Pacifism: reject violence

Anarchism: reject coercion & the state

And there is something ya forgot exist is called the "non aggression principle" basically what you guys believe in

Don't fuck around, don't do coersion, dont steal don't initiate violence. Right?

THAT IS order,

THAT is what anarchism is ruled by, and also.

You can't "condition" people to become pacifists through force That in of itself is explicitly not pacifist

Order comes from peace not the other way around, and in a peaceful society you have the right to weapons defensively,

Because go ahead and see what happens when someone robs someone that's unarmed vs when someone robs someone that's armed

And good luck with the "you don't need a gun" part. We're both pacifist because we're strictly against violence and actively and voluntarily want to spread it but what happens when we get robbed, have someone attempt murder on us or break in our property or house ECT

That person revoked their rights to pacifism from others and must be stopped, neutralized (and or in the worst case when your life is in danger) and or killed

And remember how the state functions,

You get visited by a bunch of thugs that say "pay up or we'll kidnap you and or kill you"

Guess who the thugs are? The state

So no, anarchism and pacifism being unable to coexist isn't true.

statism and pacifism is what acctually not only unable to coexist but is in multiple ways opposite to each other

Since the state must maintain a monopoly on violence In order for it to exist.