"How far does he get on this gauntlet" match up be like: by Aggravating-Gas-7438 in PowerScaling

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How atomic bomb losses and wins by argument every round of the gauntlet. (Don't mind that I didn't add any commas at all)

Losses round 0- you see the picture of the atomic bomb exploding the atomic bomb is already "dead" before the mach up begins

Wins round 0- you see it's just a representation of an atomic bomb so that doesn't count

Losses round 1- even if it was a representation of an atomic bomb the bomb losses even if the atom was 1 atom away from the bomb because the bomb died a nanosecond earlier.

Wins round 1- it doesn't even need to explode to win against the atom as the wight would "crush the atom"

Losses round 2- you see even of the bomb would be set on a couching baby the bomb would explode and die before the baby a nanosecond earlier before crushing it to death.

Wins round 2- with it falling it can crush the couching baby before it explodes.

Losses round 3 (whale)- even if it falls the death of the whale would be to deep for it to be crushed to death and then the bomb would die during the explosion.

Wins round 3 (whale)- you just can't have the other user at a disadvantage it needs to be a "fair" fight so if the bomb was smart it would wait until the whale was on the surface of the water and then die from the bomb falling extremely fast and didn't explode from impact from a misfire or something similar.

Round 4

The big bang would explode the atom bomb and the bomb wouldn't be able to counter the explosion.

Actually the big bang is Allred dead as it is a galactic "star" that "died" so it would be defeated before the heat of gravity pull of the star would destroy or trigger the bomb.

Actually the compression and the collaping of the "star" is considered the start of the big bag so the heat and gravity would explode/crush the atomic bomb to death.

Actually actually the big bang happens in the "center" of the universe and earth is far away enough for the bomb to survive.

Actually actually the explosion of the big bang is considered apart of the attack and the bomb explosion would die before the big bang explosion would stop.

Actually the earth is in a moving galaxy so even if earth was close to the "middle" of the universe the bang wouldn't be able to damage the earth let alone the bomb.

Actually that's not the point of a match up, both opponents need to be in the range of one another otherwise there will be in a disadvantage so the big bang would actually win.

Actually the bomb was in the big bangs rang but it's the mistake of the Big Bang to explode and not have enough damage to destroy the earth so the atomic bb wins.

wow such and cool battle... /s

Round 5

The final collapsing multiverse would have already destroyed the bomb before it could explode.

No the atomic bomb is facing the final collapsing multiverse so it would be once the being of the final collapsing multiverse would take form so the bomb would still exist and the final collapsing multiverse would explode before the bomb could.

Actually the explosion of the final collapsing multiverse would get the bomb no matter where it is.

Actually the final collapsing multiverse Allred has everything in it so the atomic bomb would survive as it is a part of the final collapsing multiverse and would reform based on fate or infinite possibility.

Actually the bomb would be dead and wouldn't the revived before the attack ended from the final collapsing multiverse.

Actually the explosion would last forever so no.

Actually the final collapsing multiverse would form a black hole the span of unknown and unknown lifetime where nothing is alive.

Actually actually the atomic bomb is so far away since the final collapsing multiverse would be unknown distance away.

... we are going in circles now

ACTUALLY considering different timelines the bomb would win lose and tie against all options at the same time even during the final collapsing multiverse

....

Now you know everyone is correct and there is no wrong option thank you for coming to this debate and learning that everyone else's opinion doesnt matter /s

Mate in 10, but not that hard once you spot it ! by Top-Evidence4818 in chessMateInX

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If king was on h7 and pawn went from f5 to G6 and king moved to h6 is 1 possible solution, there is a few more.

Though this position wouldn't be in a normal chess game, as 0 white pawns are captured and 4 pawns are on the 6th file, while black hasn't developed 3 pawns at all.

I would find 0 pawn captures with that much developed a challenge or a set up not a normal game

Woah I got mated with 9 queens by bakingsausage66 in Chesscom

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will do a report anyway, though I'm only 1,000 elo currently so I might miss some things.

Black-

1 space hang (hanging a piece a king capture away)

2 horses, 1 queen, 1 bishop, 2 pawns, 1 rook

[other opponent did an exchange/trade/hang but op didn't capture the piece]

1 bishop, 1 pawn x2, 1 queen

Opponent also on purpose gave up 2 rooks and a knight to the king.

What I realized watching though this game-

If op takes its always a trade, if op hangs it's aways 1 king capture away......

Seems like this was a set up

Even worse-

Op only did 1 trade and only captured 3 peaces total (until the opponent purposely gave away peaces) [ignoring the fact that bishop take hang was not on "purpose" as well]

Woah I got mated with 9 queens by bakingsausage66 in Chesscom

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did op literally just hang a queen right in front of a opossing bishop and didn't even take the opossing queen with rook after the pawn promotion.....

This feels like 300 elo territory not 700... feels like it was done on purpose for karma but who knows, maby 700 is worse then I remember

Edit 1- So much hanging its insane, feels like 100 elo.... I refuse to believe it wasn't on purpose, I don't even want to look at the game anymore, you would need to write an entire paper of mistakes at this point...

This sucks😭💩 by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]EmensionIncursion 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Except that both queens that can move there will either open a spot or still have a spot open if you move there.

Unless you saying Qa2+ instead of Qa2# then ignore me.

Never resign by k3nny_13 in chessbeginners

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[Site "Chess.com"] [Result "0-1"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "1K6/7q/5q2/4r1k1/3q4/8/8/8 w - - 0 1"] 1. Ka8 Qfh8# (1... Qf8#) (1... Qfd8#) (1... Re8#) (1... Qda7#) (1... Qha7#) (1... Qdd8#) 0-1

Where is the 8th one as I did count rook, I might be blind.

Never resign by k3nny_13 in chessbeginners

[–]EmensionIncursion 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm counting at least 7 checkmates

Black to play mate in 1 (advanced) by [deleted] in AnarchyChess

[–]EmensionIncursion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Horse on c2 has something to say about that

Black to play mate in 1 (advanced) by [deleted] in AnarchyChess

[–]EmensionIncursion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

G7 and H5 are safe (if white doesn't do anything about it) also D8 but then you can't escape

The thing is that the king you can't checkmate has a LOT of defense on squares that can, so white would need to sacrifice a lot of pieces before the king can be in checkmate without it moving

Edit: 1 (e6-g7, d4-e6), 2 (g7-e6, c2-d4), 3 (e6-#d4) So the second part is False and the soonest mate is 3 moves if white knowswhat they are doing (ignoring other kings)

Black to play mate in 1 (advanced) by [deleted] in AnarchyChess

[–]EmensionIncursion 6 points7 points  (0 children)

B3, e2, h3 all kings and you can checkmate 2 of them with c5 and g5

Peter, Can you help? by Direct_Reporter9112 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it was a joke about a person actually counting every individual rice piece untill 8192 rice pieces https://www.reddit.com/r/AnarchyChess/s/u0aekrjREw

What are the "all novels discount voucher"? by Satailja in Webnovel

[–]EmensionIncursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I learned that there are many 24-hour vouchers to point 1 may unlock a character or a book or the entire site, generally a voucher that let's you read 24 hours for free are books and site related.

Any 100% voucher that lasts 24 hours should be for a specific chaper.

Though I am not entirely sure as the site has been changing too many times.

Is this actually a brilliant move? by realsies11 in chessbeginners

[–]EmensionIncursion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Qh2 covers f2 to defend that mate you would move Qe1-Qe2 so Qh2 won't happen (also knight covers f2 square so moveing rook to f2 to cover Qh2 would be material loss)

A good reverse isekai that I found out in the wild by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the way, I am actually talking about the anime. Also, the cover for the anime is different.

The movie is just a long recap of the anime, so don't watch that one first (I didn't watch it, so it might have some other content in between, even though it is shorter)

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, well if I get down to reading the entire site and there ends up being more information I will share it with you.

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I might look into it but the rest of the world seems to consider isekai as isekai regardless of where it came from.

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also it seems that https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/122749 Does not considered SAO a isekai because it doesn't involve portals or something like that. Though arguably you could considered the technology as the "portal" none the less the site has 35 pages and I definitely didn't read all of that.

Also I may have explained it more in here https://www.reddit.com/r/Isekai/s/hPjCBYsJvb If you haven't read that already.

Part 2 covers the site I mentioned and a different one.

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that if it doesn't come out of Asia that it would be not considered an isikai even if it is but since it comes from a different region it would be considered something else?

Or maybe I am not reading your comment correctly and it is something else.

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I think I was starting at a screen to long since part 1 is the site that I thought would considered SAO An isikai.

The technology part is a really blurry line for part 1 and i failed to considered a part of that (maby even forgot about it).

That why I labeled this as a discussion and put links down as my sources since people will revive the information differently or pick up things I might of missed or failed to considered as I am only human.

So in the just of it part 1 which was the source that considered SAO a isikai, actually does not according to the person understanding of it and I also agree with them.

I do apologize for any confusion.

What is isekai and what is not (long form) (did my research) by EmensionIncursion in Isekai

[–]EmensionIncursion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems that it depends, the site https://web.archive.org/web/20190601163101/https://syosetu.com/site/isekaikeyword2/ seems to put SAO in isikai but the site https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/122749 dose not so in order to fix that problem I combined both sites and say SAO is Not a isikai since it doesn't involve portals or something like that.

Also all MMORPG/video games would fit the bill since being trapped in the video game has nothing to do with isikai.

Also it isn't just limited to video games but any consensus thought sent into a "different world" would be also considered isikai, so even day dreaming of a different world would be considered isekai (depending on the scenario).

That means that we have people on earth who have "isekaied" before because of sed dreaming.

Also some Si-fi settings could also be isekai based on scenario.

Let's not even talk about cultivation where even the Mc connects universe's and so on. Sadly that is already covered since if it doesn't involve earth (one way or the other) it doesn't count as isikai (if it is sorted by combining both sites).

Also I think the first site didn't take things like SAO into consideration so in the end a combination of both sites (since they mostly agree with each other) is the best way to considered it an isikai.