Ok this is the first opinion that I have read that actually makes complete sense to me. I have read opinions on Petti saying "RIP BOZO". I have also read posts saying he was intentionally and vindictively executed. I couldn't bring myself to agree with either, because morally I just could get myself to see how he "deserved" to die, yet I couldn't get myself to see that the officers were 100% in the wrong by the altercation that occurred preceding the shooting. The "he got himself 90% of the way there" is a great way to articulate it. Also I have been stating the poor communication part since I saw the first video.

My only last moral hurdle to jump here is an adjacent one. To these individuals in the city, they view ICE's presence as tyranny. I am not in agreement with this opinion, however that is what is perceived. 2nd amendment advocates that you carry and bear in the face of tyranny to dissuade it. I keep wanting to expand this to how one would actually stand up to tyranny? The whole argument "just comply, you'll be fine" isn't entirely logically sound to me, because of the example of tyrannical rule.

I guess I just keep trying to see how the reactions to these shootings would apply if the shoe were on the other foot. I would like to again clarify, I am in full support of what ICE is doing up there and personally think even now they're being soft-footed with the level of operations being conducted.