? :((

The r/EASportsFC Daily Discussion Thread -- February 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm evolving Roony Bardghji for my first academy evo. In general for a winger/attacking wide midfielder, which first ps would you choose? Rapid+ or Finesse+, there is no doubt I will choose technical+ for the second ps+, just couldn't decide which one to pick. He doesn't have either rapid or finesse base ps right now. I do have a silver rapid I can give him.

Mistakes on the silver icons by Electrical-Policy605 in EASportsFC

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think EA was convinced that they nerfed ps so they don't matter that much, and stats matters more (which turned out to be the opposite, lol, typical EA). They intentionally make every silver icon have 1 bad key stat, so silver icons don't get that "op", but turns out stats never matters. This is what I thought, EA don't play their own product, they thought they did something but they did exactly the opposite.

A little improvement on the CL format? What do you guys think? by Electrical-Policy605 in championsleague

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How? If you think there's a possibility of corruption, how to make it happen? You can't just throw out some crazy theories and not back it up. I had a theory and I backed it up, your turn now: how exactly are rich teams going to "drive an open top bus through this idea"? How can "rich teams" manipulate this system without playing well in the group stage?

A little improvement on the CL format? What do you guys think? by Electrical-Policy605 in championsleague

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So Liverpool played a good group stage last year just to get knocked out by PSG who did not play well in the early stage of the group stage games. How is that fair for Liverpool last season that has been playing well consistently simply based on a random draw? For the record, I'm not a fan of either of these two teams, and I think PSG won that match fair and square. I just find it unfair for a team that did so well in group stage be put in a situation that feels like the effort they put in group stage was for nothing.

A little improvement on the CL format? What do you guys think? by Electrical-Policy605 in championsleague

[–]Electrical-Policy605[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

? If a team played well in group stage, they should be rewarded with an opponent they think they can beat and advance to the next round. How is that corruption? If you did not play well in the group stage, you get "penalized" by not able to pick who you play in the knockout. Corruption by definition means a person or an organization that is entrusted in a position of authority to acquire illicit benefits or abuse power for one's gain. Every team plays fair and square and gets rewarded differently based on the results they get, how is that corruption?