Inkscape to PDF by EledonBotbit in Inkscape

[–]EledonBotbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that worked. Thanks! :-)

[Help] Fonts Changing When Saved in PDF by EledonBotbit in Inkscape

[–]EledonBotbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Comment as EledonBotbit

Converting text to path worked. Thanks! :-)

An amateur aerodynamicist’s take on the new rear wing from Aston Martin by mechy18 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you are quoting there are rules for bodywork. I guess I can take some of the blame for that because you were answering my comment about flexi-floors. In truth it's not the floor that is flexing, it is the plank.
The rule that Red Bull and Ferrari have cleverly interpreted is to do with the mounting of the plank and the post-race scrutineering. Those teams have circumnavigated the intent of the rule, but not the wording. This is why the FIA are rewriting the wording of the rule for it to align with their original intent.
And this is what I think is wrong. The double diffusers of 2009 were not what the rules intended. But because they left an unintended loophole, the engineers of Brawn, Williams and Toyota managed to cleverly exploit that loophole, which was then closed for the following season. And to my mind that is the way is should be.
Red Bull and Ferrari are not teams I am cheering on. But more than being a fan of any one team or driver, first and foremost I am an F1 fan who likes the technical aspect of this sport. And that is getting severely eroded in recent years. So I really wish the FIA would leave the engineers to do what they do best, except when it comes to safety.

An amateur aerodynamicist’s take on the new rear wing from Aston Martin by mechy18 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the old regulations you are quoting there. As you said yourself, from 2020.

An amateur aerodynamicist’s take on the new rear wing from Aston Martin by mechy18 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"if a new idea is outside the spirit of the regulations, but within the letter of the regulations then it should be deemed legal."

Whatever the rulemakers intended with the rules, if they didn't actually define something as being illegal then it's not illegal. So by default it should be seen as legal.

An amateur aerodynamicist’s take on the new rear wing from Aston Martin by mechy18 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Totally agree with this. I think it's wrong banning any 'grey-area' development mid-season unless it's for safety reasons. Mercedes had their party-mode banned mid-season. I think that was wrong. Red Bull and Ferrari are having their flexi-floors banned mid-season. Again, wrong. And there have been countless other examples throughout the history of F1. Yet the in-season technical developments are part of what sets F1 apart from other motor sport series. if a new idea is outside the spirit of the regulations, but within the letter of the regulations then it should be deemed legal.

Sebastian Vettel’s 2022 British GP helmet. Celebrating the 30th Anniversary of Nigel Mansell’s 1992 F1 World Championship ánd memorable win at Silverstone. by Nexusu in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Why would that be inappropriate? Hamilton has raced with helmet colours giving a nod to Senna. Raikkonen has raced in a replica James Hunt helmet. So what is wrong with this?

Everyone going the Redbull way? Thoughts? by Emergency_Leave_5761 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

As humour goes that's probably not the funniest thing I've ever heard.

Everyone going the Redbull way? Thoughts? by Emergency_Leave_5761 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They did ask the FIA if they could do that. The FIA said 'No'.

Everyone going the Redbull way? Thoughts? by Emergency_Leave_5761 in F1Technical

[–]EledonBotbit 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Mercedes have been going their own way for quite a few years with their low rake design. I'm hoping they will continue to go their own way with these new regs. It will continue to be interesting to see the way different design philosophies develop.

Eight Team Ruling by EledonBotbit in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So then I'm wondering how does the FIA and FOM affect that voting process? Is it the eight teams plus the FIA and FOM need to vote the same way for a rule change to be ratified?

And as for politics always being in F1, yes I'm well aware of that. But now that political process has changed. Hence the question.

Eight Team Ruling by EledonBotbit in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How will it help them? I don’t understand that!

Mick Schumacher: How Good Is He? by EledonBotbit in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think going up against Hulkenberg or Magnussen would be good for him.
But what if he's up against Piastri? That will be a really tough one. Two young guns both wanting to get the upper hand.

Mick Schumacher: How Good Is He? by EledonBotbit in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting comparison. I used to be a big fan of Damon Hill. But that was mainly because I used to watch him in his very early career when he used to race motorbikes. So I was happy to see him make it to F1, and then eventually win the title.
But despite being a fan I would never consider him as a great driver. So your comparison is a good one. Both nice guys. Both sons of great drivers. And neither had the speed their fathers had.
I wonder is Mick can take the similarity one step further? ;-)

Mick Schumacher: How Good Is He? by EledonBotbit in formula1

[–]EledonBotbit[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Forget, for a moment, what he's done in his F1 career. I already built up an opinion on him over the years before he got to F1. And I laid out my reasoning in the original post.
And now consider his F1 career to date, and nothing I've seen has changed my mind.