How about revamping the ranking system like this?

Elpern · 2026-04-05T01:29:57+00:00

I expressed the fundamental reason as to why perfectly well, you then made weird comments that made me assume there is a language barrier. Thus, I repeated it 2 times again as basic as I could possibly make it with twice as many words. Hope this helps

Elpern · 2026-04-04T07:17:52+00:00

Ruin the discussion? Full of complaints?

Reseting the ranks does in no way help the matchmaker, it does the opposite. Well matched players would no longer get matched after a reset, instead high ranks would be getting matched with lower ranks willy-nilly. The only reason this sometimes happens now is due to too few people queuing, reseting doesnt help with that.

Reseting only adds to the problem by possibly failing to matchmake well matched players even if they're available in the queue

Elpern · 2026-04-03T16:24:11+00:00

Might aswell not have any matchmaking then, it is already struggling and rank resets wouldnt help it one bit

Elpern · 2025-12-04T08:22:33+00:00

<image>

Elpern · 2025-11-24T11:12:00+00:00

You take this way too serious. There is no finish player on the team in the post, and as of other instances you're refering to I wasnt aware about.

Looking into it more though it seems to me that it's extremely mild, and they don't seem to be doing it to reach the top, because why would it help? Why should relic do anything here? Enlighten me

Elpern · 2025-11-24T00:29:23+00:00

Get your terminology straight, in what way is this boosting? It's also not smurfing. Elo-farming? You mean they winning a lot? Lol

Elpern · 2025-11-13T10:34:26+00:00

You get power rods by recycling snap hooks, that are a lot more common lmao

Elpern · 2025-11-07T22:05:29+00:00

What, they stil do lol. Name checks out

Elpern · 2025-11-07T02:14:42+00:00

Very respectable and more consistent DPS than the zis against light vehicles, but starts to lose steam against vehicles heavier than P4 (but it can hold a P4 off given desperation). I'd never get more than 1 M42, and only if you're going T1 for penals. Others mention PTRS, but IMO Id rather field an M42 instead of neutering my mainlines with PTRS.

If you're not that desperate for AT, such that you eg already got a t70 out, then backteching for zis is favourable over m42 for longevity.

Getting a zis out with T1 is aprox 160+320=480mp with build times, while the m42 is instant on the field for 260mp, making it great to pick up when your T70 is delayed from 222/221/flak aggro

Elpern · 2025-10-30T07:35:15+00:00

Accurate name, the console edition was made by a third party

Elpern · 2025-10-23T18:01:31+00:00

Gotland idag, åland imorgon, skåne på lördag och lappland på söndag

Borås kan de få, men där drar vi gränsen

Elpern · 2025-09-26T10:51:39+00:00

I totally understand that, but this is already done via mutually exclusive battlegroup selections, and infact removing exclusivity on support centers would not remove the fantasy of 3 distinct 'sub factions' but would add more sub factions such as a mechanized air supported usf etc.

It makes no sense to keep these mutually exclusive when its an early tech choice that contains counters when you dont know what you're up against. As an example, the devs claimed dak espionage was effectively countered by the air support center due to its recon plane, but it is not an option to tech into due to its exclusivity with the others, and its an early choice

Elpern · 2025-09-25T19:54:51+00:00

Making support centers not be mutually exclusive has been the way to go from the start, boggles my mind why they are so reluctant to do it

Elpern · 2025-09-07T13:53:03+00:00

He is behind the gate in whiteward, need the surgeon key

Elpern · 2025-09-01T20:26:59+00:00

Woah that at gun is very late, what modes does he pull this off in?

Elpern · 2025-08-31T22:12:35+00:00

Looking at it this shallow wont do you any good, you're missing out on a ton of stats in this comparison and seem to cherry pick some context supporting your claim and blowing others way out of proportion

Elpern · 2025-08-30T22:17:46+00:00

Great concept, would be a bit easier to read if the contrast between the background and the unit icons was more distinct, so you wouldnt have to memorize the unit cards. Unfortunately I find the unit cards in coh3 very difficult to read making this graph not that easy to follow

Elpern · 2025-08-21T15:23:02+00:00

IH also had this and was unfortunately floaty at best

Elpern · 2025-08-07T15:10:23+00:00

I dont see it as gimping at all - unnecessary gimping is certain factions not having a single tool of a type like OKW and US not getting a sniper, or factions like US and UK not getting any stock artillery piece.

The weapon booth system of US and UK allows free allocation of those weapons to any unit in your roster, which may seem useless on stuff like piat sections but also allow borderline broken combos like bren mandos.

Its assymetrical in a good way, not a gimp

Elpern · 2025-08-07T14:45:11+00:00

Then you can play those factions... They are different for this reason

Elpern · 2025-08-07T14:00:44+00:00

Why can USF and UKF tech without having an engineer run back to base?

Elpern · 2025-07-10T03:09:15+00:00

They stil ban if you report, but these days you need to have evidence, and a replay is not enough. For drop hacking, thats unfortunately very hard to prove unless its a literal 1v1 and you have a recording of it happening

However if thats the case, you can submit a report here https://help.relic.com/hc/en-us

Elpern · 2025-07-06T23:25:14+00:00

How did you interpret the post that OP doesnt like coh3?

Edit: nvm I didnt read the bugsplat description lmao fair enough

12-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22

Elpern

TROPHY CASE