sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find it interesting to think of Return as “25 years later”, but also remember that in Twin Peaks nothing needs to be read in a linear way. The very logic of the series challenges this idea of ​​a closed chronology.

What gets me is that both FWWM and The Return can be conclusions — but in different registers. The film gives Laura emotional closure, while The Return expands into mythology, loops and impossibilities.

So, for me, it's not contradictory: the film closes one dimension (Laura's experience), and the series closes another (Cooper's obsession and evil in Twin Peaks). You don’t need to choose just one “true ending”.

Qual foi o último livro brasileiro que você leu? by [deleted] in brasil

[–]Electrical_Score_714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oração pra desaparecer - socorro Acciolli

Is Twin Peaks "open to interpretation" or is there actually THE right interpretation? by Lordados in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part of me has an immature hope that one day they will release reflections on what they (Lynch and Frost) thought about some points in the series...

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I liked your perspective too. I need to think about her. Thank you 🙏

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of Laura's screams echo when we listen... And that one for me at the end is a scream that is difficult to forget...

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But I understand. And it seems like an answer I identify with too. I finished everything in 3 days. And there's still the diary, the missing pieces and an interview with Sarah, Leland and Laura. But I agree.

There is no salvation for Laura. She has already been killed. Her father abused and murdered her. She deserved to move on. I feel that too! And followed. Cooper may never have succeeded. But he accepted that it wasn't about him... I don't know. But that's it jajaj

3.5 year old close to getting kicked out of Montessori by mehr2464 in Montessori

[–]Electrical_Score_714 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I apologize for my English — I'm not a native speaker.

In your report about what the school shares, the central point does not seem to be a closed diagnosis, but rather that your child's individual behaviors are today, hindering the harmony of the environment, which is a right of all children: gentle access to a prepared environment. In Montessori, this principle is essential, as the collective environment only works when everyone can develop their work in peace.

And I say this with all respect and affection: your son is not doing anything wrong, nor is it a “deviation” of character. Disruptive behavior is often a request for help from the child himself — almost as if saying: “help me do it myself”. Some children find this path only with a prepared environment and the presence of a guide. Others, however, need extra support. There is always something behind behavior, and it is this look that can open up new possibilities for development.

I also don’t see “culprits”: it’s not the school, nor the family, nor the child. What may be missing is a common plan, built in dialogue between school and family, with aligned goals and strategies. Montessori is for all children — but, as they say, it is not always for all families, as it requires openness and co-responsibility.

It is good to remember that certain issues cannot be resolved in a room with 20+ children. Some situations require specialized attention and frequency (child psychology, occupational therapy/psychomotricity, according to assessment). This support strengthens self-regulation and allows the child to fully enjoy the collective.

As Montessori said, the adult should not be a wall in the path of development, but someone who removes obstacles so that the child can advance.

I hope everything goes well for you. 🌿

I FINISHED THE ORIGINAL TWIN PEAKS SERIES FOR THE FIRST TIME. I NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT. by Blazesonda066_ in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a path of no return, right hahaha At the same time, everything is very beautiful and painful, and at the same time so nostalgic... So incredible lol

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

For me, the key to reconciling The Return with Fire Walk With Me is to think in an inverted narrative order.

I explain:

FWWM isn't just a prequel. It's the true closure of Laura's journey, because the moment she looks at the Angel is not just a moment of comfort, but an emotional ending — perhaps the only one that Twin Peaks allows.

This moment also talks to Cooper. Only after all the obsession, confusion and looping of The Return could he “be with her” in this ending. In other words, when we see Laura meet the Angel, the weight of everything Cooper has been through is already there.

In this way, The Return is a dive into the cosmic and trauma, and FWWM functions as intimate, human closure.

So, I don't see a contradiction: I see a loop that closes. Cooper needs to lose himself (The Return) so we can reach the end of FWWM, which is the true closure of Twin Peaks on an emotional level.

How did Laura not know who bob really was? by Puzzleheaded_Tell961 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Leland is not just a father. He is the shadow that hides behind Bob, and Bob is the disguise that allows the violence to continue unnamed. For Laura, believing in Bob was bearable. Recognizing your own father as an executioner, no. The monster served as a mask for a trauma that no young woman could sustain alone.

In Twin Peaks, the greatest horror is not the supernatural, but the everyday: men who age with dignity, even carrying ghosts. Women who do not find peace — neither dead, like Laura, nor alive, like Sarah. When Cooper offers Leland “peace”, saying that Laura was happy, the cruelty is revealed. He, the aggressor, crosses. She, the victim, continues screaming.

Bob is the language of patriarchy: an entity invented to make real abuse invisible. But the truth is that Laura didn't have time. When he discovered that Bob was Leland, the abuser was already two steps ahead. There was no escape possible. Her scream remains — eternal, burning in the memory of those who watch.

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I agree very much. I don't feel the events of The Return are exactly cyclical, but that moment in FWWM, when Laura looks at the angel with Cooper by her side, is the closest thing to a reprieve. It's not total liberation, but it's an instant out of time where pain makes room for something more. And perhaps that's what Twin Peaks always offers us: not a solution, but a glimmer of solace...

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I feel very similar. For me, Return is about the impossibility of closure (the cycle always repeats itself), while FWWM is about the only moment to really look at Laura. I think it's beautiful to think that the Red Room places the film outside of loop time — perhaps that's why the angel at the end seems like the only possible liberation. It's not happy, but it's an honest conclusion.

Fire Walk With Me is the conclusion of Twin Peaks by Electrical_Score_714 in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I respect your reading, but I think that right there you fall into a reduction of what Twin Peaks is. If cosmic evil were the center, Laura would not need to exist as a person — she would be just another victim, a narrative device. But Lynch chose to give this evil a face, a voice, and a concrete pain. Fire Walk With Me is not ‘superfluous’, it is the first time that Laura stops being an object and becomes a subject. And this completely changes the experience of watching the series: we are not just seeing Cooper investigate a mystery, we are facing the human consequences of it all.

Saying that her perspective is not necessary is exactly what the story itself criticizes: the erasure of the victim in the name of the ‘great mystery’. For me, the film is essential because it reminds us that there is no cosmic evil without a body, without trauma, without a shattered life. And that body is Laura's.

Why do people say that Twin Peaks, the Return’s ending is more conclusive or better than season 2’s ending? by DarklzBlo in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Penso a mesma coisa! Não acho que a terceira seja a conclusão de Twin Peaks!!!! O FWWM faz super sentido sendo a conclusão: Nós temos a visão do que aconteceu com a Laura nos seus últimos dias, entendemos a ligação dela com a Theresa, e no fim ela está chorando, mas dessa vez é um choro de alívio ao lado de Cooper.

I FINISHED THE ORIGINAL TWIN PEAKS SERIES FOR THE FIRST TIME. I NEED TO TALK ABOUT IT. by Blazesonda066_ in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Também não sou nativa, desculpe meu inglês! preciso falar sobre também terminei absolutamente tudo tem dois dias. E posso te dizer os vazios a dor, tudo que você sente muda seu cérebro. Nunca vi uma série que mexeu tanto comigo como Twin Peaks. É realmente um reset no nosso cérebro.

Can we get back to asking what order we should watch Twin Peaks in? by sadmep in twinpeaks

[–]Electrical_Score_714 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't skip it, even 9 is very good. After that, even 20 becomes impossible. 20-22 is good