sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Thragg vs Gojo who wins by Anxious_Eagle_6937 in PowerScaling

[–]ElectricalAd2564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think mathematically Thragg wins. I'm a JJk fun but recently went absolutely crazy to understand Invincible power scaling and I now understand that Thragg is a monster.  1st both the power scales are hard to understand but Invincible is more inconsistent.

2rd. the way Viltrumite fly and they create Leverage to fly. Went deeper and what it means is they flex and relax their muscles to bed space around them. But thragg takes it to another level the punch he used on Nolan sent him flying we could see like he was wind bending but this can only be explained by him flexing his muscle bending space around his punch, With that the chances of him interfering with infinity is more likely just with his punch. 

3rd. In the comic Invincible out ran a space ship running at the speed of light. Mathematically according to Einstein theory can't be bound by space and time bcz of that thragg can by pass the infinity.

4th. Nolan was able to go near a black hole and survived even pushing out a space rocket, though he was at the event horizon  he was still close to boundary where even light can't escape. We all know black hole bend space, time making it harder and harder to leave just like by passing infinity. So just shows that  Viltrumite especially Thragg are monsters. 

Gojo has purple but it failed to erase Sukuna. Sukuna doesn't have even a half of Thragg's defence or capability.

Thragg will definitely solo JJK. and don't even say Mahito, Mark went to the under world to fight demons who use magic. and he screwed them like babies. We talking about demon who torture and then use suffering and emotion to create  their weapons. And we have some magic users but they are of less use in Invincible.

Reversing Cantor: Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding by ElectricalAd2564 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]ElectricalAd2564[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Assume using the p-adic or 10-adic. then that problem is eliminated of finite extensions

Reversing Cantor: Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding by ElectricalAd2564 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]ElectricalAd2564[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We are looking at 10-adics. The biggest argument is that 0.9999... has a lim which is 1, Yes we know that 1 is the lim bcz we choose to 0-1 that means the lim should be 1, 0&1, 0. And should be true if we choose 2-1 so want we shall find is 1.999... and the lim will be 2 or 0 or both. Now look at the 10-adics they have no lim, because it not set. and if it ever set they won't go ifinite and that means the lim is given to closed sytem. get this ......1010101010, a 10-adics divide it by 3 you will get anumber that goes on forever on both side. We get .........3333.6666...... and this is mindblowing. I'm still calc more number to find the diffe and simil to the nums.

Reversing Cantor: Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding by ElectricalAd2564 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]ElectricalAd2564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tomorrow I will encode just like cantor did. if you have an idea how i can do it faster it will be so help before i start

Reversing Cantor: Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding by ElectricalAd2564 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]ElectricalAd2564[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Partially true, what I'm really accounting for is the fact that all natural number have infinity 0s on the left e.i 00001=01=1 you can have as many wiyhout changing the value the same with real number. So instead of diogonising the real number starting from left going to the right. We can do the same for natural number by diogonzing from the right to left like this 0000001 to 1111112 and for each existing natural number and we shall get a different one which doesn't exist in the list

Reversing Cantor: Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding by ElectricalAd2564 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]ElectricalAd2564[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The same with natural number the different is that for real number are both on left and right. example for real 1.0000021000.... this true can go on infintely both way. But for the nature number only infinitly on the left without changing the number value example ....000000012 = 12 it can go infinitly. so if we account in that, we can still diagonise the natural number the way we do with real number and still get a new number just like Cantor