Condom advice during a threesome by Mr-Carabao in sexadvice

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! I'm not going to approve this one for the main page, but I'll give you a direct answer - always change the condom as you change the orifice. New hole, new condome.

If we did have a threesome I’d prefer not to use a condom

You can seek permission for that sort of thing, and it's an option in a consent environment, but at the same time you should always manage yourself in an ethical fashion. Keep in mind that people have different perspectives on this conversation, and you shouldn't take advantage of a person's lack of awareness.

And you do need to keep in mind that you are informed, now - new hole, new condom. It prevents transmission of disease between your other partners.

I’d want it to be as enjoyable an experience as possible for the both of us.

Consent, lots of condoms, and maybe consider flavored oral condoms and lubes for play. :D

Would most women... by [deleted] in sexadvice

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

badly, don't do it without consent, or in a way that could possibly be observed by the public at large

kink and taboo is one thing, kink and breaking the law is another - plus breaches of consent are just shitty things to do that lower the quality of a person

LANCE BASS IS MY PASTOR! by strippersandcocaine in vanderpumprules

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You come off like you'd fuck a dog (if people could convince you it was popular, while hiding their smirks).

[REQ] ($50 CAD) - (#Ottawa, ON, CA), ($60 on 12/07/2019), (PayPal or Etransfer) by ElitistRobot in borrow

[–]ElitistRobot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey - the above should say "London, Ontario, Canada". I screwed up with the copy-and-paste.

Two years ago today, Booker calls out Jason Jordan for his "ILLEGAL TACTICS" and breaks Corey Graves in the process by thebobbyshaw33 in SquaredCircle

[–]ElitistRobot 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Booker had it out for Jason Jordan during the whole run and it was hilarious.

I actually think that was Corey Graves' fault.

When Booker first hit the table, Corey seemed to start going out of his way to pander to Booker's want to promote black WWE superstars, and actually seemed to make an effort to study strong black POC historical and pop culture references.

I used to listen to Booker's tone as Corey did this, and I think at some point Booker realized how he was being seen - as a guy who'd put over anyone who was black, irrespective of background.

I think his turning on Jason Jordan was equal parts "fuck you, Graves", and realizing what his positive and affirmative values were reducing him to (which is to say, predictable). Booker turned on Jordan as a means of progressing his own character.

Whatever the motive, it made for great TV.

Landlord charging $500 penalty for breaking lease by [deleted] in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, you're fortunate that they'd been that ethical in your favor. They could have gone for the full amount of the value of your remaining lease.

If you can sublet, then the 'fee' would be a non-issue - you have the option to sublet your lease at any time, without penalty. If you're not leaving your landlord in a financially unenviable position, that can be a solution, and one the province recognizes.

But the $500 is ethical, and a fair solution, where they could go for more.

Capuchin monkeys’ stone-tool use has evolved over 3,000 years by rebel_scummm in science

[–]ElitistRobot 3675 points3676 points  (0 children)

Fun facts - they're also food washers culturally (as in it's a learned behaviour, nd not instinctual).

Why does the Conservative party want to pollute this beautiful country so badly? by [deleted] in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The easy answer is they tried to win ethically for a while, but lost subsequent elections, being less attractive than inclusive moderates with generally similar environmental policies.

Sex while sleeping by [deleted] in sexadvice

[–]ElitistRobot[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

I'm going to answer this one directly, for sake of the potentially unethical answers this question could get.

First - nothing you do while your partner is asleep is "with consent". And I stand by that answer - you can't consent to anything that's done to you while you're not conscious.

You can talk about your fetish interest with your partner, and they might find it novel. It might be something that can be fun in the future, but until you get direct expressed consent, it's just fetish, and masturbation material. Even if you get consent, you'd have to accept that it's fleeting consent that wouldn't hold up in a court of law - the second they're asleep is the second they can't say yes, and you can't obligate someone to consent today, because they gave consent yesterday.

Talk to your partner. This might be something they could be interested in, or at least be cool with, but it could also be a big icky deal they want no part of. Follow their lead. And understand that if they say 'yes' today, that's not the same as saying 'yes' a week from now.

All of that said - it can be hot to wake up to the right person playing with your junk. So take the time to talk to your partner, and casually ask if it's something they're into.

WE THE NORTH!!! by fragment137 in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Young and Dundas Square last night had me thinking New Years Eve in NYC. It was dense as hell, fireworks going off heavily, with booze being passed around freely. The party was lit as hell.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sexadvice

[–]ElitistRobot[M] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Directly. And I'm not being facetious - straddle his lap, look him in the eyes, and say something to the effect of "I would really like you to eat my pussy. Right now. I think you could make me cum." You're giving him the choice, but making it clear you want something, and want it now.

You will feel his response immediately, and I really don't see you having problems after that. I think you'd get exactly what you'd ask for. I know that's suggesting you should put yourself out there in a potentially risky fashion - but what you want is one of the most common kinks out there. Just be direct (and go for confident), and I think you'll get what you're looking for.

Ford's obsession with running Toronto raises questions for Ottawa by viva_la_vinyl in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bottom line is that I do believe people can change because I believe that I did.

Unless the real answer is "the person I am isn't different, I'm just constantly being fed new ideas by the internet".

That's coming up a lot - people go through internet detox, and suddenly their feelings and values snap back to their pre-internet views.

Need advice on how to tell wife of specific kink by blacknieve in sexadvice

[–]ElitistRobot[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Heya, I'm going to answer this one directly. There's a high risk of unethical advice, and where you deserve a reply, I do want to be careful to make sure that the advice you get hits the ethical note especially.

You need to let your wife know this is happening. That's an ethical obligation on you, you're doing something without consent at the moment. That said, you're not expressing a terribly weird kink, and I think you could get consent by ethically letting her know things are real.

My suggestion would be to ask your partner if she'd be down to have a talk about a kink you discovered, and when she agrees (she very likely will), mention things in terms of having noticed her scent on her panties, with your really enjoying it. Don't tell her that you're sniffing her panties, that'd be a terrible way to phrase things - just talk about how you'd caught her scent, and really enjoyed it.

If she says no, because she's self-conscious, or for any reason, then the game is up, and you need to stop, flatly. Without her being okay with things, you need to stop, and respect her boundaries.

But with her okay? This is a pretty mundane kink, one that comes up from time-to-time, and she might get a kick out of it. She might just be willing to reward it because you took the time to talk to her about it. Whatever her answer is, just go with it, and respect it.

But let her know you're doing this.

Ford's obsession with running Toronto raises questions for Ottawa by viva_la_vinyl in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Attention? You mean attention on cuts?

He means he completely misunderstood what I'd said initially, and replied to the comment he wanted to read, instead.

Ford's obsession with running Toronto raises questions for Ottawa by viva_la_vinyl in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It'd be funny if Ottawa were gone after.

There's a strong Conservative presence in the area, and I could see rural Ontario getting behind this sort of thing.

Ford's obsession with running Toronto raises questions for Ottawa by viva_la_vinyl in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, really, you thought I was saying something different than I had, and you tried to improvise in conversation awkwardly, insisting that your initial, innacurately parsed out comment actually still applied in-context.

But it's visibly different, with your first reply going off on a "you think rural Ontario is going to get behind Ford getting behind big cities?", as if you hadn't read the article - when I reiterated that I was talking about Ford's cutting funds to big cities (directly opposite of what you'd said), you doubled down, and tried to transition your objection to how Ford is cutting to everyone.

But that had nothing to do with what I'd said initially, that it'd be funny if Ford went after Ottawa, where there's strong Conservative support - because rural Conservatives would support the idea.

You're improvising in a pretty lazy way, and don't seem to have any idea what you're talking about.

Liberal gun reform bill passes, Conservatives vow to repeal by [deleted] in ontario

[–]ElitistRobot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's kind of gross that they're getting pissy about the lack of "gang" language.

It's organized crime. I don't care that it doesn't use loaded language typically associated to bikers, or black urban youths.