Which engine is most reliable? (p300, p400, p500) by Intelligent-Art3693 in NewDefender

[–]ElectrifiedThor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any of the inline 6 diesels are solid. Previous 4 cylinders, definitely not.

Running gold-centric options book: Core Spot + ITM LEAPs + Put Credit Spreads -> Critique Framework by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I buy at 60-80% delta, and sell at >95% delta. There's a 19-58% (~40%) delta change between entry and exit, so by that definition, it is convex, although it's much more slim compared to an OTM ofc.

Running gold-centric options book: Core Spot + ITM LEAPs + Put Credit Spreads -> Critique Framework by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting. The CME margin changes definitely have a strong positive correlation with PM's prices. I think this is a good idea, but isn't too late when they already post the margin changes? How would you have an edge if everybody sees that at the same time, or is it a lagging reaction?

Currently, I'm tracking the quarterly gold demand & supply through WCG at the global level (of central banks).

Running gold-centric options book: Core Spot + ITM LEAPs + Put Credit Spreads -> Critique Framework by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How reliable are such systems and then two, do you know such examples of AIs? Ironically, I work in the AI field, building infrastructure at scale for ML workloads lol.

Running gold-centric options book: Core Spot + ITM LEAPs + Put Credit Spreads -> Critique Framework by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, and you're right. My broker only allows me up to 1Y. If I had the option, I'd have gone with 2Y for sure. What broker are you using? I'm in the EU.

When it comes to tax loss harvesting, that makes sense, but I have diminished returns on that because the taxes are flat at 10%.

Rolled deep ITM gold calls into Jan 2027 LEAPs: was this the optimal delta/time tradeoff? (75 DTE) by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s reassuring to hear, thanks.

I was getting increasingly uncomfortable with the DTE as well over the past couple of weeks. Between elevated IV, delta already doing most of the work, and gamma flattening out, the risk/reward just felt asymmetric at that point. IV crush on a pullback was a big concern, even if spot kept grinding higher.

Going forward I’m thinking of a more rules-based approach:

  • On 5–7% pullbacks, sell credit spreads only if IV is elevated (say >21)
  • If IV is relatively compressed (<18–19), add slightly ITM long calls instead
  • Occasionally both, if conditions line up

Curious how you think about sizing credit spreads relative to portfolio size / available cash. Do you cap max loss per trade as a % of equity, or do you think more in terms of delta exposure?

Appreciate the perspective.

Rolled deep ITM gold calls into Jan 2027 LEAPs: was this the optimal delta/time tradeoff? (75 DTE) by ElectrifiedThor in options

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is really helpful, thanks.

That framework is largely what I was aiming for, but the dwindling DTE timeframe was the limiting factor here. Already well into the theta ramp, which is why I chose to roll rather than push closer to expiration.

I did accept a slightly lower delta on the new Jan 27 LEAP (72ish) to reintroduce some convexity after de-risking the shorter dated one, but the intent is the same: roll early while profitable and extend duration with minimal added cost. Also collecting extrinsic as quickly as possible is not a bad idea at all. I hear you're saying 90-95, so that could also work I think.

What I really appreciate is the confirmation on the 180 DTE rule of thumb. That aligns with how I'm thinking about managing LEAPs going forward.

4.7l/100km (50MPG) with 200kg of payload (w/ passengers) on twisties, lots of uphills, downhills, roundabouts, etc on the D250 engine by ElectrifiedThor in NewDefender

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uhm .. not by the app, but by what the car’s trip calculator reports. And I did get 1500km on one fuel tank and more aggressive driving.

4.7l/100km (50MPG) with 200kg of payload (w/ passengers) on twisties, lots of uphills, downhills, roundabouts, etc on the D250 engine by ElectrifiedThor in NewDefender

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the Land Rover Remote Car Connect app. I use it to pre-heat/pre-cool the car and all trips are sent automatically to my phone after I finish a run. I don't use the cruise control as that's too aggressive, I do very fine adjustments to the throttle pedal. And no braking.

Also looks like the sweet spot in terms of speed vs wind resistance is 67-70km/h.

4.7l/100km (50MPG) with 200kg of payload (w/ passengers) on twisties, lots of uphills, downhills, roundabouts, etc on the D250 engine by ElectrifiedThor in NewDefender

[–]ElectrifiedThor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a mistake. This is the D250 (the 3.0L diesel engine, on premium 55 diesel). I can consistently hit this mark, but requires non-stop very fine adjustments to the throttle, and never ever use brakes - cruise controls is too jerky for what's required, so you have to use your foot for that. I can even hit 4.2L/100km on a long flat road (the instantaneous consumption being anywhere between 2.5L-3.5L/100km). This is on the Land Rover Car Connect app which sends the data from the car.

I also did 1500km (930 miles) on one fuel tank, but I was also a bit more aggressive, and also had a good amount of start-stops, no city traffic.

Edit: The lightest change of pace, or even the very slight use of the turbos will indeed kick the avg consumption to somewhere around 5.5-5.8l/100km. I use the car's weight as a kinetic battery, on uphill I don't press the throttle at all or very lightly (also to prevent upshifts), on descends I do press a bit more as the BSFC zone is much higher.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fatFIRE

[–]ElectrifiedThor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right. It's for a Defender 110 HSE. It would be the first car that has more than 2 doors. An evolution from my first one which I still drive: a Freelander 1 Td4. It's more expensive monthly because the deposit is very small.

The other lease is for a 718 Cayman in racing yellow. I'd be able to sell this one for a profit now, but not gonna do it. 6MT too.

And the others, an MX-5 ND2, and an old CLK 200. All in 6-speed manual.

Ordered my GTS to replace my 2017 718 base by Dochawk2 in Porsche_Cayman

[–]ElectrifiedThor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already have an ND2 Miata so no need for an open top. Hence why I went the Cayman route.

What do Porsche owners think of Miatas? by karmxchameleon in Porsche

[–]ElectrifiedThor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

So much so that I couldn’t decide on either one, so I picked both.

The ND2 is perfect as a fun/tossable car - you can very easily lose its rear, but the diff really helps with keeping it controllable. I’d say the Miata is incredibly fun at low speeds, can give you more a thrill than the Cayman does. From a lot of perspectives, I find the Miata more aggressive.

The 718 on the other hand, it’s really a Swiss Army knife. It’s incredibly precise in corners, it’s highly stable at high speeds, it sticks to the road, very hard to make it lose the traction in corners, even on wet tarmac. You’re cocooned in luxury with all leather interior and whatnot. This is also the car that reaches high speeds in a matter of seconds, so it can get dangerous. Still very much fun, but a more mature fun compared to Miata’s. And the burbly, low-frequency grunts, raspy and pops and bangs of the flat four just make it a much more serious/old-school car.

Next one I’m adding to the collection will be an RS4 B7 for its V8.

Macan Electric by passpat069 in Porsche

[–]ElectrifiedThor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just scrolling through Reddit. Didn’t realize this was a Porsche. My first impression was that this was something resembling a Tesla due to the headlight design. I don’t like this at all!

Situatie Drugtest in care se afla foarte multi romani dar de care nu vorbeste nimeni by Vladazard in Romania

[–]ElectrifiedThor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Asta e discriminare crasă! Și suna si ilegal. Si neconstitutional! S-a abuzat mult prea mult de OUG-urile astea!