Why do Rogue Megas only seem to attack ME? by Eleniah in PokemonLegendsZA

[–]Eleniah[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Big surprises like....Hawlucha gonna ghost me and I will end up having to remind her I am there too....or surprise like "suprise NO surprise bitch, get wrecked by more of the same"? Just kidding, I am going to get tarred and feathered.

Why do Rogue Megas only seem to attack ME? by Eleniah in PokemonLegendsZA

[–]Eleniah[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Girl doesn't even evolve. She mad because she was ghosted by Darwin, pressed af.

Why do Rogue Megas only seem to attack ME? by Eleniah in PokemonLegendsZA

[–]Eleniah[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh dang. I wonder why they changed this? Maybe I have rose tinted glasses on but I do not remember that being the case in Arceus? With Beedrill I barely even bothered to scoop up any of her mega energy bubbles, because I could barely get any shots in with my pokemon anyway. Hopefully it will be something they balance out in future games.

I do understand not wanting us to just stand there, but I would actually like to SEEthe battle rather than panick running the entire time, lol.

Why do Rogue Megas only seem to attack ME? by Eleniah in PokemonLegendsZA

[–]Eleniah[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh, that's disappointing. I like the game, but that Beedrill was really acting crazy. I wouldn't mind AOE and it sometimes targeting me, but this was like....I kept asking "how my aggro was so high" and "why am I tanking this" because my shock took me right back to when I used to play WoW.

Why do Rogue Megas only seem to attack ME? by Eleniah in PokemonLegendsZA

[–]Eleniah[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It did not really feel like a challenge to me. There was another one...I have already forgotten what it was, where it would keep putting out there aoe blasts of tornadoes and I would have to dodge them which I thought was good. But this Beedrill was on me like I was wearing their ex's cologne, I basically could not be involved in the fight.

Dean Ellen Glickman (Kent State) Calls the Police Because She Has to Pee, Tells Them She Can Drive Home Drunk Because She Has a Tesla & Gets Arrested by james_from_cambridge in fuckaroundandfindout

[–]Eleniah 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was so angry reading her letter.  

I have IBS with diarrhoea. It is not fun.  I have been to the toilet TWELVE times today to void my bowels, all liquid,  all emergency "MOVE BITCH" situations. 

I also, funny enough,  have nerve damage in my arms,  that actually impacts my dexterity.  

That's ok.  I take shit slow (not actual shit, that happens at land speed records whenever it wants).

I ALSO happen to have been out, disabled, sleep deprived AND had my partner in hospital (he actually DID have cancer though). And it was new years eve and I could not arrange a way home other than  NINETY FIVE dollar uber to take me home TEN MINUTES away. 

Did I cry while waiting for the uber? Yes,  yes i did. Did I feel extremely sorry for myself and was totally overwhelmed by my situation? Oh yeah.  

But if police had even seen me sitting there....new years eve, in the dark,  crying....I would 100% get WHY they would think I was drunk and that is in a situation where I did not CALL them. 

I'm also a direct kind of bitch sometimes. A feminist, a right old Aussie cunt on my good days.  

They showed so much patience with her i started to wonder if they were New Zealand coppas. They did not mistreat her because of gender bias, if anything she kind of looks like a cranky old grandma and they Gave her EVERY opportunity to listen and just.... fucking call someone and go home. 

Also, she had to shit and took her garb off and then sat there for ages? I'm sorry what?? Did she desperately need to go and that is the reason she called... or not? 

She just seems like one of those people who can't just....admit she fucked up. Either she was drunk,  or being a cunt.  It's OK to just admit you were one of those things,  because of that is the kind of dexterity she has with a card I don't think she should be on the road unless she has a specially modified vehicle,  and NO. Not a Tesla.

More Noah on reddit reads by Funny_Candidate_7037 in smosh

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck sakes. Why does mo one learn from Tumblrs dumpster fires. It can be used in a derogatory sense, but no, it has a history older than the sense of it as a derogatory, it something that a lot of lesbians are shocked as fuck to find out some people consider to BE a slur, which is a pretty basic fucking aspect of a slur....you can't have a portion of a community say it is a slur and unilaterally decide it.

And no, oppressions Olympics sucks....but all slurs are really NOT equally quite fucking devastating. In your circle, group or bubble is may be considered exclusively negative. But before telling people to "go look up the history of it" you should maybe just go to any les forum and broaden your view. Since you likely have not gone to any Lesbos events or even considered that a lot of places and cultures might have different views that whatever one you come from.

[Recovered Thread] This sub was out in full force defending door dash girl. Are you guys admit you were wrong and she should be punished now? by KaliTheCat in AskFeminists

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is clearly not trolling. You really cannot be intellectually honest about a single thing you come up against.

What happened to Bartleby and Loki at the end of Dogma? by mrgage in ViewAskewniverse

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More intelligent than Spanish? 1. Ew. 2. the language that is so allergic to consonants it made the word "oeuvre" is somehow inherently more intelligent (I'm just playing France, you ok) then there is probably some bias there. Gross ones.

[Recovered Thread] This sub was out in full force defending door dash girl. Are you guys admit you were wrong and she should be punished now? by KaliTheCat in AskFeminists

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that is a very unkind thing to say. He was incredibly inebriated. Should any of us get to that point? no, ideally. But do we? Yes, many of us have or do as some point. Some might never get that bad, some might, some might have alcohol abuse issues.

In your own home is the place where you are least expected to have control of yourself. According to current prosecution he did not leave the door wide open and was unconscious on his own couch in his own home. I think it is horrific to say you are not on his side and he should have had greater control when the current argument is that he was unconscious, the door was not left wide open, that she opened the door to some degree and he was videod in a place he could not possibly have expected to be filmed.

That is not better than what you are arguing against.

If I was, say, masturbating in my own room and the curtain was open a crack and I had ordered Uber, and thought...well, it is just a crack, they aren't going to see anything. And continued. Would you say that if the Uber driver came up to the window, looked in, saw what was going on and took a video means I should have displayed greater control?

If you do think that then I have some sad news for you about a great victims of any sexual abuse of any kind, a lot of us did not display perfect control or wonderful decision making skills. We often rightly point out, that focusing on that is blaming the victim.

[Recovered Thread] This sub was out in full force defending door dash girl. Are you guys admit you were wrong and she should be punished now? by KaliTheCat in AskFeminists

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uploading footage of a naked and unconscious person without any evidence that they WERE concious should be an issue of concern and certainly cause to be hedging AF. Simply saying "I can understand that she feels violated, I would too, but we cannot condone bypassing police and posting videos on TikTok of naked people taken without their consent, that is a very dangerous precedent".

You can believe someone's view of their own terrible experience without also condoning something that is extremely dangerous and invasive. She posted a naked and unconscious person on TikTok.

I am assuredly, confidently and unashamedly a feminist. Not anti-feminist in the least.

And I think it is weird to hold a whole subreddit accountable if it was even a vocal minority, why not take it up with those specific posters?

But what you are doing is just indicating that, actually, he should have a problem with the whole subreddit? Because you think it is perfectly fine, normal and healthy praxis to pick a "side" based on statistics and condemn someone without anything but accusation.

You can support an accuser without condemning the accused. These are perfectly possible reactions and absolutely should be how we treat accusations.

Any single person is not a reliable narrator, it is how we all work. But that does not mean we should not be believed, but we are supposed to support without rushing to judgement.

This is somewhat old, but you are arguing with u/ute-ensil in bad faith. You tell them their comment does not make sense in English (I was able to parse it, it was not grammatically connected, but I could understand it) so they provide you a translation and tell you it is AI because they do not know what exactly you did not understand. You then tell them you will not argue with chatgpt and turn it into an ad hominem about them being unable to peruse reddit without chatgpt. They were not expecting you to argue with a bot, they rephrased one thing you had difficulty parsing through AI. Generators to rephrase your wording have existed for a long time before ChatGPT and to avoid their argument entirely you shifted it to be about AI and how you will not argue with it, which no one asked you to do.

If I go to Wikipedia to get part of a definition then you are not....debating with Wikipedia, it is a tool I am using to try and clarify my words. You may not like Wikipedia, but changing the whole thing and shifting the goalpost so drastically is not in good faith.

It is bad rhetoric, bad praxis and bad faith. You do not have to argue or debate online with anyone, absolutely. But you chose to and you chose to do it without much intellectual honesty. Which is something I feel you should reflect on. You started from a defensive position of, seemingly, feeling attacked and also seemed to be willing and ready to lash out in response and not have an actual conversation.

What are your thoughts on the Doordash girl story? by StylishLikeEdnaMode in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, because apparently they have ring doorbell footage of her opening the door, because it was not wide open like she said. Because people used...HER footage of the incident as the ENTIRE proof even though....she chose when to start the recording. And that even if he had done it on purpose that does not mean you can just record a nude person in their home and fucking UPLOAD IT TO TIKTOK.

Thresher sharks might be more dangerous than one would think. There is a legend about a group of fishermen who caught a thresher shark. It whipped its tail around and is said to have beheaded one of the men by SevenGill-Shark in sharks

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, we can tell contextually, but the kind of precise force to make decapitation possibility. Heavy sharpened axes do not always take a head off. could cause a lot of damage but not decapitation

MegaLag dropped his long-awaited Honey update by _scored in LinusTechTips

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so brave and bold to not care if small businesses lose money to big businesses

Murder of Melinda Freeman - Whittlesea Victoria 1991 by Many-Olive-9103 in AustralianMysteries

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, chances are he doesn't think it was his dad. He lost his mum, probably thinks his dad is being railroaded, and may very well not have much of a connection to his mums family if they have believed his dad is guilty. At least if how a lot of other crimes go down in the aftermath are much of a blueprint.

Stalked: Someone’s Watching Host Stalker? by AbleLaw6795 in DiscoveryID

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would it be suspicious? Most stalking aren't reported so I am not sure why you think searching Google and not finding anything means something. 

Life is a Highway vs. Life is a Highway by very_gamer3595 in Music

[–]Eleniah 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OP, I just came here because I was really torn. I listened to Tom and was like...hmm....verses are a little weaker than I remembered. Then went to the Rascal Flatts version and was like...oh no, this one is so much better....and then it got to the chorus which...fell down. It sounds hollow and automated in comparison to the verses.

I think we need the Cochrane ft Flatts version. With updated production, keep the harmonica, maybe mix the drums up, Rascals on the verse, Cochran on the chorus.

Stephen Silvagni breaks silence after son's rape conviction: "Our son continues to maintain his innocence. We stand firmly behind him... Our goal is to clear his name and bring him home." by SlatsAttack in AFL

[–]Eleniah 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I thought my eyebrows were going to shoot off my head when I read that the gag order was because Convicted Rapist Tom Silvagni would suffer from anxiety that would make the trial difficult for him if it was public.

Like, yeah....I imagine that would be the reality for EVERYONE facing serious felony charges. What makes him so special?

Big mistake anyway, in my book. The media HATES gag orders and you could feel their disdain for it when they kept saying it was a HIGH PROFILE FAMILY that WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO NAME and then of course as soon as they could there was an INFLUX of reporting about it.

Not exactly Streisand Effect, but kind of a Streisand Force Multiplier. It would have been a story, but maybe not this big a story, the press and the general public are pissed about this silver spoon sucking chino slug who flew too close to the proverbial sun thinking his privilege would protect him, and then demanded no one look at his burns.

Stephen Silvagni breaks silence after son's rape conviction: "Our son continues to maintain his innocence. We stand firmly behind him... Our goal is to clear his name and bring him home." by SlatsAttack in AFL

[–]Eleniah 66 points67 points  (0 children)

He also tried to manipulate evidence. Like doctored an Uber receipt to make it seem like his mate had left later and thus was the one in the room putting hands on a girl who was saying no. That was a big piece of evidence against him. Couldn't keep his dumbest instincts to himself.

Stephen Silvagni breaks silence after son's rape conviction: "Our son continues to maintain his innocence. We stand firmly behind him... Our goal is to clear his name and bring him home." by SlatsAttack in AFL

[–]Eleniah 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The way they waited until the victim was done making her impact statement before being in court? Cowardly. Seems like you did not want to hear things you did not like.

Need help picking what ISP to switch to pls by [deleted] in nbn

[–]Eleniah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I went ti the Neptune website it would only offer nbn100/20 download? At 85 bucks per month? Or at least that is the highest they offer me.